Literature DB >> 23499141

Effects of thrust amplitude and duration of high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation on lumbar muscle spindle responses to vertebral position and movement.

Dong-Yuan Cao1, William R Reed, Cynthia R Long, Gregory N Kawchuk, Joel G Pickar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Mechanical characteristics of high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulations (HVLA-SMs) can vary. Sustained changes in peripheral neuronal signaling due to altered load transmission to a sensory receptor's local mechanical environment are often considered a mechanism contributing to the therapeutic effects of spinal manipulation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether variation in an HVLA-SM's thrust amplitude and duration alters the neural responsiveness of lumbar muscle spindles to either vertebral movement or position.
METHODS: Anesthetized cats (n = 112) received L6 HVLA-SMs delivered to the spinous process. Cats were divided into 6 cohorts depending upon the peak thrust force (25%, 55%, 85% body weight) or thrust displacement (1, 2, 3 mm) they received. Cats in each cohort received 8 thrust durations (0-250 milliseconds). Afferent discharge from 112 spindles was recorded in response to ramp and hold vertebral movement before and after the manipulation. Changes in mean instantaneous frequency (∆MIF) during the baseline period preceding the ramps (∆MIFresting), during ramp movement (∆MIFmovement), and with the vertebra held in the new position (∆MIFposition) were compared.
RESULTS: Thrust duration had a small but statistically significant effect on ∆MIFresting at all 6 thrust amplitudes compared with control (0-millisecond thrust duration). The lowest amplitude thrust displacement (1 mm) increased ∆MIFresting at all thrust durations. For all the other thrust displacements and forces, the direction of change in ∆MIFresting was not consistent, and the pattern of change was not systematically related to thrust duration. Regardless of thrust force, displacement, or duration, ∆MIFmovement and ∆MIFposition were not significantly different from control.
CONCLUSION: Relatively low-amplitude thrust displacements applied during an HVLA-SM produced sustained increases in the resting discharge of paraspinal muscle spindles regardless of the duration over which the thrust was applied. However, regardless of the HVLA-SM's thrust amplitude or duration, the responsiveness of paraspinal muscle spindles to vertebral movement and to a new vertebral position was not affected.
Copyright © 2013 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23499141      PMCID: PMC3752031          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  36 in total

1.  The frictional properties at the thoracic skin-fascia interface: implications in spine manipulation.

Authors:  David E Bereznick; J Kim Ross; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Three-dimensionality of direct contact forces in chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy.

Authors:  Gerrit G J M Van Zoest; Guy Gosselin
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 3.  Neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Biomechanics of spinal manipulative therapy.

Authors:  J J Triano
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Spinal projection of spindle afferents of the longissimus lumborum muscles of the cat.

Authors:  R Durbaba; A Taylor; P H Ellaway; S Rawlinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Position sensitivity of feline paraspinal muscle spindles to vertebral movement in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; Joel G Pickar; Weiginq Ge; Allyson Ianuzzi; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Preliminary investigation of the mechanisms underlying the effects of manipulation: exploration of a multivariate model including spinal stiffness, multifidus recruitment, and clinical findings.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Shane L Koppenhaver; Gregory N Kawchuk; Deydre S Teyhen; Jeffrey J Hebert; John D Childs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Experimental measurement of the force exerted during spinal manipulation using the Thompson technique.

Authors:  B W Hessell; W Herzog; P J Conway; M C McEwen
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 9.  Reliability of spinal palpation for diagnosis of back and neck pain: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael A Seffinger; Wadie I Najm; Shiraz I Mishra; Alan Adams; Vivian M Dickerson; Linda S Murphy; Sibylle Reinsch
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Don D Price; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2008-11-21
View more
  26 in total

1.  Characteristics of Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Mechanically Assisted Spinal Manipulation: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Randall S Sozio; Michael A K Liebschner; Joshua W Little; Maruti R Gudavalli
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Neural responses to the mechanical characteristics of high velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation: Effect of specific contact site.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2015-03-27

3.  The use of spinal manipulation to treat an acute on field athletic injury: a case report.

Authors:  Sean A Duquette; Mohsen Kazemi
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2016-06

4.  The effect of spinal manipulation impulse duration on spine neuromechanical responses.

Authors:  Isabelle Pagé; François Nougarou; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

5.  Effect of spinal manipulation on the development of history-dependent responsiveness of lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles in the cat.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

6.  Effect of spinal manipulation thrust magnitude on trunk mechanical activation thresholds of lateral thalamic neurons.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Randall S Sozio; Cynthia R Long
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Intervertebral Fixation and Segmental Thrust Level During Spinal Manipulation in an Animal Model.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Neural responses to the mechanical parameters of a high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation: effect of preload parameters.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Effect of changing lumbar stiffness by single facet joint dysfunction on the responsiveness of lumbar muscle spindles to vertebral movement.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Cynthia R Long
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-06

10.  Effects of unilateral facet fixation and facetectomy on muscle spindle responsiveness during simulated spinal manipulation in an animal model.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 1.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.