Literature DB >> 30843170

Influence of In Vitro Electrical Stimulation on Survival of Spiral Ganglion Neurons.

Marvin N Peter1, Athanasia Warnecke2,3, Uta Reich4, Heidi Olze4, Agnieszka J Szczepek4, Thomas Lenarz1,5, Gerrit Paasche1,5.   

Abstract

Patients scheduled for cochlear implantation often retain residual hearing in the low frequencies. Unfortunately, some patients lose their residual hearing following implantation and the reasons for this are not well understood. Evidence suggests that electrotoxicity could be one of the factors responsible for this late adverse effect. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the survival of spiral ganglion neurons (SGN) subjected to in vitro electrical stimulation (ES). A stimulation setup was developed to provide defined electrical fields at given points of the chamber. SGN isolated from Sprague Dawley rats (P3-4) were dissociated and cultured in the chamber for 24 h prior to biphasic, pulsed electrical field exposure for another 24 h. The current varied in the range of 0 to 2 mA and the pulse width from 10 to 400 μs. Neurite growth and survival were evaluated with respect to the charge density at the position of the cells. Non-exposed SGN cultures served as control. Charge densities below 2.2 μC·cm-2·phase-1 appeared to have no effect on SGN survival and neurite outgrowth. Charge densities above 4.9 μC·cm-2·phase-1 were detrimental to almost all cells in culture. After fitting results to a sigmoidal dose response curve, a LD50 of 2.9 μC·cm-2·phase-1 was calculated. This screening regarding survival and outgrowth of SGN provides parameters that could be used to further investigate the effect of ES on SGN and to develop possible protection strategies, which could potentially rescue residual hearing in the implanted patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Electrical stimulation; Residual hearing; Safety limit; Spiral ganglion neurons; Tissue damage

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30843170     DOI: 10.1007/s12640-019-00017-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotox Res        ISSN: 1029-8428            Impact factor:   3.911


  44 in total

1.  Electrochemical platinum coatings for improving performance of implantable microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  C de Haro; R Mas; G Abadal; J Muñoz; F Perez-Murano; C Dominguez
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Marom Bikson; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Does cochlear implantation and electrical stimulation affect residual hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons?

Authors:  Anne Coco; Stephanie B Epp; James B Fallon; Jin Xu; Rodney E Millard; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Protective effect of electrical stimulation in the deafened guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  D O Hartshorn; J M Miller; R A Altschuler
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  LIF is more potent than BDNF in promoting neurite outgrowth of mammalian auditory neurons in vitro.

Authors:  L N Gillespie; G M Clark; P F Bartlett; P L Marzella
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-02-12       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Culture conditions determine the prevalence of bipolar and monopolar neurons in cultures of dissociated spiral ganglion.

Authors:  D S Whitlon; M Grover; J Tristano; T Williams; M T Coulson
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation induces selective survival of spiral ganglion neurons in neonatally deafened cats.

Authors:  P A Leake; G T Hradek; S J Rebscher; R L Snyder
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Effects of delayed treatment with combined GDNF and continuous electrical stimulation on spiral ganglion cell survival in deafened guinea pigs.

Authors:  Verena Scheper; Gerrit Paasche; Josef M Miller; Athanasia Warnecke; Nurdanat Berkingali; Thomas Lenarz; Timo Stöver
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Acceleration of age-related hearing loss by early noise exposure: evidence of a misspent youth.

Authors:  Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

1.  PLLA Coating of Active Implants for Dual Drug Release.

Authors:  Katharina Wulf; Madeleine Goblet; Stefan Raggl; Michael Teske; Thomas Eickner; Thomas Lenarz; Niels Grabow; Gerrit Paasche
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 4.411

2.  Differential Effects of Low- and High-Dose Dexamethasone on Electrically Induced Damage of the Cultured Organ of Corti.

Authors:  Marvin N Peter; Gerrit Paasche; Uta Reich; Thomas Lenarz; Athanasia Warnecke
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.911

3.  Electrical Stimulation Degenerated Cochlear Synapses Through Oxidative Stress in Neonatal Cochlear Explants.

Authors:  Qiong Liang; Na Shen; Bin Lai; Changjian Xu; Zengjun Sun; Zhengmin Wang; Shufeng Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Alginate-encapsulated brain-derived neurotrophic factor-overexpressing mesenchymal stem cells are a promising drug delivery system for protection of auditory neurons.

Authors:  Jana Schwieger; Anika Hamm; Michael M Gepp; André Schulz; Andrea Hoffmann; Thomas Lenarz; Verena Scheper
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 7.813

5.  Purification of Fibroblasts From the Spiral Ganglion.

Authors:  Annett Anacker; Karl-Heinz Esser; Thomas Lenarz; Gerrit Paasche
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.086

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.