Karen M Goldstein1,2, Leah L Zullig3,4, Lori A Bastian5,6, Hayden B Bosworth3,4,7,8,9. 1. Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA. Karen.goldstein@duke.edu. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Karen.goldstein@duke.edu. 3. Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA. 4. Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 5. Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities, and Education (PRIME) Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. 7. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 8. School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 9. Center for Population Health Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) continues to be the leading cause of death for men and women in the USA. Statins have contributed significantly to noted declines in cardiovascular-related mortality in the last decade; however, the benefit of statins is inequitable across genders. Women continue to be less likely to take statins and to meet target LDL goals than men. As a possible contributing factor to this disparity, we explore the evidence for gender-based differences in provision of, and adherence to statins. RECENT FINDINGS: Compared with men, women are less likely to adhere to statins. Potential reasons for this gender difference in use of statins can be observed across all phases of adherence including both intentional and unintentional non-adherence. Notable gender-specific contributing factors for statin non-adherence include decreased provider and patient awareness of CVD risk among women, higher risk of statin intolerance among women, and competing demands associated with family caregiving responsibilities. Similar to limitations in the broader CVD literature, there is inadequate inclusion of gender-specific analyses in statin-related trials. Gender-based disparities in statin adherence can be linked to both provider level, psychosocial, and medication intolerance factors. Interventions designed to improve statin adherence should take gender-specific challenges into consideration such as women being older at the time of increased CVD risk, higher rates of statin intolerance, and potentially greater caregiving responsibilities.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) continues to be the leading cause of death for men and women in the USA. Statins have contributed significantly to noted declines in cardiovascular-related mortality in the last decade; however, the benefit of statins is inequitable across genders. Women continue to be less likely to take statins and to meet target LDL goals than men. As a possible contributing factor to this disparity, we explore the evidence for gender-based differences in provision of, and adherence to statins. RECENT FINDINGS: Compared with men, women are less likely to adhere to statins. Potential reasons for this gender difference in use of statins can be observed across all phases of adherence including both intentional and unintentional non-adherence. Notable gender-specific contributing factors for statin non-adherence include decreased provider and patient awareness of CVD risk among women, higher risk of statin intolerance among women, and competing demands associated with family caregiving responsibilities. Similar to limitations in the broader CVD literature, there is inadequate inclusion of gender-specific analyses in statin-related trials. Gender-based disparities in statin adherence can be linked to both provider level, psychosocial, and medication intolerance factors. Interventions designed to improve statin adherence should take gender-specific challenges into consideration such as women being older at the time of increased CVD risk, higher rates of statin intolerance, and potentially greater caregiving responsibilities.
Authors: Shilpa Agrawal; Jennifer Van Eyk; Kimia Sobhani; Janet Wei; C Noel Bairey Merz Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: William H Shrank; Niteesh K Choudhry; Angela Tong; Jessica Myers; Michael A Fischer; Kellie Swanton; Julie Slezak; Troyen A Brennan; Joshua N Liberman; Susan Moffit; Jerry Avorn; Daniel Carpenter Journal: Med Care Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Martin W Schoen; Rachel G Tabak; Joanne Salas; Jeffrey F Scherrer; Fred R Buckhold Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Varsha G Vimalananda; Donald R Miller; Timothy P Hofer; Robert G Holleman; Mandi L Klamerus; Eve A Kerr Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Abdulla Shehab; Bayan Al-Dabbagh; Khalid F AlHabib; Alawi A Alsheikh-Ali; Wael Almahmeed; Kadhim Sulaiman; Ahmed Al-Motarreb; Nicolaas Nagelkerke; Jassim Al Suwaidi; Ahmad Hersi; Hussam Al Faleh; Nidal Asaad; Shukri Al Saif; Haitham Amin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Martin Wawruch; Dusan Zatko; Gejza Wimmer; Jan Luha; Sona Wimmerova; Petra Matalova; Peter Kukumberg; Jan Murin; Tomas Tesar; Beata Havelkova; Rashmi Shah Journal: Clin Drug Investig Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 2.859
Authors: Martin Wawruch; Gejza Wimmer; Jan Murin; Martina Paduchova; Tomas Tesar; Lubica Hlinkova; Peter Slavkovsky; Lubomira Fabryova; Emma Aarnio Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Derek Larson; Seung Hyun Won; Anuradha Ganesan; Ryan C Maves; Karl Kronmann; Jason F Okulicz; Xiuping Chu; Christina Schofield; Thomas O'Bryan; Brian K Agan; Robert Deiss Journal: HIV Med Date: 2021-10-26 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Aisha Vadhariya; Marc L Fleming; Michael L Johnson; E James Essien; Omar Serna; Tara Esse; Jeannie Choi; Susan H Boklage; Susan M Abughosh Journal: Am Health Drug Benefits Date: 2019 Jun-Jul
Authors: Marit de Jong; Rimke C Vos; Rianneke de Ritter; Carla J van der Kallen; Simone J Sep; Mark Woodward; Coen DA Stehouwer; Michiel L Bots; Sanne Ae Peters Journal: BJGP Open Date: 2019-07-23
Authors: Marit de Jong; Marieke J Oskam; Simone J S Sep; Behiye Ozcan; Femke Rutters; Eric J G Sijbrands; Petra J M Elders; Sarah E Siegelaar; J Hans DeVries; Cees J Tack; Marielle Schroijen; Harold W de Valk; Evertine J Abbink; Coen D A Stehouwer; Ingrid Jazet; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel; Sanne A E Peters; Miranda T Schram Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2020-10