Literature DB >> 23505031

Hippocampal size predicts rapid learning of a cognitive map in humans.

Victor R Schinazi1, Daniele Nardi, Nora S Newcombe, Thomas F Shipley, Russell A Epstein.   

Abstract

The idea that humans use flexible map-like representations of their environment to guide spatial navigation has a long and controversial history. One reason for this enduring controversy might be that individuals vary considerably in their ability to form and utilize cognitive maps. Here we investigate the behavioral and neuroanatomical signatures of these individual differences. Participants learned an unfamiliar campus environment over a period of three weeks. In their first visit, they learned the position of different buildings along two routes in separate areas of the campus. During the following weeks, they learned these routes for a second and third time, along with two paths that connected both areas of the campus. Behavioral assessments after each learning session indicated that subjects formed a coherent representation of the spatial structure of the entire campus after learning a single connecting path. Volumetric analyses of structural MRI data and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) indicated that the size of the right posterior hippocampus predicted the ability to use this spatial knowledge to make inferences about the relative positions of different buildings on the campus. An inverse relationship between gray matter volume and performance was observed in the caudate. These results suggest that (i) humans can rapidly acquire cognitive maps of large-scale environments and (ii) individual differences in hippocampal anatomy may provide the neuroanatomical substrate for individual differences in the ability to learn and flexibly use these cognitive maps. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23505031      PMCID: PMC3690629          DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  49 in total

1.  Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places.

Authors:  Toru Ishikawa; Daniel R Montello
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test: different versions and factors that affect performance.

Authors:  M Peters; B Laeng; K Latham; M Jackson; R Zaiyouna; C Richardson
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  The role of visual experience in knowledge of spatial layout.

Authors:  J J Rieser; J J Lockman; H L Pick
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-09

Review 5.  Are the dorsal and ventral hippocampus functionally distinct structures?

Authors:  Michael S Fanselow; Hong-Wei Dong
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Thoughts, behaviour, and brain dynamics during navigation in the real world.

Authors:  Hugo J Spiers; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map- versus landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts.

Authors:  Patrick Foo; William H Warren; Andrew Duchon; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Using imagination to understand the neural basis of episodic memory.

Authors:  Demis Hassabis; Dharshan Kumaran; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 10.  Do animals have cognitive maps?

Authors:  A T Bennett
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  54 in total

1.  Geometric and featural systems, separable and combined: Evidence from reorientation in people with Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Katrina Ferrara; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-08-10

2.  Instructions matter: Individual differences in navigation strategy and ability.

Authors:  Alexander P Boone; Bryan Maghen; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10

3.  Habitual action video game playing is associated with caudate nucleus-dependent navigational strategies.

Authors:  Greg L West; Brandi Lee Drisdelle; Kyoko Konishi; Jonathan Jackson; Pierre Jolicoeur; Veronique D Bohbot
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Correction to 'Neural systems for landmark-based wayfinding in humans'.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Lindsay K Vass
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Sex differences in navigation strategy and efficiency.

Authors:  Alexander P Boone; Xinyi Gong; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08

6.  Everyday taxi drivers: Do better navigators have larger hippocampi?

Authors:  Steven M Weisberg; Nora S Newcombe; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 7.  25 years of research on the use of geometry in spatial reorientation: a current theoretical perspective.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Janellen Huttenlocher; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

8.  A Networked Desktop Virtual Reality Setup for Decision Science and Navigation Experiments with Multiple Participants.

Authors:  Hantao Zhao; Tyler Thrash; Stefan Wehrli; Christoph Hölscher; Mubbasir Kapadia; Jascha Grübel; Raphael P Weibel; Victor R Schinazi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-26       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Structural differences in hippocampal and prefrontal gray matter volume support flexible context-dependent navigation ability.

Authors:  Thackery I Brown; Andrew S Whiteman; Irem Aselcioglu; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.

Authors:  David J M Kraemer; Victor R Schinazi; Philip B Cawkwell; Anand Tekriwal; Russell A Epstein; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.