Literature DB >> 23456086

Complications with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and recent evolutions.

Marius M Scarlat1.   

Abstract

Since its description by Paul Grammont from Dijon, France, several tens of thousands of reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (RTSA) have been performed for diverse conditions. The purpose of this analysis is to identify the complications of this procedure in the literature and in clinical practice. A total of 240 papers concerning RTSA published between 1996 and 2012 have been identified. Over 80 papers describe complications associated with this type of implant. A list of prostheses satisfying European and US standards, CE and FDA approved, has been produced on the basis of information provided by the manufacturers. Data from the literature do not support a meta-analysis. The inventory of best practices shows excellent results in the short and medium term in specific indications, while the number of complications varies between 10 and 65 % in long-term series. Complications can be classified into (A) non-specific including infections (superficial and deep), phlebitis, haematoma, neurological complications of the suprascapular, radial and axillary nerves and (B) specific complications associated with RTSA including (1) on the glenoid side: intraoperative fracture of the glenoid and acromion, late fracture of the scapula, impingement at the scapular neck (notching), glenoid loosening, dissociation of the glenoid component (snatching of the glenosphere) and fractures of the glenoid baseplate; (2) on the humeral side: metaphyseal deterioration, humeral loosening, instability of the shoulder, stiffness with limitation of external and/or internal rotation; and (3) muscular complications with fatty degeneration of the deltoid. Additionally we have identified specific situations related to the type of implant such as the disassembly of the humeral or the glenoid component, dissociation of the polyethylene humeral plate, dissociation of the metaphysis and osteolysis of the tuberosities. The integration of results from different clinical series is difficult because of the lack of a database and the multitude of implants used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23456086      PMCID: PMC3631489          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1832-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  49 in total

1.  [Grammont prosthesis in humeral head osteonecrosis. Indications--results].

Authors:  E Baulot; E Garron; P M Grammont
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 0.500

2.  Grammont's reverse shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff arthropathy. A retrospective study of 32 cases.

Authors:  Benoit Vanhove; Alain Beugnies
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.500

3.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years.

Authors:  Jacques Guery; Luc Favard; François Sirveaux; Didier Oudet; Daniel Mole; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Humeral prosthetic failure of reversed total shoulder arthroplasty: a report of three cases.

Authors:  Lieven De Wilde; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Outcomes analysis of revision total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Joshua S Dines; Stephen Fealy; Eric J Strauss; Answorth Allen; Edward V Craig; Russell F Warren; David M Dines
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The impact of scapular notching on reverse shoulder glenoid fixation.

Authors:  Christopher P Roche; Nicholas J Stroud; Brian L Martin; Cindy A Steiler; Pierre-Henri Flurin; Thomas W Wright; Matthew J DiPaola; Joseph D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.019

7.  The Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis for glenohumeral arthritis associated with severe rotator cuff deficiency. A minimum two-year follow-up study of sixty patients.

Authors:  Mark Frankle; Steven Siegal; Derek Pupello; Arif Saleem; Mark Mighell; Matthew Vasey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of defect arthropathy.

Authors:  Ludwig Seebauer; Willibald Walter; Werner Keyl
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 9.  Management of irreparable rotator cuff tears and glenohumeral arthritis.

Authors:  Laurence Laudicina; Robert D'Ambrosia
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.390

10.  Grammont reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and nonreconstructible rotator cuff lesions.

Authors:  M Rittmeister; F Kerschbaumer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  45 in total

1.  Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a mini 25-mm glenoid baseplate.

Authors:  George S Athwal; Kenneth J Faber
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Glenosphere disengagement in a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with a non-Morse taper design.

Authors:  Corey B Fuller; Stephen F Gregorius; Eric K Lim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty revision with glenoid reconstruction and bone grafting.

Authors:  Thomas Hoffelner; Philipp Moroder; Alexander Auffarth; Mark Tauber; Herbert Resch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Arm lengthening after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Tom Bradley Edwards; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Impact and alternative metrics for medical publishing: our experience with International Orthopaedics.

Authors:  Marius M Scarlat; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Marko Pećina; Marius Niculescu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Clinical and radiological outcome of the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS®) reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective comparative non-randomised study.

Authors:  Bakir Kadum; Sebastian Mukka; Erling Englund; Arkan Sayed-Noor; Göran Sjödén
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The effect of deltoid lengthening on functional outcome for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  V J Sabesan; D Lombardo; D Josserand; D Buzas; T Jelsema; G R Petersen-Fitts; J M Wiater
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-03-30

Review 8.  Meta-analysis suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humerus fractures is a better option than hemiarthroplasty in the elderly.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Yanbin Zhu; Fei Zhang; Wei Chen; Ye Tian; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Neuropathic Pain after Shoulder Arthroplasty: Prevalence, Impact on Physical and Mental Function, and Demographic Determinants.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Linda J Woodhouse; Richard Holtby
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.037

10.  Conversion of shoulder arthroplasty to reverse implants: clinical and radiological results using a modular system.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Marco Delcogliano; Francesca de Caro; Giovanni Ziveri; Mario Borroni; Stefano Gumina; Franco Postacchini; Carlo Felice De Biase
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.