Literature DB >> 10957776

[Improvement of transrectal ultrasound. Artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) in detection and staging of prostatic carcinoma].

T Loch1, I Leuschner, C Genberg, K Weichert-Jacobsen, F Küppers, M Retz, J Lehmann, E Yfantis, M Evans, V Tsarev, M Stöckle.   

Abstract

As a result of the enhanced clinical application of prostate specific antigen (PSA), an increasing number of men are becoming candidates for prostate cancer work-up. A high PSA value over 20 ng/ml is a good indicator of the presence of prostate cancer, but within the range of 4-10 ng/ml, it is rather unreliable. Even more alarming is the fact that prostate cancer has been found in 12-37% of patients with a "normal" PSA value of under 4 ng/ml (Hybritech). While PSA is capable of indicating a statistical risk of prostate cancer in a defined patient population, it is not able to localize cancer within the prostate gland or guide a biopsy needle to a suspicious area. This necessitates an additional effective diagnostic technique that is able to localize or rule out a malignant growth within the prostate. The methods available for the detection of these prostate cancers are digital rectal examination (DRE) and Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). DRE is not suitable for early detection, as about 70% of the palpable malignancies have already spread beyond the prostate. The classic problem of visual interpretation of TRUS images is that hypoechoic areas suspicious for cancer may be either normal or cancerous histologically. Moreover, about 25% of all cancers have been found to be isoechoic and therefore not distinguishable from normal-appearing areas. None of the current biopsy or imaging techniques are able to cope with this dilemma. Artificial neural networks (ANN) are complex nonlinear computational models, designed much like the neuronal organization of a brain. These networks are able to model complicated biologic relationships without making assumptions based on conventional statistical distributions. Applications in Medicine and Urology have been promising. One example of such an application will be discussed in detail: A new method of Artificial Neural Network Analysis (ANNA) was employed in an attempt to obtain existing subvisual information, other than the gray scale, from conventional TRUS and to improve the accuracy of prostate cancer identification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10957776     DOI: 10.1007/s001200050367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  13 in total

1.  [Transrectal ultrasound of the prostate. Current status and prospects].

Authors:  M Zacharias; K V Jenderka; H Heynemann; P Fornara
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Multiparametric MRI, elastography, contrastenhanced TRUS. Are there indications with reliable diagnostic advantages before prostate biopsy?].

Authors:  A Hegele; L Skrobek; R Hofmann; P Olbert
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  An automated neural-fuzzy approach to malignant tumor localization in 2D ultrasonic images of the prostate.

Authors:  Samar Samir Mohamed; J M Li; M M A Salama; G H Freeman; H R Tizhoosh; A Fenster; K Rizkalla
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  [Imaging of the prostate].

Authors:  J Walz; T Loch; G Salomon; H Wijkstra
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Prostate cancer diagnostics: innovative imaging in case of multiple negative biopsies.

Authors:  Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  [Innovative concepts in early cancer detection and staging of localized prostate cancer].

Authors:  L Rinnab; R Küfer; R E Hautmann; B G Volkmer; M Straub; N M Blumstein; H W Gottfried
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Computerized transrectal ultrasound of the prostate in a multicenter setup (C-TRUS-MS): detection of cancer after multiple negative systematic random and in primary biopsies.

Authors:  Bjoern Grabski; Leif Baeurle; Annemie Loch; Bjoern Wefer; Udo Paul; Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  [Core needle biopsy twice negative with rising PSA level. Does imaging help?].

Authors:  T Loch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Combination of C-TRUS with multiparametric MRI: potential for improving detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  T Strunk; G Decker; W Willinek; S C Mueller; S Rogenhofer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Computerized transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) of the prostate: detection of cancer in patients with multiple negative systematic random biopsies.

Authors:  Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.