Literature DB >> 24932020

Effect of changing lumbar stiffness by single facet joint dysfunction on the responsiveness of lumbar muscle spindles to vertebral movement.

William R Reed1, Joel G Pickar1, Cynthia R Long1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Individuals experiencing low back pain often present clinically with intervertebral joint dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to determine whether relative changes in stiffness at a single spinal joint alters neural responsiveness of lumbar muscle spindles to either vertebral movement or position.
METHODS: Muscle spindle discharge was recorded in response to 1mm L6 ramp and hold movements (0.5mm/s) in the same animal for lumbar laminectomy-only (n=23), laminectomy & L5/6 facet screw (n=19), laminectomy & L5/6 facetectomy (n=5) conditions. Mean instantaneous frequency (MIF) was calculated for the ramp-up, hold, ramp-down and post-ramp phases during each joint condition.
RESULTS: Mean MIFs were not significantly different between the laminectomy-only and the other two types of joint dysfunction for the ramp-up, hold, ramp-down, or post-ramp phases.
CONCLUSION: Stiffness changes caused by single facet joint dysfunction failed to alter spindle responses during slow 1mm ramp and hold movements of the L6 vertebra.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chiropractic; joint; muscle spindle; stiffness

Year:  2014        PMID: 24932020      PMCID: PMC4025086     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc        ISSN: 0008-3194


  41 in total

1.  Correlations between joint and spinal mobility, spinal sagittal configuration, segmental mobility, segmental pain, symptoms and disabilities in female homecare personnel.

Authors:  G Lundberg; B Gerdle
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  2000-09

Review 2.  Neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 3.  The 2005 conference on the biology of manual therapies.

Authors:  Partap S Khalsa; Astrid Eberhart; Alyssa Cotler; Richard Nahin
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  Classification of longissimus lumborum muscle spindle afferents in the anaesthetized cat.

Authors:  R Durbaba; A Taylor; P H Ellaway; S Rawlinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Individuals with non-specific low back pain in an active episode demonstrate temporally altered torque responses and direction-specific enhanced muscle activity following unexpected balance perturbations.

Authors:  Stephanie L Jones; Juvena R Hitt; Michael J DeSarno; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program.

Authors:  Gregory E Hicks; Julie M Fritz; Anthony Delitto; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Disc lesions and the mechanics of the intervertebral joint complex.

Authors:  R E Thompson; M J Pearcy; K J Downing; B A Manthey; I H Parkinson; N L Fazzalari
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  A Radebold; J Cholewicki; M M Panjabi; T C Patel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Dynamic responsiveness of lumbar paraspinal muscle spindles during vertebral movement in the cat.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; Partap S Khalsa; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of thrust amplitude and duration of high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation on lumbar muscle spindle responses to vertebral position and movement.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.437

View more
  2 in total

1.  Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Intervertebral Fixation and Segmental Thrust Level During Spinal Manipulation in an Animal Model.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Effects of Thrust Magnitude and Duration on Immediate Postspinal Manipulation Trunk Muscle Spindle Responses.

Authors:  Carla R Lima; Randall S Sozio; AaMarryah C Law; Alicia J Nelson; Harshvardhan Singh; Christopher P Hurt; Peng Li; William R Reed
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 1.300

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.