IMPORTANCE: Advance care planning (ACP) prepares patients and their families for future health care decisions; however, the needs of adolescent oncology patients for participation in ACP have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of family-centered ACP. DESIGN AND SETTING: Two-group randomized controlled trial in a pediatric oncology program. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty adolescents aged 14 to 21 years with cancer and their surrogates or families were enrolled in the study between January 17, 2011, and March 29, 2012. INTERVENTION: Thirty dyads received 3- to 60-minute sessions 1 week apart. Intervention dyads completed (1) the Lyon Family-Centered ACP Survey, (2) the Respecting Choices interview, and (3) Five Wishes. Control subjects received standard care plus information. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Statement of treatment preferences and Decisional Conflict Scale score. RESULTS:The mean age of the adolescents was 16 years; 36 (60%) were male, 30 (50%) white, 26 (43%) black, and 4 (7%) Asian. Diagnoses were as follows: leukemia (14 patients [47%]), brain tumor (8 [27%]), solid tumor (6 [20%]), and lymphoma (2 [7%]). Significantly increased congruence was observed for intervention dyads compared with controls for 4 of the 6 disease-specific scenarios; for example, for situation 2 ("treatment would extend my life by not more than 2 to 3 months"), intervention dyads demonstrated higher congruence (κ = 0.660; P < .001) vs control dyads (κ = -0.0636; P = .70). Intervention adolescents (100%) wanted their families to do what is best at the time, whereas fewer control adolescents (62%) gave families this leeway. Intervention adolescents were significantly better informed about end-of-life decisions (t = 2.93; effect size, 0.961; 95% CI, 0.742-1.180; P = .007). Intervention families were more likely to concur on limiting treatments than controls. An ethnic difference was found in only one situation. CONCLUSIONS: Advance care planning enabled families to understand and honor their adolescents' wishes. Intervention dyads were more likely than controls to limit treatments. Underserved African American families were willing to participate.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: Advance care planning (ACP) prepares patients and their families for future health care decisions; however, the needs of adolescent oncology patients for participation in ACP have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of family-centered ACP. DESIGN AND SETTING: Two-group randomized controlled trial in a pediatric oncology program. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty adolescents aged 14 to 21 years with cancer and their surrogates or families were enrolled in the study between January 17, 2011, and March 29, 2012. INTERVENTION: Thirty dyads received 3- to 60-minute sessions 1 week apart. Intervention dyads completed (1) the Lyon Family-Centered ACP Survey, (2) the Respecting Choices interview, and (3) Five Wishes. Control subjects received standard care plus information. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Statement of treatment preferences and Decisional Conflict Scale score. RESULTS: The mean age of the adolescents was 16 years; 36 (60%) were male, 30 (50%) white, 26 (43%) black, and 4 (7%) Asian. Diagnoses were as follows: leukemia (14 patients [47%]), brain tumor (8 [27%]), solid tumor (6 [20%]), and lymphoma (2 [7%]). Significantly increased congruence was observed for intervention dyads compared with controls for 4 of the 6 disease-specific scenarios; for example, for situation 2 ("treatment would extend my life by not more than 2 to 3 months"), intervention dyads demonstrated higher congruence (κ = 0.660; P < .001) vs control dyads (κ = -0.0636; P = .70). Intervention adolescents (100%) wanted their families to do what is best at the time, whereas fewer control adolescents (62%) gave families this leeway. Intervention adolescents were significantly better informed about end-of-life decisions (t = 2.93; effect size, 0.961; 95% CI, 0.742-1.180; P = .007). Intervention families were more likely to concur on limiting treatments than controls. An ethnic difference was found in only one situation. CONCLUSIONS: Advance care planning enabled families to understand and honor their adolescents' wishes. Intervention dyads were more likely than controls to limit treatments. Underserved African American families were willing to participate.
Authors: Meaghann S Weaver; Katherine E Heinze; Katherine P Kelly; Lori Wiener; Robert L Casey; Cynthia J Bell; Joanne Wolfe; Amy M Garee; Anne Watson; Pamela S Hinds Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Giselle K Perez; John M Salsman; Kaitlyn Fladeboe; Anne C Kirchhoff; Elyse R Park; Abby R Rosenberg Journal: Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book Date: 2020-03
Authors: Meaghann S Weaver; Katherine E Heinze; Cynthia J Bell; Lori Wiener; Amy M Garee; Katherine P Kelly; Robert L Casey; Anne Watson; Pamela S Hinds Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Sharyl J Nass; Lynda K Beaupin; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Karen Fasciano; Patricia A Ganz; Brandon Hayes-Lattin; Melissa M Hudson; Brenda Nevidjon; Kevin C Oeffinger; Ruth Rechis; Lisa C Richardson; Nita L Seibel; Ashley W Smith Journal: Oncologist Date: 2015-01-07
Authors: Gabrielle B Rocque; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Chao-Hui Sylvia Huang; Soumya J Niranjan; Courtney P Williams; Bradford E Jackson; Karina I Halilova; Kelly M Kenzik; Kerri S Bevis; Audrey S Wallace; Nedra Lisovicz; Richard A Taylor; Maria Pisu; Edward E Partridge; Thomas W Butler; Linda A Briggs; Elizabeth A Kvale Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Jennifer W Mack; Kun Chen; Francis P Boscoe; Foster C Gesten; Patrick J Roohan; Maria J Schymura; Deborah Schrag Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 2.983