Literature DB >> 15287400

Grammont's reverse shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff arthropathy. A retrospective study of 32 cases.

Benoit Vanhove1, Alain Beugnies.   

Abstract

The authors have retrospectively studied a series of 32 reverse shoulder prostheses implanted in 30 patients by the same surgeon between 1992 and 2000. The mean age was 71 years; 26 patients were female, 4 were male. Thirteen patients (14 prostheses) were clinically and radiologically examined at follow-up; 9 patients (10 prostheses) were questioned by telephone and their radiological records were studied. With a mean follow-up of 31 months, 92 % (22/24) were entirely satisfied with the operation. The mean Constant score for the 14 shoulders which were clinically evaluated at follow-up was 60/100. There was one failure, related with glenoid loosening. These findings are in line with the good short-term results previously reported with this prosthesis. Glenoid notching is a well-known problem with the reversed prosthesis; it may lead to implant failure. We noted such an image in 50 % of our patients. In several cases however, the radiological finding was more suggestive of osteophytic formation than of real bony erosion, an observation that has not been reported before. The image remained stable over time and did not lead to glenoid loosening within the time limits of the study. Nevertheless, notching remains a concern with respect to the long-term survival of these implants which should therefore, in our opinion, be used only in elderly patients. Whether improved technique or design modification can address this issue still has to be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15287400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  36 in total

Review 1.  Scapular notching: Recognition and strategies to minimize clinical impact.

Authors:  Gregory P Nicholson; Eric J Strauss; Seth L Sherman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-from the most to the least common complication.

Authors:  Mazda Farshad; Christian Gerber
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Long-term impact of scapular notching after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  C Spiry; J Berhouet; C Agout; G Bacle; Luc Favard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty: minimizing scapular impingement while maximizing glenoid fixation.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Grégory Moineau; Yannick Roussanne; Kieran O'Shea
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Glenosphere disengagement: a potentially serious default in reverse shoulder surgery.

Authors:  Bart Middernacht; Lieven De Wilde; Daniel Molé; Luc Favard; Philippe Debeer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Consequences of scapular anatomy for reversed total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bart Middernacht; Pieter-Jan De Roo; Georges Van Maele; Lieven F De Wilde
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Medium term results of reverse total shoulder replacement in patients with rotator cuff arthropathy.

Authors:  M K Sayana; G Kakarala; S Bandi; C Wynn-Jones
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Reverse total shoulder replacement: intraoperative and early postoperative complications.

Authors:  Carl Wierks; Richard L Skolasky; Jong Hun Ji; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Characteristic heterotopic ossification of the proximal humerus after total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Erik Olsen; Donald Endrizzi; Matthew Stephenson; Steven Farraher
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Complications with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and recent evolutions.

Authors:  Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.