Literature DB >> 28025748

Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in basic and translational breast cancer research.

Lacey E Dobrolecki1, Susie D Airhart2, Denis G Alferez3, Samuel Aparicio4, Fariba Behbod5, Mohamed Bentires-Alj6, Cathrin Brisken7, Carol J Bult2, Shirong Cai8, Robert B Clarke3, Heidi Dowst9, Matthew J Ellis1, Eva Gonzalez-Suarez10, Richard D Iggo11, Peter Kabos12, Shunqiang Li13, Geoffrey J Lindeman14,15,16, Elisabetta Marangoni17, Aaron McCoy8, Funda Meric-Bernstam18, Helen Piwnica-Worms8, Marie-France Poupon19, Jorge Reis-Filho20, Carol A Sartorius21, Valentina Scabia7, George Sflomos7, Yizheng Tu8, François Vaillant14,22, Jane E Visvader14,22, Alana Welm23, Max S Wicha24, Michael T Lewis25.   

Abstract

Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of a growing spectrum of cancers are rapidly supplanting long-established traditional cell lines as preferred models for conducting basic and translational preclinical research. In breast cancer, to complement the now curated collection of approximately 45 long-established human breast cancer cell lines, a newly formed consortium of academic laboratories, currently from Europe, Australia, and North America, herein summarizes data on over 500 stably transplantable PDX models representing all three clinical subtypes of breast cancer (ER+, HER2+, and "Triple-negative" (TNBC)). Many of these models are well-characterized with respect to genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic features, metastatic behavior, and treatment response to a variety of standard-of-care and experimental therapeutics. These stably transplantable PDX lines are generally available for dissemination to laboratories conducting translational research, and contact information for each collection is provided. This review summarizes current experiences related to PDX generation across participating groups, efforts to develop data standards for annotation and dissemination of patient clinical information that does not compromise patient privacy, efforts to develop complementary data standards for annotation of PDX characteristics and biology, and progress toward "credentialing" of PDX models as surrogates to represent individual patients for use in preclinical and co-clinical translational research. In addition, this review highlights important unresolved questions, as well as current limitations, that have hampered more efficient generation of PDX lines and more rapid adoption of PDX use in translational breast cancer research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Immunocompromised/immunodeficient mice; PDX consortium; Patient-derived xenograft; Translational research

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28025748      PMCID: PMC5396460          DOI: 10.1007/s10555-016-9653-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev        ISSN: 0167-7659            Impact factor:   9.264


  210 in total

1.  Kinetic evidence of the regeneration of multilineage hematopoiesis from primitive cells in normal human bone marrow transplanted into immunodeficient mice.

Authors:  J D Cashman; T Lapidot; J C Wang; M Doedens; L D Shultz; P Lansdorp; J E Dick; C J Eaves
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Validity of mouse mammary tumour models for human breast cancer: comparative pathology.

Authors:  R D Cardiff
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 2.769

3.  Prognostic and functional importance of the engraftment-associated genes in the patient-derived xenograft models of triple-negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Hyeong-Gon Moon; Keunhee Oh; Jiwoo Lee; Minju Lee; Ju-Yeon Kim; Tae-Kyung Yoo; Myung Won Seo; Ae Kyung Park; Han Suk Ryu; Eun-Jung Jung; Namshin Kim; Seongmun Jeong; Wonshik Han; Dong-Sup Lee; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Growth and metastasis of surgical specimens of human breast carcinomas in SCID mice.

Authors:  T Sakakibara; Y Xu; H L Bumpers; F A Chen; R B Bankert; M A Arredondo; S B Edge; E A Repasky
Journal:  Cancer J Sci Am       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct

5.  Reconstruction of human mammary tissues in a mouse model.

Authors:  David A Proia; Charlotte Kuperwasser
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 6.  Overcoming current limitations in humanized mouse research.

Authors:  Michael A Brehm; Leonard D Shultz; Jeremy Luban; Dale L Greiner
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Dynamics of genomic clones in breast cancer patient xenografts at single-cell resolution.

Authors:  Peter Eirew; Adi Steif; Jaswinder Khattra; Gavin Ha; Damian Yap; Hossein Farahani; Karen Gelmon; Stephen Chia; Colin Mar; Adrian Wan; Emma Laks; Justina Biele; Karey Shumansky; Jamie Rosner; Andrew McPherson; Cydney Nielsen; Andrew J L Roth; Calvin Lefebvre; Ali Bashashati; Camila de Souza; Celia Siu; Radhouane Aniba; Jazmine Brimhall; Arusha Oloumi; Tomo Osako; Alejandra Bruna; Jose L Sandoval; Teresa Algara; Wendy Greenwood; Kaston Leung; Hongwei Cheng; Hui Xue; Yuzhuo Wang; Dong Lin; Andrew J Mungall; Richard Moore; Yongjun Zhao; Julie Lorette; Long Nguyen; David Huntsman; Connie J Eaves; Carl Hansen; Marco A Marra; Carlos Caldas; Sohrab P Shah; Samuel Aparicio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in the mouse. Pathology, reconstitution, neoplasms.

Authors:  R P Custer; G C Bosma; M J Bosma
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.307

9.  Breast tumor PDXs are genetically plastic and correspond to a subset of aggressive cancers prone to relapse.

Authors:  Stanislas du Manoir; Béatrice Orsetti; Rui Bras-Gonçalves; Tien-Tuan Nguyen; Laurence Lasorsa; Florence Boissière; Blandine Massemin; Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo; Frédéric Bibeau; William Jacot; Charles Theillet
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 10.  Requirement of macrophages and eosinophils and their cytokines/chemokines for mammary gland development.

Authors:  Valérie Gouon-Evans; Elaine Y Lin; Jeffrey W Pollard
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  92 in total

1.  Role of docosahexaenoic acid in enhancement of docetaxel action in patient-derived breast cancer xenografts.

Authors:  Marnie Newell; Susan Goruk; Vera Mazurak; Lynne Postovit; Catherine J Field
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Model organism data evolving in support of translational medicine.

Authors:  Douglas G Howe; Judith A Blake; Yvonne M Bradford; Carol J Bult; Brian R Calvi; Stacia R Engel; James A Kadin; Thomas C Kaufman; Ranjana Kishore; Stanley J F Laulederkind; Suzanna E Lewis; Sierra A T Moxon; Joel E Richardson; Cynthia Smith
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 12.625

3.  Cancer Explant Models.

Authors:  Christian T Stackhouse; George Yancey Gillespie; Christopher D Willey
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

4.  Intraductal Injection of Lentivirus Vectors for Stably Introducing Genes into Rat Mammary Epithelial Cells in Vivo.

Authors:  Wen Bu; Yi Li
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.673

5.  Cytoplasmic ERα and NFκB Promote Cell Survival in Mouse Mammary Cancer Cell Lines.

Authors:  Emily Smart; Luis H Alejo; Jonna Frasor
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.869

6.  Progesterone and Breast Cancer: an NCI Workshop Report.

Authors:  Neeraja Sathyamoorthy; Carol A Lange
Journal:  Horm Cancer       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.869

7.  Mammary Organoids and 3D Cell Cultures: Old Dogs with New Tricks.

Authors:  Jakub Sumbal; Zuzana Budkova; Gunnhildur Ásta Traustadóttir; Zuzana Koledova
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.673

8.  Orthotopic Implantation Achieves Better Engraftment and Faster Growth Than Subcutaneous Implantation in Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts.

Authors:  Maiko Okano; Masanori Oshi; Ali Butash; Ichiro Okano; Katsuharu Saito; Tsutomu Kawaguchi; Masayuki Nagahashi; Koji Kono; Toru Ohtake; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.673

9.  Tumor-initiating CD49f cells are a hallmark of chemoresistant triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Jorge Gomez-Miragaya; Eva González-Suárez
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2017-06-28

10.  A multi-site metastasis-on-a-chip microphysiological system for assessing metastatic preference of cancer cells.

Authors:  Julio Aleman; Aleksander Skardal
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.