Literature DB >> 26161046

Do Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors Differ By Rural Classification in Women Who Enroll in a Weight Loss Intervention?

Dieu-My Thi Tran1, Carol H Pullen1, Lani M Zimmerman2, Patricia A Hageman3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: If clinicians and researchers are aware of specific cardiovascular risks associated with women's rural status, whether it be large or small/isolated rural areas, it may help in developing more relevant rural resources. The purpose of this study was to examine whether there were differences in modifiable cardiovascular risk factors of overweight and obese rural women living in large or small/isolated rural areas. SAMPLE: This secondary analysis examined baseline cross-sectional data from the "Web-based Weight Loss and Weight Maintenance Intervention for Older Rural Women" clinical trial. Analysis included data from 299 rural Midwestern women, ages 40-69 years with a baseline body mass index of 28-45 kg/m2, who provided rural classification data and were randomized into groups.
METHODS: Demographic and biomarker baseline data were used. Chi-square and independent t-tests were used for data analyses.
FINDINGS: There are no significant differences found in overweight and obese women with cardiovascular risk factors when compared to rural classification, with one exception. Total cholesterol was associated with rural classification (p=0.047), where women living in large rural areas were more likely to have elevated total cholesterol levels (≥240 mg/dL) compared to women living in small/isolated areas (18.5% vs. 10.0%, respectively). Demographic characteristics such as age and education demonstrated no significant differences by rural classification; however, the majority of women in this study were of high socioeconomic status.
CONCLUSIONS: Although this secondary analysis found that rural women have similar cardiovascular risk factors and demographic characteristics, this study highlights the need for clinicians to carefully consider the rural community characteristics for primary prevention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular risk factors; middle-aged and older women; rural classification

Year:  2015        PMID: 26161046      PMCID: PMC4494758          DOI: 10.14574/ojrnhc.v15i1.339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Online J Rural Nurs Health Care        ISSN: 1539-3399


  16 in total

1.  Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  A national study of obesity prevalence and trends by type of rural county.

Authors:  J Elizabeth Jackson; Mark P Doescher; Anthony F Jerant; L Gary Hart
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 3.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; David Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Pamela J Schreiner; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Gender differences in cardiovascular risk factors and risk perception among individuals with diabetes.

Authors:  Carol J Homko; Linda Zamora; William P Santamore; Abul Kashem; Timothy McConnell; Alfred A Bove
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 2.140

5.  Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women--2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Lori Mosca; Emelia J Benjamin; Kathy Berra; Judy L Bezanson; Rowena J Dolor; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; L Kristin Newby; Ileana L Piña; Véronique L Roger; Leslee J Shaw; Dong Zhao; Theresa M Beckie; Cheryl Bushnell; Jeanine D'Armiento; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Jing Fang; Theodore G Ganiats; Antoinette S Gomes; Clarisa R Gracia; Constance K Haan; Elizabeth A Jackson; Debra R Judelson; Ellie Kelepouris; Carl J Lavie; Anne Moore; Nancy A Nussmeier; Elizabeth Ofili; Suzanne Oparil; Pamela Ouyang; Vivian W Pinn; Katherine Sherif; Sidney C Smith; George Sopko; Nisha Chandra-Strobos; Elaine M Urbina; Viola Vaccarino; Nanette K Wenger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  The frequency and distribution of cardiovascular disease risk factors among Nebraska women enrolled in the WISEWOMAN screening program.

Authors:  Shingairai A Feresu; Wanqing Zhang; Susan E Puumala; Fred Ullrich; James R Anderson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Go Red for Women cardiovascular health-screening evaluation: the dichotomy between awareness and perception of cardiovascular risk in the community.

Authors:  Juliana M Kling; Virginia M Miller; Rekha Mankad; Susan Wilansky; Qing Wu; Teresa G Zais; Kathleen K Zarling; Thomas G Allison; Sharon L Mulvagh
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Web-based interventions for weight loss and weight maintenance among rural midlife and older women: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Patricia A Hageman; Carol H Pullen; Melody Hertzog; Linda S Boeckner; Susan Noble Walker
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Negativity towards negative results: a discussion of the disconnect between scientific worth and scientific culture.

Authors:  Natalie Matosin; Elisabeth Frank; Martin Engel; Jeremy S Lum; Kelly A Newell
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.758

10.  Prevalence of the American Heart Association's "ideal cardiovascular health" metrics in a rural, cross-sectional, community-based study: the Heart of New Ulm Project.

Authors:  Jacqueline I Kim; Arthur Sillah; Jackie L Boucher; Abbey C Sidebottom; Thomas Knickelbine
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.