Literature DB >> 23495271

Reverse technique for I-gel supraglottic airway insertion.

Indu Sen1, Neerja Bhardwaj, Ys Latha.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23495271      PMCID: PMC3590523          DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.105826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0970-9185


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, The I-gel™ (Intersurgical Ltd, Wokingham, UK) is a single-use extraglottic airway device with a non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent.[1] The device is used for maintaining the patency of airway during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for short surgical procedures and as a conduit for endotracheal tube insertion in difficult airway. I-gel has been compared with other extraglottic airway devices for ease of insertion. Most airway training manikin studies report a high success rate of >95%, even by inexperienced personnel.[12] When I-gel was used for airway management in adult patients, a first time success rate of 86% has been reported.[3] Authors required 53 manipulations in 26 patients to achieve a clear airway. A problem of tongue folding during I-gel placement has been reported, though the patient had adequate mouth opening and full set of dentition.[4] We successfully used the reverse insertion technique for I-gel airway in a 30-year-old woman, scheduled for hysteroscopic dilatation and curettage. The technique has been previously described for the insertion of Guedel's airway and classic Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA).[5] Our patient received an induction dose of propofol, and I-gel was initially inserted orally using the standard insertion technique. However, the device could not be positioned properly due to repeated tongue folding. A reverse insertion technique, as reported for classic LMA, was then tried. The I-gel was inserted with concavity facing toward the hard palate. On reaching oropharynx, the device was rotated 180° and placed in its final position to facilitate positive pressure ventilation. This method is easy to use, atraumatic, and may be used for I-gel insertion if first attempt by classic technique fails.
  5 in total

1.  Insertion of the i-gel airway obstructed by the tongue.

Authors:  Susheela Taxak; Ajith Gopinath
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  A comparison of the I-gel supraglottic airway as a conduit for tracheal intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask airway: a manikin study.

Authors:  P Michalek; W Donaldson; C Graham; J D Hinds
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  A comparison of the i-gel and classic LMA insertion in manikins by experienced and novice physicians.

Authors:  Konstantinos Stroumpoulis; Christina Isaia; Eleni Bassiakou; Ioannis Pantazopoulos; Georgios Troupis; Antonios Mazarakis; Theano Demestiha; Theodoros Xanthos
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.799

4.  Evaluation of the size 4 i-gel airway in one hundred non-paralysed patients.

Authors:  J J Gatward; T M Cook; C Seller; J Handel; T Simpson; V Vanek; F Kelly
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: comparison between rotational, lateral and standard technique.

Authors:  Babita Ghai; Jeetinder Kaur Makkar; Neerja Bhardwaj; Jyotsna Wig
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.556

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  A prospective randomised trial to compare three insertion techniques for i-gel™ placement: Standard, reverse, and rotation.

Authors:  Mamta Bhardwaj; Suresh K Singhal; Amit Dahiya
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-07-01

2.  i-gel insertion with modified jaw thrust technique.

Authors:  Dileep Kumar; Muhammad Hayat; Ausaf Khan
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2015-02

3.  Insertion of i-gel™ by the reversed technique improves the success rate and reduces the time taken for its placement: A prospective, randomized, controlled, interventional trial.

Authors:  Megha Sharda; Mukul Chandra Kapoor; Rakesh Atray; Swaraj Garg
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.