Literature DB >> 23458745

A diffusion-compensated model for the analysis of DCE-MRI data: theory, simulations and experimental results.

Jacob U Fluckiger1, Mary E Loveless, Stephanie L Barnes, Martin Lepage, Thomas E Yankeelov.   

Abstract

Accurate quantification of pharmacokinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI may be affected by the passive diffusion of contrast agent (CA) within the tissue. By introducing an additional term into the standard Tofts-Kety (STK) model, we correct for the effects of CA diffusion. We first develop the theory describing a CA diffusion corrected STK model (DTK). The model is then tested in simulation with simple models of diffusion. The DTK model is also fit to 18 in vivo DCE-MRI acquisitions from murine models of cancer and results are compared to those from the STK model. The DTK model returned estimates with significantly lower error than the STK model (p ≪ 0.001). In poorly perfused (i.e., K(trans) ≤ 0.05 min(-1)) regions the STK model returned unphysical ve values, while the DTK model estimated ve with less than 7% error in noise-free simulations. Results in vivo data revealed similar trends. For voxels with low K(trans) values and late peak concentration times the STK model returned ve estimates >1.0 in 40% of the voxels as compared to only 16% for the DTK model. The DTK model presented here shows promise in estimating accurate kinetic parameters in the presence of passive contrast agent diffusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23458745      PMCID: PMC3646091          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/6/1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  30 in total

1.  Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts.

Authors:  P S Tofts; A G Kermode
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  The theory and applications of the exchange of inert gas at the lungs and tissues.

Authors:  S S KETY
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1951-03       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 3.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Role of extracellular matrix assembly in interstitial transport in solid tumors.

Authors:  P A Netti; D A Berk; M A Swartz; A J Grodzinsky; R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of tumor necrosis.

Authors:  Tormod A M Egeland; Jon-Vidar Gaustad; Kanthi Galappathi; Einar K Rofstad
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 4.089

6.  Correlation of dynamic contrast enhancement MRI parameters with microvessel density and VEGF for assessment of angiogenesis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Min-Ying Su; Yun-Chung Cheung; John P Fruehauf; Hon Yu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Eugene Mechetner; Ainura Kyshtoobayeva; Shin-Cheh Chen; Swei Hsueh; Christine E McLaren; Yung-Liang Wan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Incorporating contrast agent diffusion into the analysis of DCE-MRI data.

Authors:  Martin Pellerin; Thomas E Yankeelov; Martin Lepage
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Colorectal liver metastases: contrast agent diffusion coefficient for quantification of contrast enhancement heterogeneity at MR imaging.

Authors:  Guang Jia; Craig O'Dell; Johannes T Heverhagen; Xiangyu Yang; Jiachao Liang; Richard V Jacko; Steffen Sammet; Theodore Pellas; Patricia Cole; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Noninvasive multimodality imaging of the tumor microenvironment: registered dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography studies of a preclinical tumor model of tumor hypoxia.

Authors:  HyungJoon Cho; Ellen Ackerstaff; Sean Carlin; Mihaela E Lupu; Ya Wang; Asif Rizwan; Joseph O'Donoghue; C Clifton Ling; John L Humm; Pat B Zanzonico; Jason A Koutcher
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 10.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  11 in total

1.  A Metric for Reducing False Positives in the Computer-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Screening Examinations of High-Risk Women.

Authors:  Jacob E D Levman; Cristina Gallego-Ortiz; Ellen Warner; Petrina Causer; Anne L Martel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Diffusion-compensated tofts model suggests contrast leakage through aneurysm wall.

Authors:  Charles G Cantrell; Parmede Vakil; Yong Jeong; Sameer A Ansari; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Techniques and applications of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in cancer.

Authors:  Stephanie L Barnes; Jennifer G Whisenant; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

4.  GdDO3NI, a nitroimidazole-based T1 MRI contrast agent for imaging tumor hypoxia in vivo.

Authors:  Praveen K Gulaka; Federico Rojas-Quijano; Zoltan Kovacs; Ralph P Mason; A Dean Sherry; Vikram D Kodibagkar
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.358

5.  The effects of intravoxel contrast agent diffusion on the analysis of DCE-MRI data in realistic tissue domains.

Authors:  Ryan T Woodall; Stephanie L Barnes; David A Hormuth; Anna G Sorace; C Chad Quarles; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Correlation of tumor characteristics derived from DCE-MRI and DW-MRI with histology in murine models of breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephanie L Barnes; Anna G Sorace; Mary E Loveless; Jennifer G Whisenant; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Pseudo Test-Retest Evaluation of Millimeter-Resolution Whole-Brain Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Patients with High-Grade Glioma.

Authors:  Yannick Bliesener; R Marc Lebel; Jay Acharya; Richard Frayne; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 29.146

8.  Evaluating treatment response using DW-MRI and DCE-MRI in trastuzumab responsive and resistant HER2-overexpressing human breast cancer xenografts.

Authors:  Jennifer G Whisenant; Anna G Sorace; J Oliver McIntyre; Hakmook Kang; Violeta Sánchez; Mary E Loveless; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Modeling the effect of intra-voxel diffusion of contrast agent on the quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Stephanie L Barnes; C Chad Quarles; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mitotic Activity in Glioblastoma Correlates with Estimated Extravascular Extracellular Space Derived from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging.

Authors:  S J Mills; D du Plessis; P Pal; G Thompson; G Buonacorrsi; C Soh; G J M Parker; A Jackson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.