Literature DB >> 14499978

Mammography and breast cancer: the new era.

L Tabár1, P B Dean.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review the evidence demonstrating that early detection of breast cancer substantially decreases death from the disease, and to demonstrate that the significant change in the outcome of breast cancer patients results from a combination of early detection and surgical removal of breast cancer, as treatment of the late stage disease provides little impact on ultimate outcome.
METHOD: Review results of the randomized controlled trials of mammographic screening and the published results of service screening.
RESULTS: Both randomized controlled trials and service screening, when performed properly, provide unequivocal evidence demonstrating that arresting the disease in its preclinically detectable phase has significant impact on outcome. Primary emphasis should be upon preventing breast cancer from developing to metastatic disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Numerous scientific trials have repeatedly and convincingly confirmed that breast cancer is progressive rather than a systemic disease from its inception. Progression of breast cancer can be arrested through detection and treatment at an early phase. The time at which disease progression is arrested has significant impact on clinical outcome, making mammographic screening a key factor in the control of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14499978     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(03)00262-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  12 in total

1.  Association between persistence with mammography screening and stage at diagnosis among elderly women diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Classification of mammogram using two-dimensional discrete orthonormal S-transform for breast cancer detection.

Authors:  Shradhananda Beura; Banshidhar Majhi; Ratnakar Dash; Susnata Roy
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2015-03-31

3.  Comparing contrast-enhanced color flow imaging and pathological measures of breast lesion vascularity.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Babita Kuruvilla; Mark B Pascua; Manisha H Chaudhari; Daniel A Merton; Juan P Palazzo; Barry B Goldberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions detected by bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a sensitivity and specificity study.

Authors:  Sanaz A Jansen; Xiaobing Fan; Gregory S Karczmar; Hiroyuki Abe; Robert A Schmidt; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Factors influencing adherence to mammography screening guidelines in Appalachian women participating in a mobile mammography program.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Traci LeMasters; Elvonna Atkins; Sara Gainor; Stephenie Kennedy; Kimberly Kelly; Linda Vona-Davis; Scot Remick
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-06

6.  Can a phenotype for recessive inheritance in breast cancer be defined?

Authors:  Carolina Ellberg; Göran Jönsson; Håkan Olsson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Public education and targeted outreach to underserved women through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Whitney Levano; Jacqueline W Miller; Banning Leonard; Linda Bellick; Barbara E Crane; Stephenie K Kennedy; Natalie M Haslage; Whitney Hammond; Felicia S Tharpe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  A novel method for contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) evaluation of digital mammography detectors.

Authors:  P Baldelli; N Phelan; G Egan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Do Appalachian women attending a mobile mammography program differ from those visiting a stationary mammography facility?

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Kimberly Kelly; Aaron Metzger; Judith Schreiman; Scot Remick
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-08

Review 10.  The choice of the correct imaging modality in breast cancer management.

Authors:  Emilio Bombardieri; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.