Literature DB >> 23504226

Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone.

B Stawarczyk1, N Bähr, F Beuer, T Wimmer, M Eichberger, W Gernet, D Jahn, P R Schmidlin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the adhesion between PEEK and two self-adhesive resin cements after plasma treatment.
METHODS: Eight hundred sixty-four polyetheretherketone (PEEK) disks were cut and polished to silicon carbide (SIC) P4000. One half of the specimens were randomly selected and pretreated with plasma, whereas the remaining 432 specimens remained untreated. Subsequently, specimens were randomly allocated to four groups (n = 108/group): Visio.link (Bredent), Signum PEEK Bond (Heraeus Kulzer), Ambarino P60 (Creamed), and a control group without additional treatment. Half of the specimens of each group (n = 54) were then cemented with either RelyX Unicem Automix 2 (3 M ESPE) or with Clearfil SA (Kuraray). All specimens were stored in water for 24 h (37 °C). Afterwards, specimens were divided into three groups (n = 18) for different aging levels: (1) no aging (baseline measurement), (2) thermal aging for 5,000 cycles (5/55 °C), and (3) thermal aging for 10,000 cycles (5/55 °C). Thereafter, shear bond strengths (SBS) were measured, and failure types (adhesive, mixed, and cohesive) were assessed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, four- and one-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Scheffé test (p < 0.05).
RESULTS: No adhesion could be established without adhesive pretreatment, irrespectively, whether plasma was applied or not. Also, no bond strength was measured when Ambarino P60 was applied. In contrast, adhesive pretreatment resulted in SBS ranging between 8 and 15 MPa. No significant differences were found between the resin cements used. In general, no cohesive failures were observed. Groups without plasma treatment combined with Visio.link or Signum PEEK Bond showed predominantly mixed failure types. Control groups, plasma treated, or treated using Ambarino P60 groups fractured predominantly adhesively.
CONCLUSION: The use of methyl methacrylate (MMA)-based adhesives allows bonding between PEEK and self-adhesive resin cements. Plasma treatment has no impact on bond to resin cements. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: PEEK reconstructions can be cemented using self-adhesive resin cements combined with pretreatment with MMA-based adhesives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23504226     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-0966-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  20 in total

1.  Effect of different artificial aging conditions on ceramic-composite bond strength.

Authors:  Stefan Martin Wegner; Winnie Gerdes; Matthias Kern
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

2.  Chemical micropatterning of polymeric cell culture substrates using low-pressure hydrogen gas discharge plasmas.

Authors:  A Ohl; K Schröder; D Keller; A Meyer-Plath; H Bienert; B Husen; G M Rune
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Toth; Mei Wang; Bradley T Estes; Jeffrey L Scifert; Howard B Seim; A Simon Turner
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Response of primary fibroblasts and osteoblasts to plasma treated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surfaces.

Authors:  D Briem; S Strametz; K Schröder; N M Meenen; W Lehmann; W Linhart; A Ohl; J M Rueger
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Effects of plasma treatment on the shear bond strength between fiber-reinforced composite posts and resin composite for core build-up.

Authors:  Piriya Yavirach; Pisaisit Chaijareenont; Dheerawan Boonyawan; Kassara Pattamapun; Somruthai Tunma; Hidekazu Takahashi; Mansuang Arksornnukit
Journal:  Dent Mater J       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding.

Authors:  M Kern; A Barloi; B Yang
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.116

7.  Contraction gap under composite resin restorations: effect of hygroscopic expansion and thermal stress.

Authors:  B Torstenson; M Brännström
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.440

8.  Fracture strength and failure mode of maxillary implant-supported provisional single crowns: a comparison of composite resin crowns fabricated directly over PEEK abutments and solid titanium abutments.

Authors:  Hendrik Jacob Santing; Henny J A Meijer; Gerry M Raghoebar; Mutlu Özcan
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.932

9.  Influence of air-abrasion on zirconia ceramic bonding using an adhesive composite resin.

Authors:  B Yang; A Barloi; M Kern
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  In vitro shear bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to various prosthodontic substrates.

Authors:  Camila Sabatini; Manthan Patel; Eric D'Silva
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.440

View more
  12 in total

1.  Bonding of composite resins to PEEK: the influence of adhesive systems and air-abrasion parameters.

Authors:  Bogna Stawarczyk; Simon Taufall; Malgorzata Roos; Patrick R Schmidlin; Nina Lümkemann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  PEEK in Fixed Dental Prostheses: Application and Adhesion Improvement.

Authors:  Biyao Wang; Minghao Huang; Pengrui Dang; Jiahui Xie; Xinwen Zhang; Xu Yan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.967

3.  Shear bond strength between veneering composite and PEEK after different surface modifications.

Authors:  Martin Rosentritt; Verena Preis; Michael Behr; Nuno Sereno; Carola Kolbeck
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Fracture load and failure types of different veneered polyetheretherketone fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Simon Taufall; Marlis Eichberger; Patrick R Schmidlin; Bogna Stawarczyk
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Evaluation of the effects of different surface modification methods on the bond strength of high-performance polymers and resin matrix ceramics.

Authors:  Büşra Tosun; Nuran Yanıkoğlu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Peek polymer in orthodontics: A pilot study on children.

Authors:  Gaetano Ierardo; Valeria Luzzi; Michela Lesti; Iole Vozza; Orlando Brugnoletti; Antonella Polimeni; Maurizio Bossù
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-10-01

7.  Bonding to Different PEEK Compositions: The Impact of Dental Light Curing Units.

Authors:  Nina Lümkemann; Marlis Eichberger; Bogna Stawarczyk
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  The Effect of Various Plasma Gases on the Shear Bond Strength between Unfilled Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and Veneering Composite Following Artificial Aging.

Authors:  Mohamed Younis; Alexey Unkovskiy; Ashraf ElAyouti; Jürgen Geis-Gerstorfer; Sebastian Spintzyk
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 9.  Review on Development and Dental Applications of Polyetheretherketone-Based Biomaterials and Restorations.

Authors:  Ludan Qin; Shuo Yao; Jiaxin Zhao; Chuanjian Zhou; Thomas W Oates; Michael D Weir; Junling Wu; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 10.  The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: A narrative review.

Authors:  Ioannis Papathanasiou; Phophi Kamposiora; George Papavasiliou; Marco Ferrari
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.