Literature DB >> 23494334

[Imaging of the prostate].

J Walz1, T Loch, G Salomon, H Wijkstra.   

Abstract

Recently several new technologies for prostate imaging have been developed. The aim of these technologies was to improve the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Especially the transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) has been refined to the so-called enhanced ultrasound, as regular grey scale TRUS has limited ability to identify cancer lesions in the prostate. In several studies elastography has shown good capability to identify cancer lesions in the prostate as well as to absolutely increase the detection rate of randomized biopsies by up to 10 %.. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound shows varying results in the published literature with increased detection rates on the one hand and unchanged detection rates relative to randomized biopsy on the other hand. The online available ANNA/C-TRUS system shows detection rates with six targeted biopsies that are comparable to the published detection rates of randomized saturation biopsies. Direct systematic comparison to randomized biopsies is missing. The Histoscanning system currently provides the poorest data as no biopsy studies are available. Multicenter trials are mandatory for all new imaging technologies in order to implement them as standard into clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23494334     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-012-3103-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  29 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced transrectal ultrasound modalities in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Edouard J Trabulsi; Daniel Sackett; Leonard G Gomella; Ethan J Halpern
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Comparative efficiency of contrast-enhanced colour Doppler ultrasound targeted versus systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Michael Josef Mitterberger; Friedrich Aigner; Wolfgang Horninger; Hanno Ulmer; Silvio Cavuto; Ethan J Halpern; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  First results of endocavity evaluation of the microvascularization of malignant prostate tumors using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) including perfusion analysis: first results.

Authors:  E M Jung; P Wiggermann; C Greis; F Eder; J Ehrich; W Jung; A G Schreyer; C Stroszczynski; R Ganzer
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  [Improvement of transrectal ultrasound. Artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) in detection and staging of prostatic carcinoma].

Authors:  T Loch; I Leuschner; C Genberg; K Weichert-Jacobsen; F Küppers; M Retz; J Lehmann; E Yfantis; M Evans; V Tsarev; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  The impact of real-time elastography guiding a systematic prostate biopsy to improve cancer detection rate: a prospective study of 353 patients.

Authors:  Marko Brock; Christian von Bodman; Rein Jüri Palisaar; Björn Löppenberg; Florian Sommerer; Thomas Deix; Joachim Noldus; Thilo Eggert
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Shear wave ultrasound elastography of the prostate: initial results.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Richard Memo; Carl R Schaub
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.657

8.  Computerized transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) of the prostate: detection of cancer in patients with multiple negative systematic random biopsies.

Authors:  Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Sonoelastography of the prostate: comparison with systematic biopsy findings in 492 patients.

Authors:  Leo Pallwein; Michael Mitterberger; Germar Pinggera; Friedrich Aigner; Florian Pedross; Johann Gradl; Alexandre Pelzer; Georg Bartsch; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Novel contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Martijn Smeenge; Massimo Mischi; M Pilar Laguna Pes; Jean J M C H de la Rosette; Hessel Wijkstra
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of image-guided targeted biopsies versus systematic randomized biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic literature review of well-designed studies.

Authors:  Antoine van Hove; Pierre-Henri Savoie; Charlotte Maurin; Serge Brunelle; Gwenaëlle Gravis; Naji Salem; Jochen Walz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Innovations in diagnostic imaging of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Karl Pummer; Malte Rieken; Herbert Augustin; Thomas Gutschi; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arnoud Postema; Massimo Mischi; Jean de la Rosette; Hessel Wijkstra
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.226

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.