Literature DB >> 23503094

Hearing preservation surgery for cochlear implantation--hearing and quality of life after 2 years.

Peter L Santa Maria1, Chloe Domville-Lewis, Catherine M Sucher, Ronel Chester-Browne, Marcus D Atlas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the benefits of hearing preservation surgery in cochlear implantation after 2 years. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Performed at a single academic institution between 2008 and 2010 PATIENTS: Thirteen patients (1 bilateral): 43% male and 57% female subjects. Mean age at surgery was 51 years (range, 32-72 yr). Average duration of deafness was 25 years (range, 5-62 yr). INTERVENTION: Hearing preservation cochlear implantation surgery performed with the Med-El FlexEAS electrode. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pure tone thresholds, speech perception in quiet and noise and quality of life (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit [APHAB] and Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit [GHABP Scales] up to and including 2 years after surgery.
RESULTS: At the first postoperative audiogram, the hearing preservation rate was 100% (complete (42.9%), partial (50%), and minimal (7.1%)). After 24 months, the breakdown was complete (25%), partial (12.5%), minimal (37.5%) and complete loss (12.5%). There was a trend in improvement in all areas of APHAB) with significant improvements in the background noise and reverberation categories as well as the global scores. The GHABP scores showed high levels of use, benefit, and low levels of residual disease.
CONCLUSION: Hearing preservation can be achieved in the short term but deteriorates with time over the medium term at a rate greater than that can be expected with the natural progression of the disease. Patients show benefits in speech outcomes and quality of life regardless of whether hearing preservation was achieved in the medium term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23503094     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318281e0c9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  28 in total

1.  Changes in Gene Expression and Hearing Thresholds After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Hongzheng Zhang; Gemaine Stark; Lina Reiss
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Factors associated with hearing loss in a normal-hearing guinea pig model of Hybrid cochlear implants.

Authors:  Chiemi Tanaka; Anh Nguyen-Huynh; Katherine Loera; Gemaine Stark; Lina Reiss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Cochlear implantation using the underwater technique: long-term results.

Authors:  Konrad Johannes Stuermer; David Schwarz; Andreas Anagiotos; Ruth Lang-Roth; Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink; Jan Christoffer Luers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Influence of In Vitro Electrical Stimulation on Survival of Spiral Ganglion Neurons.

Authors:  Marvin N Peter; Athanasia Warnecke; Uta Reich; Heidi Olze; Agnieszka J Szczepek; Thomas Lenarz; Gerrit Paasche
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.911

5.  Long-term residual hearing in cochlear implanted adult patients who were candidates for electro-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Elisabeth Mamelle; Benjamin Granger; Olivier Sterkers; Ghizlene Lahlou; Evelyne Ferrary; Yann Nguyen; Isabelle Mosnier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Biological therapies in otology.

Authors:  A Roemer; H Staecker; S Sasse; T Lenarz; A Warnecke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Morphological correlates of hearing loss after cochlear implantation and electro-acoustic stimulation in a hearing-impaired Guinea pig model.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Gemaine Stark; Anh T Nguyen-Huynh; Kayce A Spear; Hongzheng Zhang; Chiemi Tanaka; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Predictive factors for short- and long-term hearing preservation in cochlear implantation with conventional-length electrodes.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Brendan P O'Connell; David O Francis; Rene H Gifford; Jacob B Hunter; Jourdan T Holder; Marc L Bennett; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie; David S Haynes
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Viral D Tejani; Julia K Omtvedt; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Jacob J Oleson; Marie V Ozanne
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Hearing Preservation Outcomes With a Mid-Scala Electrode in Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Jacob B Hunter; René H Gifford; George B Wanna; Robert F Labadie; Marc L Bennett; David S Haynes; Alejandro Rivas
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.