RATIONALE: Mass spectrometry based comparative glycomics is essential for disease biomarker discovery. However, developing a reliable quantification method is still a challenging task. METHODS: We here report an isotopic labeling strategy employing stable isotopic iodomethane for comparative glycomic profiling by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS). N-Glycans released from model glycoproteins and blood serum samples were permethylated with iodomethane ('light') and iodomethane-d1 or -d3 ('heavy') reagents. Permethylated samples were then mixed at equal volumes prior to LC/ESI-MS analysis. RESULTS: Peak intensity ratios of N-glycans isotopically permethylated (Heavy/Light, H/L) were almost equal to the theoretical values. Observed differences were mainly related to the purity of 'heavy' iodomethane reagents (iodomethane-d1 or -d3). The data suggested the efficacy of this strategy to simultaneously quantify N-glycans derived from biological samples representing different cohorts. Accordingly, this strategy is effective in comparing multiple samples in a single LC/ESI-MS analysis. The potential of this strategy for defining glycomic differences in blood serum samples representing different esophageal diseases was explored. CONCLUSIONS: LC/ESI-MS comparative glycomic profiling of isotopically permethylated N-glycans derived from biological samples and glycoproteins reliably defined glycan changes associated with biological conditions or glycoproteins expression. As a biological application, this strategy permitted the reliable quantification of glycomic changes associated with different esophageal diseases, including high grade dysplasia, Barrett's disease, and esophageal adenocarcinoma.
RATIONALE: Mass spectrometry based comparative glycomics is essential for disease biomarker discovery. However, developing a reliable quantification method is still a challenging task. METHODS: We here report an isotopic labeling strategy employing stable isotopic iodomethane for comparative glycomic profiling by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS). N-Glycans released from model glycoproteins and blood serum samples were permethylated with iodomethane ('light') and iodomethane-d1 or -d3 ('heavy') reagents. Permethylated samples were then mixed at equal volumes prior to LC/ESI-MS analysis. RESULTS: Peak intensity ratios of N-glycans isotopically permethylated (Heavy/Light, H/L) were almost equal to the theoretical values. Observed differences were mainly related to the purity of 'heavy' iodomethane reagents (iodomethane-d1 or -d3). The data suggested the efficacy of this strategy to simultaneously quantify N-glycans derived from biological samples representing different cohorts. Accordingly, this strategy is effective in comparing multiple samples in a single LC/ESI-MS analysis. The potential of this strategy for defining glycomic differences in blood serum samples representing different esophageal diseases was explored. CONCLUSIONS: LC/ESI-MS comparative glycomic profiling of isotopically permethylated N-glycans derived from biological samples and glycoproteins reliably defined glycan changes associated with biological conditions or glycoproteins expression. As a biological application, this strategy permitted the reliable quantification of glycomic changes associated with different esophageal diseases, including high grade dysplasia, Barrett's disease, and esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Authors: Zuzana Kyselova; Yehia Mechref; Mohammad M Al Bataineh; Lacey E Dobrolecki; Robert J Hickey; Jake Vinson; Christopher J Sweeney; Milos V Novotny Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2007-04-14 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Hyun Joo An; Scott R Kronewitter; Maria Lorna A de Leoz; Carlito B Lebrilla Journal: Curr Opin Chem Biol Date: 2009-09-21 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Ron Orlando; Jae-Min Lim; James A Atwood; Peggi M Angel; Meng Fang; Kazuhiro Aoki; Gerardo Alvarez-Manilla; Kelley W Moremen; William S York; Michael Tiemeyer; Michael Pierce; Stephen Dalton; Lance Wells Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: D Isailovic; R T Kurulugama; M D Plasencia; S T Stokes; Z Kyselova; R Goldman; Y Mechref; M V Novotny; D E Clemmer Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Maria Lorna A de Leoz; Hyun Joo An; Scott Kronewitter; Jaehan Kim; Sean Beecroft; Ruth Vinall; Suzanne Miyamoto; Ralph de Vere White; Kit S Lam; Carlito Lebrilla Journal: Dis Markers Date: 2008 Impact factor: 3.434
Authors: Norelle C Wildburger; Shiyue Zhou; Lauren G Zacharias; Roger A Kroes; Joseph R Moskal; Mary Schmidt; Parvin Mirzaei; Joy Gumin; Frederick F Lang; Yehia Mechref; Carol L Nilsson Journal: J Proteome Res Date: 2015-08-04 Impact factor: 4.466
Authors: Alok K Shah; Kim-Anh Lê Cao; Eunju Choi; David Chen; Benoît Gautier; Derek Nancarrow; David C Whiteman; Nicholas A Saunders; Andrew P Barbour; Virendra Joshi; Michelle M Hill Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Shiyue Zhou; Yunli Hu; Lucas Veillon; Sergei I Snovida; John C Rogers; Julian Saba; Yehia Mechref Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 6.986