Literature DB >> 25412222

Biopsychosocial health disparities among young women enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation.

Theresa M Beckie1, Gerald Fletcher, Maureen W Groer, Kevin E Kip, Ming Ji.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our aim was to compare the biopsychosocial characteristics of young women with those of older women who were enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation (CR). The baseline characteristics of women who prematurely terminated CR participation were also explored.
METHODS: Baseline physiological and psychosocial indices of women ≤ 55 years compared with older women eligible for CR were evaluated 1 week before enrolling in either a traditional CR or a gender-specific, motivationally enhanced CR.
RESULTS: A greater proportion of young women (n = 65) compared with their older counterparts (n = 187) were diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction during their index hospitalization. They demonstrated lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, higher total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratios, and greater body weight compared with older women and were more likely to be active smokers. Young women compared with older women reported significantly worse health perceptions, quality of life, optimism, hope, social support, and stress and significantly more symptoms of depression and anxiety. Women who prematurely terminated CR participation were younger, more obese, with worse quality of life, and greater symptoms of depression and anxiety compared with women completing CR.
CONCLUSIONS: Notable differences in physiological and psychosocial profiles of young women compared with older women enrolled in CR were evident, placing them at high risk for nonadherence to secondary prevention interventions as well as increased risk for disease progression and subsequent cardiac adverse events. Continued existence of these health differentials represents an important public health problem and warrants further research to address these age-related and sex-specific health disparities among women with coronary heart disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25412222      PMCID: PMC4342322          DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev        ISSN: 1932-7501            Impact factor:   2.081


  76 in total

1.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines).

Authors:  Raymond J Gibbons; Gary J Balady; J Timothy Bricker; Bernard R Chaitman; Gerald F Fletcher; Victor F Froelicher; Daniel B Mark; Ben D McCallister; Aryan N Mooss; Michael G O'Reilly; William L Winters; Raymond J Gibbons; Elliott M Antman; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Loren F Hiratzka; Alice K Jacobs; Richard O Russell; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Abbreviated instrument to measure hope: development and psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  K Herth
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Do younger women fare worse? Sex differences in acute myocardial infarction hospitalization and early mortality rates over ten years.

Authors:  Mona Izadnegahdar; Joel Singer; May K Lee; Min Gao; Christopher R Thompson; Jacek Kopec; Karin H Humphries
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test.

Authors:  M F Scheier; C S Carver; M W Bridges
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1994-12

6.  Generalized equations for predicting body density of women.

Authors:  A S Jackson; M L Pollock; A Ward
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Age and sex differences in inhospital complication rates and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: evidence from the NCDR(®).

Authors:  Judith H Lichtman; Yongfei Wang; Sara B Jones; Erica C Leifheit-Limson; Leslee J Shaw; Viola Vaccarino; John S Rumsfeld; Harlan M Krumholz; Jeptha P Curtis
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  Sex differences in mortality after myocardial infarction: evidence for a sex-age interaction.

Authors:  V Vaccarino; R I Horwitz; T P Meehan; M K Petrillo; M J Radford; H M Krumholz
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-10-12

9.  Testing the performance of the ENRICHD Social Support Instrument in cardiac patients.

Authors:  Joseph Vaglio; Mark Conard; Walker S Poston; James O'Keefe; C Keith Haddock; John House; John A Spertus
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Cardiac rehabilitation patient and organizational factors: what keeps patients in programs?

Authors:  Karam I Turk-Adawi; Neil B Oldridge; Sergey S Tarima; William B Stason; Donald S Shepard
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Preventing and Experiencing Ischemic Heart Disease as a Woman: State of the Science: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Jean C McSweeney; Anne G Rosenfeld; Willie M Abel; Lynne T Braun; Lora E Burke; Stacie L Daugherty; Gerald F Fletcher; Martha Gulati; Laxmi S Mehta; Christina Pettey; Jane F Reckelhoff
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Assessing and Modifying Coronary Artery Disease Risk in Women.

Authors:  Amy Sarma; Nandita S Scott
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-07

3.  Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Hope Among Cardiac Patients After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.

Authors:  Mahnaz Rakhshan; Afsoon Toufigh; Azimeh Dehghani-Firouzabadi; Shahrzad Yektatalab
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-08-25

Review 4.  Behavioral, emotional and neurobiological determinants of coronary heart disease risk in women.

Authors:  Viola Vaccarino; J Douglas Bremner
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Young Women With Coronary Artery Disease Exhibit Higher Concentrations of Interleukin-6 at Baseline and in Response to Mental Stress.

Authors:  Samaah Sullivan; Muhammad Hammadah; Kobina Wilmot; Ronnie Ramadan; Brad D Pearce; Amit Shah; Belal Kaseer; Mohamad Mazen Gafeer; Bruno B Lima; Jeong Hwan Kim; Laura Ward; Yi-An Ko; Tené T Lewis; Allison Hankus; Lisa Elon; Lian Li; J Douglas Bremner; Paolo Raggi; Arshed Quyyumi; Viola Vaccarino
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 5.501

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.