Literature DB >> 23480314

Go Red for Women cardiovascular health-screening evaluation: the dichotomy between awareness and perception of cardiovascular risk in the community.

Juliana M Kling1, Virginia M Miller, Rekha Mankad, Susan Wilansky, Qing Wu, Teresa G Zais, Kathleen K Zarling, Thomas G Allison, Sharon L Mulvagh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of death in U.S. women. Although women are becoming more aware of CV disease, there remains a dichotomy between awareness and perceived risk. We sought to characterize this dichotomy in women attracted to a CV health-screening event, in order to improve strategies to reduce CV risk.
METHODS: During CV health events held in Rochester, Minnesota, from 2007 through 2011, 294 women underwent screening for blood chemistry, body mass index, and blood pressure. Participants also completed surveys about knowledge of CV disease, risk factors, and perceived risk. Risk level was determined from the 2011 American Heart Association Effectiveness-Based Guidelines for Women.
RESULTS: Among participants (age, mean [standard deviation], 53 [15.3] years; white, 98%), 99% were aware that CV disease is the leading cause of death in women. Almost half (47%) perceived themselves to be at personal risk, although 65% were determined to be "at risk" and 12% to be at "high risk" according to guidelines, while 22% were uncategorized. Of the 228 participants "at risk" or "high risk," 48% and 21%, respectively, did not perceive themselves to be at any risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Women attracted to CV health events were aware that CV disease is the leading cause of death for women. However, the magnitude of awareness did not directly translate into perception or understanding of actual personal risk. To decrease the rate of CV disease in women, continued efforts are needed to personalize the importance of, and the methods for reducing, CV risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23480314     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  10 in total

1.  Outcomes of a Clinic-Based Educational Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention by Race, Ethnicity, and Urban/Rural Status.

Authors:  Amparo C Villablanca; Christina Slee; Liana Lianov; Daniel Tancredi
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 2.  Cardiac Rehabilitation for Women: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Solutions.

Authors:  Marta Supervía; Jose R Medina-Inojosa; Colin Yeung; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Ray W Squires; Carmen M Pérez-Terzic; LaPrincess C Brewer; Shawn E Leth; Randal J Thomas
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Do Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors Differ By Rural Classification in Women Who Enroll in a Weight Loss Intervention?

Authors:  Dieu-My Thi Tran; Carol H Pullen; Lani M Zimmerman; Patricia A Hageman
Journal:  Online J Rural Nurs Health Care       Date:  2015

4.  Biopsychosocial health disparities among young women enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Theresa M Beckie; Gerald Fletcher; Maureen W Groer; Kevin E Kip; Ming Ji
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.081

5.  Awareness of cardiovascular disease associated risk factors among Saudis in Riyadh City.

Authors:  Ahmed H Mujamammi; Yousef M Alluhaymid; Mohammed G Alshibani; Fawzan Y Alotaibi; Khalid M Alzahrani; Abdulmajeed B Alotaibi; Ahmed A Almasabi; Essa M Sabi
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-06-30

Review 6.  Statin Adherence: Does Gender Matter?

Authors:  Karen M Goldstein; Leah L Zullig; Lori A Bastian; Hayden B Bosworth
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 7.  The Challenges of Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women.

Authors:  LaPrincess C Brewer; Anna Svatikova; Sharon L Mulvagh
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.727

8.  Perceived lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease (from the Dallas Heart Study).

Authors:  Elisabeth Joye Petr; Colby R Ayers; Ambarish Pandey; James A de Lemos; Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Amit Khera; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Jarett D Berry
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 9.  Big Data in Cardiology: State-of-Art and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Haijiang Dai; Arwa Younis; Jude Dzevela Kong; Luca Puce; Georges Jabbour; Hong Yuan; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-01

10.  Association between perceived lifetime risk of cardiovascular disease and calculated risk in a male population in Brazil.

Authors:  Mário Maciel de Lima; Glaciane Rocha da Silva; Sebastião Salazar Jensem Filho; Fabiana Granja
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2016-06-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.