Literature DB >> 25841562

Neural responses to the mechanical characteristics of high velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation: Effect of specific contact site.

William R Reed1, Cynthia R Long1, Gregory N Kawchuk2, Joel G Pickar3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systematic investigations are needed identifying how variability in the biomechanical characteristics of spinal manipulation affects physiological responses. Such knowledge may inform future clinical practice and research study design.
OBJECTIVE: To determine how contact site for high velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation (HVLA-SM) affects sensory input to the central nervous system.
DESIGN: HVLA-SM was applied to 4 specific anatomic locations using a no-HVLA-SM control at each location randomized in an 8×8 Latin square design in an animal model.
METHODS: Neural activity from muscle spindles in the multifidus and longissimus muscles were recorded from L6 dorsal rootlets in 16 anesthetized cats. A posterior to anterior HVLA-SM was applied through the intact skin overlying the L6 spinous process, lamina, inferior articular process and L7 spinous process. HVLA-SMs were preceded and followed by simulated spinal movement applied to the L6 vertebra. Change in mean instantaneous discharge frequency (ΔMIF) was determined during the thrust and the simulated spinal movement.
RESULTS: All contact sites increased L6 muscle spindle discharge during the thrust. Contact at all L6 sites significantly increased spindle discharge more than at the L7 site when recording at L6. There were no differences between L6 contact sites. For simulated movement, the L6 contact sites but not the L7 contact site significantly decreased L6 spindle responses to a change in vertebral position but not to movement to that position.
CONCLUSIONS: This animal study showed that contact site for an HVLA-SM can have a significant effect on the magnitude of sensory input arising from muscle spindles in the back.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose; Manual therapy; Muscle spindles; Specificity; Spinal manipulation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25841562      PMCID: PMC4584162          DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2015.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  49 in total

Review 1.  Neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Biomechanics of spinal manipulative therapy.

Authors:  J J Triano
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  High loading rate during spinal manipulation produces unique facet joint capsule strain patterns compared with axial rotations.

Authors:  Allyson Ianuzzi; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  Chiropractic patients in Denmark 2002: an expanded description and comparison with 1999 survey.

Authors:  Line Press Sorensen; Mette Jensen Stochkendahl; Jan Hartvigsen; Niels Grunnet Nilsson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 5.  Spinal manipulative therapy and somatosensory activation.

Authors:  J G Pickar; P S Bolton
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-02-19       Impact factor: 2.368

6.  Experimental measurement of the force exerted during spinal manipulation using the Thompson technique.

Authors:  B W Hessell; W Herzog; P J Conway; M C McEwen
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey.

Authors:  D M Eisenberg; R B Davis; S L Ettner; S Appel; S Wilkey; M Van Rompay; R C Kessler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-11       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Effects of thrust amplitude and duration of high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation on lumbar muscle spindle responses to vertebral position and movement.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Early use of thrust manipulation versus non-thrust manipulation: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Chad Cook; Kenneth Learman; Chris Showalter; Vincent Kabbaz; Bryan O'Halloran
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2012-10-02

10.  The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model.

Authors:  Joel E Bialosky; Mark D Bishop; Don D Price; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2008-11-21
View more
  17 in total

1.  Characteristics of Paraspinal Muscle Spindle Response to Mechanically Assisted Spinal Manipulation: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Randall S Sozio; Michael A K Liebschner; Joshua W Little; Maruti R Gudavalli
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Changes in Muscle Spasticity in Patients With Cerebral Palsy After Spinal Manipulation: Case Series.

Authors:  Oleh Kachmar; Taras Voloshyn; Mykhailo Hordiyevych
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-09-28

3.  Decreased spontaneous activity and altered evoked nociceptive response of rat thalamic submedius neurons to lumbar vertebra thrust.

Authors:  William R Reed; Jamie T Cranston; Stephen M Onifer; Joshua W Little; Randall S Sozio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Neural Responses to Physical Characteristics of a High-velocity, Low-amplitude Spinal Manipulation: Effect of Thrust Direction.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Randall S Sozio; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Effects of Thrust Magnitude and Duration on Immediate Postspinal Manipulation Trunk Muscle Spindle Responses.

Authors:  Carla R Lima; Randall S Sozio; AaMarryah C Law; Alicia J Nelson; Harshvardhan Singh; Christopher P Hurt; Peng Li; William R Reed
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 1.300

6.  Short-Term Effects of Thoracic Spine Manipulation on the Biomechanical Organisation of Gait Initiation: A Randomized Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sébastien Ditcharles; Eric Yiou; Arnaud Delafontaine; Alain Hamaoui
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Influence of Spinal Manipulation on Muscle Spasticity and Manual Dexterity in Participants With Cerebral Palsy: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Oleh Kachmar; Anna Kushnir; Oles Matiushenko; Marko Hasiuk
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2018-08-28

Review 8.  The contemporary model of vertebral column joint dysfunction and impact of high-velocity, low-amplitude controlled vertebral thrusts on neuromuscular function.

Authors:  Heidi Haavik; Nitika Kumari; Kelly Holt; Imran Khan Niazi; Imran Amjad; Amit N Pujari; Kemal Sitki Türker; Bernadette Murphy
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Neural Response During a Mechanically Assisted Spinal Manipulation in an Animal Model: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  William R Reed; Michael A K Liebschner; Randall S Sozio; Joel G Pickar; Maruti R Gudavalli
Journal:  J Nov Physiother Phys Rehabil       Date:  2015-04-06

10.  Spinal Tissue Loading Created by Different Methods of Spinal Manipulative Therapy Application.

Authors:  Martha Funabashi; François Nougarou; Martin Descarreaux; Narasimha Prasad; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.