Literature DB >> 20719368

Enhanced transrectal ultrasound modalities in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Edouard J Trabulsi1, Daniel Sackett, Leonard G Gomella, Ethan J Halpern.   

Abstract

Standard grayscale transrectal ultrasound has a poor sensitivity for detection of prostate cancer. Saturation biopsy schemes have improved prostate cancer detection rates over standard template biopsy schemes, but carry additional morbidity and cost. Enhanced ultrasound modalities (EUM), including color and power Doppler, contrast-enhancement, harmonic and flash replenishment imaging, and elastography have demonstrated improved prostate cancer detection. EUM targeting areas with increased or abnormal vascularity or firmness for biopsy offer improved prostate cancer detection. EUM, detect prostate cancer more efficiently than standard ultrasound guided biopsies. These emerging technologies may potentially augment standard prostate biopsy in clinical practice.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20719368     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  14 in total

Review 1.  Image guidance in the focal treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anthony N Hoang; Dmitry Volkin; Nitin K Yerram; Srinivas Vourganti; Jeffrey Nix; W Marston Linehan; Bradford Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 2.  Image-guided robotic interventions for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ashwin N Sridhar; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Erik K Mayer; Philip J Pratt; Philip J Edwards; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara W Darzi; Justin A Vale
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  [Imaging of the prostate].

Authors:  J Walz; T Loch; G Salomon; H Wijkstra
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  A 5-MHz cylindrical dual-layer transducer array for 3-D transrectal ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Yuling Chen; Man Nguyen; Jesse T Yen
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.578

Review 5.  [Ultrasonography of the prostate gland : From B‑image through multiparametric ultrasound to targeted biopsy].

Authors:  F Steinkohl; A Luger; J Bektic; F Aigner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  The evolving role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in urology: a review.

Authors:  Andrew Salib; Ethan Halpern; John Eisenbrey; Thenappan Chandrasekar; Paul H Chung; Flemming Forsberg; Edouard J Trabulsi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  Prostate cancer: a comparison of the diagnostic performance of transrectal ultrasound versus contrast enhanced transrectal ultrasound in different clinical characteristics.

Authors:  Hongli Li; Jianguo Xia; Shaowei Xie; Yifen Guo; Mei Xin; Fenghua Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

Review 8.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in interventional oncology.

Authors:  Sriharsha Gummadi; John R Eisenbrey; Andrej Lyshchik
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-11

9.  Simultaneous functional photoacoustic and ultrasonic endoscopy of internal organs in vivo.

Authors:  Joon-Mo Yang; Christopher Favazza; Ruimin Chen; Junjie Yao; Xin Cai; Konstantin Maslov; Qifa Zhou; K Kirk Shung; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sandeep S Hedgire; Tamara N Oei; Shaunagh McDermott; Kai Cao; Zena Patel M; Mukesh G Harisinghani
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2012-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.