Literature DB >> 18315636

Laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: comparison between rotational, lateral and standard technique.

Babita Ghai1, Jeetinder Kaur Makkar, Neerja Bhardwaj, Jyotsna Wig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to compare the success and ease of insertion of three techniques of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion; the standard Brain technique, a lateral technique with cuff partially inflated and a rotational technique with cuff partially inflated.
METHODS: One hundred and sixty-eight ASA I and II children aged 6 months to 6 years undergoing short elective surgical procedures lasting 40-60 min were included in the study. A standard anesthesia protocol was followed for all patients. Patients were randomly allocated into one of the three groups i.e. standard (S), rotational (R) and lateral (L). The primary outcome measure of the study was success rate at the first attempt using three techniques of LMA insertion. Secondary outcomes measures studied were overall success rate, time before successful LMA insertion, complications and maneuvers used to relieve airway obstruction.
RESULTS: Successful insertion at the first attempt was significantly higher in group R (96%) compared with group L (84%) and group S (80%) (P = 0.03). Overall success rate (i.e. successful insertion with two attempts) was 100% for group R, 93% for group L and 87% for group S (P = 0.03). Time for successful insertion was significantly lower in group R compared with group L and S (P < 0.001). The incidence of complications was lower in group R.
CONCLUSIONS: A rotational technique with partially inflated cuff is associated with the highest success rate of insertion and lowest incidence of complications and could be the technique of first choice for LMA insertion in pediatric patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18315636     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02434.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  8 in total

1.  Laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults: comparison between fully deflated and partially inflated technique.

Authors:  Jiwon An; Seo Kyung Shin; Ki Jun Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.759

2.  Anaesthesia management in foetus-ex-fetu.

Authors:  Kundan Sandugir Gosavi; Mb Prashantha; Bharati D Kondwilkar; Nitinkumar P Dhende
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-03

3.  A simple method of partial inflation of the LMA cuff before insertion in children to allow cuff pressure without adjustment after insertion.

Authors:  Bo-Eun Moon; Min-Soo Kim; Jeong Rim Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-06-19

4.  Insertion of i-gel™ by the reversed technique improves the success rate and reduces the time taken for its placement: A prospective, randomized, controlled, interventional trial.

Authors:  Megha Sharda; Mukul Chandra Kapoor; Rakesh Atray; Swaraj Garg
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Optimal dose of succinylcholine for laryngeal mask airway insertion: systematic review, meta-analysis and metaregression of randomised control trials.

Authors:  Alan Hsi-Wen Liao; Yu-Cih Lin; Chyi-Huey Bai; Chien-Yu Chen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Comparison of Air-QⓇ insertion techniques in pediatric patients with fiber-optic bronchoscopic assessment: a prospective randomized control trial.

Authors:  Manasa Gaddam; Sameer Sethi; Aditi Jain; Vikas Saini
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-06-04

7.  Reverse technique for I-gel supraglottic airway insertion.

Authors:  Indu Sen; Neerja Bhardwaj; Ys Latha
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01

Review 8.  Standard versus Rotation Technique for Insertion of Supraglottic Airway Devices: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jin Ha Park; Jong Seok Lee; Sang Beom Nam; Jin Wu Ju; Min Soo Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.759

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.