Literature DB >> 26293705

A Metric for Reducing False Positives in the Computer-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer from Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Screening Examinations of High-Risk Women.

Jacob E D Levman1, Cristina Gallego-Ortiz2, Ellen Warner3, Petrina Causer4, Anne L Martel5.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-enabled cancer screening has been shown to be a highly sensitive method for the early detection of breast cancer. Computer-aided detection systems have the potential to improve the screening process by standardizing radiologists to a high level of diagnostic accuracy. This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. This study compares the performance of a proposed method for computer-aided detection (based on the second-order spatial derivative of the relative signal intensity) with the signal enhancement ratio (SER) on MRI-based breast screening examinations. Comparison is performed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis as well as free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) curve analysis. A modified computer-aided detection system combining the proposed approach with the SER method is also presented. The proposed method provides improvements in the rates of false positive markings over the SER method in the detection of breast cancer (as assessed by FROC analysis). The modified computer-aided detection system that incorporates both the proposed method and the SER method yields ROC results equal to that produced by SER while simultaneously providing improvements over the SER method in terms of false positives per noncancerous exam. The proposed method for identifying malignancies outperforms the SER method in terms of false positives on a challenging dataset containing many small lesions and may play a useful role in breast cancer screening by MRI as part of a computer-aided detection system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Computer-aided detection; Free response receiver operating characteristic curve analysis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26293705      PMCID: PMC4722034          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-015-9796-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  28 in total

Review 1.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a primer.

Authors:  John Eng
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study.

Authors:  Erika Rubesova; Anne-Sophie Grell; Viviane De Maertelaer; Thierry Metens; Shih-Li Chao; Marc Lemort
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  A test of performance of breast MRI interpretation in a multicentre screening study.

Authors:  Ruth Warren; Carmel Hayes; Linda Pointon; Rebecca Hoff; Fiona J Gilbert; Anwar R Padhani; Caroline Rubin; Glenda Kaplan; Kauza Raza; Laura Wilkinson; Margaret Hall-Craggs; Preminda Kessar; Sheila Rankin; Adrian K Dixon; James Walsh; Lindsay Turnbull; Peter Britton; Ruchi Sinnatamby; Doug Easton; Deborah Thompson; Sunil R Lakhani; Martin O Leach
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Carla Boetes; Wylie Burke; Steven Harms; Martin O Leach; Constance D Lehman; Elizabeth Morris; Etta Pisano; Mitchell Schnall; Stephen Sener; Robert A Smith; Ellen Warner; Martin Yaffe; Kimberly S Andrews; Christy A Russell
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty; L H Winter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Bilateral imaging using separate interleaved 3D volumes and dynamically switched multiple receive coil arrays.

Authors:  R L Greenman; R E Lenkinski; M D Schnall
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Measurement of Gd-DTPA diffusion through PVA hydrogel using a novel magnetic resonance imaging method.

Authors:  M J Gordon; K C Chu; A Margaritis; A J Martin; C R Ethier; B K Rutt
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1999-11-20       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension.

Authors:  Reiko Woodhams; Keiji Matsunaga; Keiichi Iwabuchi; Shinichi Kan; Hirofumi Hata; Masaru Kuranami; Masahiko Watanabe; Kazushige Hayakawa
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of disparities in the transcapillary transfer rates in orthotopically inoculated invasive breast tumors.

Authors:  Maya Dadiani; Raanan Margalit; Noa Sela; Hadassa Degani
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  1 in total

1.  Automated Detection and Segmentation of Nonmass-Enhancing Breast Tumors with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Anke Meyer-Baese; Ignacio Alvarez Illan; Javier Ramirez; J M Gorriz; Maria Adele Marino; Daly Avendano; Thomas Helbich; Pascal Baltzer
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.161

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.