Rita Schmidt1, Lucio Frydman. 1. Department of Chemical Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Single-scan multislice acquisition schemes play key roles in magnetic resonance imaging. Central among these "ultrafast" experiments stands echo-planar imaging, a technique that although of optimal sampling is challenged by T2* artifacts. Recent studies described alternatives based on spatiotemporal encoding (SPEN), which are particularly robust if implemented in a "full-refocusing" mode. This work extends this modality from the single-slice acquisitions in which it has hitherto been implemented, by introducing a variety of multislice schemes scanning 3D volumes. METHODS: Multislice SPEN employing either inversion or stimulated echo pulses and timed to fulfill the demands of full refocusing, are demonstrated. The performance of the ensuing methods was examined in "Hybrid" modalities encoding data in k- and direct-space, in low-specific absorption rate stimulated-echo approaches, and in direct-space SPEN approaches. RESULTS: When applied in phantoms and in in vivo systems, the ensuing single-shot sequences evidenced similar robustness, sensitivity, and resolution qualities as previously discussed 2D single-slice schemes, while enabling a rapid sampling of the third dimension via multislicing. CONCLUSION: The unique benefits deriving from fully refocused, multislice, single-scan SPEN sequences were corroborated by phantom tests, as well as by in vivo scans at 3 and 7 T. Low specific absorption rate multislice SPEN variants compatible with human studies were demonstrated.
PURPOSE: Single-scan multislice acquisition schemes play key roles in magnetic resonance imaging. Central among these "ultrafast" experiments stands echo-planar imaging, a technique that although of optimal sampling is challenged by T2* artifacts. Recent studies described alternatives based on spatiotemporal encoding (SPEN), which are particularly robust if implemented in a "full-refocusing" mode. This work extends this modality from the single-slice acquisitions in which it has hitherto been implemented, by introducing a variety of multislice schemes scanning 3D volumes. METHODS: Multislice SPEN employing either inversion or stimulated echo pulses and timed to fulfill the demands of full refocusing, are demonstrated. The performance of the ensuing methods was examined in "Hybrid" modalities encoding data in k- and direct-space, in low-specific absorption rate stimulated-echo approaches, and in direct-space SPEN approaches. RESULTS: When applied in phantoms and in in vivo systems, the ensuing single-shot sequences evidenced similar robustness, sensitivity, and resolution qualities as previously discussed 2D single-slice schemes, while enabling a rapid sampling of the third dimension via multislicing. CONCLUSION: The unique benefits deriving from fully refocused, multislice, single-scan SPEN sequences were corroborated by phantom tests, as well as by in vivo scans at 3 and 7 T. Low specific absorption rate multislice SPEN variants compatible with human studies were demonstrated.
Authors: Ryan Chamberlain; Jang-Yeon Park; Curt Corum; Essa Yacoub; Kamil Ugurbil; Clifford R Jack; Michael Garwood Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jason Graham Skinner; Luca Menichetti; Alessandra Flori; Anna Dost; Andreas Benjamin Schmidt; Markus Plaumann; Ferdia Aiden Gallagher; Jan-Bernd Hövener Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Jason P Stockmann; Clarissa Z Cooley; Bastien Guerin; Matthew S Rosen; Lawrence L Wald Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Avigdor Leftin; Jens T Rosenberg; Xuegang Yuan; Teng Ma; Samuel C Grant; Lucio Frydman Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2019-12-03 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Rita Schmidt; Christoffer Laustsen; Jean-Nicolas Dumez; Mikko I Kettunen; Eva M Serrao; Irene Marco-Rius; Kevin M Brindle; Jan Henrik Ardenkjaer-Larsen; Lucio Frydman Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2014-01-12 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Maxime Yon; João P de Almeida Martins; Qingjia Bao; Matthew D Budde; Lucio Frydman; Daniel Topgaard Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-08-19 Impact factor: 4.044