Literature DB >> 23477556

Next-generation sequencing: a powerful tool for the discovery of molecular markers in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Hitchintan Kaur1, Shihong Mao, Seema Shah, David H Gorski, Stephen A Krawetz, Bonnie F Sloane, Raymond R Mattingly.   

Abstract

Mammographic screening leads to frequent biopsies and concomitant overdiagnosis of breast cancer, particularly ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Some DCIS lesions rapidly progress to invasive carcinoma, whereas others remain indolent. Because we cannot yet predict which lesions will not progress, all DCIS is regarded as malignant, and many women are overtreated. Thus, there is a pressing need for a panel of molecular markers in addition to the current clinical and pathological factors to provide prognostic information. Genomic technologies such as microarrays have made major contributions to defining subtypes of breast cancer. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) modalities offer unprecedented depth of expression analysis through revealing transcriptional boundaries, mutations, rare transcripts and alternative splice variants. NGS approaches are just beginning to be applied to DCIS. Here, the authors review the applications and challenges of NGS in discovering novel potential therapeutic targets and candidate biomarkers in the premalignant progression of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23477556      PMCID: PMC3804339          DOI: 10.1586/erm.13.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1473-7159            Impact factor:   5.225


  151 in total

1.  Improving validation practices in "omics" research.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A global view of gene activity and alternative splicing by deep sequencing of the human transcriptome.

Authors:  Marc Sultan; Marcel H Schulz; Hugues Richard; Alon Magen; Andreas Klingenhoff; Matthias Scherf; Martin Seifert; Tatjana Borodina; Aleksey Soldatov; Dmitri Parkhomchuk; Dominic Schmidt; Sean O'Keeffe; Stefan Haas; Martin Vingron; Hans Lehrach; Marie-Laure Yaspo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Biomarker expression and risk of subsequent tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Annette M Molinaro; Mona L Gauthier; Hal K Berman; Fred Waldman; James Bennington; Henry Sanchez; Cynthia Jimenez; Kim Stewart; Karen Chew; Britt-Marie Ljung; Thea D Tlsty
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Molecular mechanisms of breast cancer progression: lessons from mouse mammary cancer models and gene expression profiling.

Authors:  Yumei Ye; Ting Hu Qiu; Claudine Kavanaugh; Jeffrey E Green
Journal:  Breast Dis       Date:  2004

5.  Human primary ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) subtype-specific pathology is preserved in a mouse intraductal (MIND) xenograft model.

Authors:  Kelli Elizabeth Valdez; Fang Fan; William Smith; D Craig Allred; Daniel Medina; Fariba Behbod
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Stephanie Jarosek; Elizabeth B Habermann; Amanda Arrington; Anasooya Abraham; Todd J Morris; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics.

Authors:  Zhong Wang; Mark Gerstein; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Association of C-MYC amplification with progression from the in situ to the invasive stage in C-MYC-amplified breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Els C Robanus-Maandag; Cathy A J Bosch; Petra M Kristel; Augustinus A M Hart; Ian F Faneyte; Petra M Nederlof; Johannes L Peterse; Marc J van de Vijver
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.996

9.  A Comparative Analysis of Biomarker Expression and Molecular Subtypes of Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Breast Carcinoma by Image Analysis: Relationship of the Subtypes with Histologic Grade, Ki67, p53 Overexpression, and DNA Ploidy.

Authors:  Venetia R Sarode; Jeong S Han; Danielle H Morris; Yan Peng; Roshni Rao
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-08-17

10.  Design and analysis of ChIP-seq experiments for DNA-binding proteins.

Authors:  Peter V Kharchenko; Michael Y Tolstorukov; Peter J Park
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  How to Target Activated Ras Proteins: Direct Inhibition vs. Induced Mislocalization.

Authors:  Ethan J Brock; Kyungmin Ji; John J Reiners; Raymond R Mattingly
Journal:  Mini Rev Med Chem       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.862

Review 2.  Ras and Rap1: A tale of two GTPases.

Authors:  Seema Shah; Ethan J Brock; Kyungmin Ji; Raymond R Mattingly
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 3.  In Vitro Models for Studying Invasive Transitions of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Ethan J Brock; Kyungmin Ji; Seema Shah; Raymond R Mattingly; Bonnie F Sloane
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 2.673

4.  Detection of gene copy number alterations in DCIS and invasive breast cancer by QM-FISH.

Authors:  Aifeng Pan; Yawei Zhou; Kun Mu; Yansong Liu; Feifei Sun; Peng Li; Li Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: immune cell composition according to subtype.

Authors:  Marie Colombe Agahozo; Mieke R van Bockstal; Floris H Groenendijk; Thierry P P van den Bosch; Pieter J Westenend; Carolien H M van Deurzen
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 6.  Exome sequencing: new insights into lipoprotein disorders.

Authors:  Sali M K Farhan; Robert A Hegele
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in basic and translational breast cancer research.

Authors:  Lacey E Dobrolecki; Susie D Airhart; Denis G Alferez; Samuel Aparicio; Fariba Behbod; Mohamed Bentires-Alj; Cathrin Brisken; Carol J Bult; Shirong Cai; Robert B Clarke; Heidi Dowst; Matthew J Ellis; Eva Gonzalez-Suarez; Richard D Iggo; Peter Kabos; Shunqiang Li; Geoffrey J Lindeman; Elisabetta Marangoni; Aaron McCoy; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Helen Piwnica-Worms; Marie-France Poupon; Jorge Reis-Filho; Carol A Sartorius; Valentina Scabia; George Sflomos; Yizheng Tu; François Vaillant; Jane E Visvader; Alana Welm; Max S Wicha; Michael T Lewis
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 9.264

8.  MicroRNA expression profiling of lactating mammary gland in divergent phenotype swine breeds.

Authors:  Jing Peng; Jun-Sheng Zhao; Yi-Fei Shen; Hai-Guang Mao; Ning-Ying Xu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Molecular biomarkers screened by next-generation RNA sequencing for non-sentinel lymph node status prediction in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Feng Liang; Hongzhu Qu; Qiang Lin; Yadong Yang; Xiuyan Ruan; Bo Zhang; Yi Liu; Chengze Yu; Hongyan Zhang; Xiangdong Fang; Xiaopeng Hao
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Whole genome and transcriptome sequencing of matched primary and peritoneal metastatic gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  J Zhang; J Y Huang; Y N Chen; F Yuan; H Zhang; F H Yan; M J Wang; G Wang; M Su; G Lu; Y Huang; H Dai; J Ji; J Zhang; J N Zhang; Y N Jiang; S J Chen; Z G Zhu; Y Y Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.