Literature DB >> 23450133

Complete genome sequence of Terriglobus saanensis type strain SP1PR4(T), an Acidobacteria from tundra soil.

Suman R Rawat1, Minna K Männistö, Valentin Starovoytov, Lynne Goodwin, Matt Nolan, Lauren Hauser, Miriam Land, Karen Walston Davenport, Tanja Woyke, Max M Häggblom.   

Abstract

Terriglobus saanensis SP1PR4(T) is a novel species of the genus Terriglobus. T. saanensis is of ecological interest because it is a representative of the phylum Acidobacteria, which are dominant members of bacterial soil microbiota in Arctic ecosystems. T. saanensis is a cold-adapted acidophile and a versatile heterotroph utilizing a suite of simple sugars and complex polysaccharides. The genome contained an abundance of genes assigned to metabolism and transport of carbohydrates including gene modules encoding for carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme) family involved in breakdown, utilization and biosynthesis of diverse structural and storage polysaccharides. T. saanensis SP1PR4(T) represents the first member of genus Terriglobus with a completed genome sequence, consisting of a single replicon of 5,095,226 base pairs (bp), 54 RNA genes and 4,279 protein-coding genes. We infer that the physiology and metabolic potential of T. saanensis is adapted to allow for resilience to the nutrient-deficient conditions and fluctuating temperatures of Arctic tundra soils.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acidobacteria; acidophile; cold adapted; tundra soil

Year:  2012        PMID: 23450133      PMCID: PMC3570800          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.3036810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain SP1PR4T (= DSM 23119 = ATCC BAA-1853) is the type strain of . It is second of two validly ascribed species of the genus with first isolated from agricultural soils in 2007 [1]. SP1PR4T was isolated from Arctic tundra soil collected from a wind exposed site of Saana fjeld, north-western Finland (69°01’N, 20°50’E) [2,3]. The species name saanensis (sa.a.nen' sis. N.L. masc. adj. saanensis) pertains to Mount Saana in Finland. are found in diverse soil environments and are widely distributed in Arctic and boreal soils [4-8]. However, relatively little is still known about their metabolic potential and ecological roles in these habitats. Despite a large collection of 16S rRNA gene sequences in databases that represent diverse phylotypes from various habitats, few have been cultivated and described. represent 26 phylogenetic subdivisions based on 16S rRNA gene phylogeny [9] of which subdivisions 1, 3, 4 and 6 are most commonly detected in soil environments [10]. The abundance of has been found to correlate with soil pH [2,10,11] and carbon [1,12,13] with subdivision 1 being most abundant in slightly acidic soils. The phylogenetic diversity, ubiquity and abundance of this group suggest that they play important ecological roles in soils. Our previous studies on bacterial community profiling from Arctic alpine tundra soils of northern Finland have shown that dominate in the acidic tundra heaths [2] and after multiple freeze-thaw cycles [6]. Using selective isolation techniques, including freezing soils at -20°C for 7 days, we have been able to isolate several slow growing and fastidious strains of . On the basis of phylogenetic, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic data, including 16S rRNA, rpoB gene sequence similarity and DNA–DNA hybridization, strain SP1PR4T was classified as a novel species of the genus [3]. Here, we summarize the physiological features together with the complete genome sequence and annotation of SP1PR4T.

Classification and features

Within the genus , two species are ascribed with validly published names, SP1PR4T [3] isolated from Arctic tundra soils and KBS 63T (DSM 18391) isolated from agricultural soils (KBS-LTER site) [1]. Searching the NCBI non-redundant nucleotide database for homology to 16S rRNA gene sequence of SP1PR4T identified 10 cultured and 20 uncultured strains that were unclassified, with ≥97% 16S rRNA sequence identity. Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene depicting the position of SP1PR4T relative to the other type strains within the family is shown in Figure 1. SP1PR4T is distinctly clustered into a separate branch with KBS 63T (DQ660892) [1], as its closest described relative (97.1% 16S rRNA sequence identity). Strain SP1PR4T showed ~95% 16S rRNA gene identity to four strains in the genus isolated from tundra soils, namely “ (95.9%), “95.8%), “ (95.5%) and “” (94.9%) [3,15] (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of SP1PR4T relative to the other type strains within the family . The maximum likelihood tree was inferred from 1,359 aligned positions of the 16S rRNA gene sequences and derived using MEGA version 5 [14]. Bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 1,000 replicates) of >50 are shown at branch points. Bar: 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position. The strains (type strain=T) and their corresponding GenBank accession numbers are displayed in parentheses with strain SP1PR4T shown in bold. MPL3 (AM162405) was used as outgroup. SP1PR4T and KBS 63T (DSM 18391) genome sequences have been revealed.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of SP1PR4T relative to the other type strains within the family . The maximum likelihood tree was inferred from 1,359 aligned positions of the 16S rRNA gene sequences and derived using MEGA version 5 [14]. Bootstrap values (expressed as percentages of 1,000 replicates) of >50 are shown at branch points. Bar: 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position. The strains (type strain=T) and their corresponding GenBank accession numbers are displayed in parentheses with strain SP1PR4T shown in bold. MPL3 (AM162405) was used as outgroup. SP1PR4T and KBS 63T (DSM 18391) genome sequences have been revealed. Strain SP1PR4T grows at pH 4.5-7.5 with an optimum at 6.0 and at temperatures of +4 to +30°C with an optimum of +25°C on R2 medium [3]. On R2 agar, strain SP1PR4T forms small, circular, convex colonies with a diameter of approximately 1 mm. The pigment varies from light beige to light pink depending on the age of the culture. Cells of strains SP1PR4T are Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, non-motile aerobic rods with a length of 1.5– 3.0 µm and a diameter of 0.5–0.7 µm. The cell-wall structure in ultrathin sections of electron micrographs of cells of strain SP1PR4T demonstrates numerous outer-membrane vesicles (Table 1, Figure 2).
Table 1

Classification and general features of SP1PR4T according to the MIGS recommendations [16].

MIGS ID      Property       Term     Evidence codes
      Classification       Domain Bacteria     TAS [17]
       Phylum Acidobacteria     TAS [18,19]
       Class Acidobacteria     TAS [20]
       Order Acidobacteriales     TAS [21,22]
       Family Acidobacteriaceae     TAS [18,23]
       Genus Terriglobus     TAS [1]
       Species Terriglobus saanensis     TAS [3]
       Type strain: SP1PR4T
      Gram stain       negative     TAS [3]
      Cell shape       rod     TAS [3]
      Motility       non-motile     TAS [3]
      Sporulation       non-spore forming     TAS [3]
      Temperature range       4–30°C     TAS [3]
      Optimum temperature       25°C     TAS [3]
      pH range       4.5-7.5     TAS [3]
      Optimum pH       6.0     TAS [3]
      Salinity       not reported     NAS
MIGS-22      Oxygen requirement       aerobe     TAS [3]
      Carbon source       cellobiose, D-fructose, D-galactose, D-glucose, lactose, D-maltose, D-mannose,       D-ribose, sucrose, D-trehalose, D-xylose, D-melezitose, D-raffinose, starch, pectin,       laminarin and aesculin     TAS [3]
MIGS-6      Habitat       terrestrial     TAS [3]
MIGS-15      Biotic relationship       free-living     TAS [3]
MIGS-14      Pathogenicity       non-pathogen     NAS
      Biosafety level       1     NAS
      Isolation       tundra soil     TAS [3]
MIGS-4      Geographic location       Saana fjeld, Arctic tundra, Finland     TAS [3]
MIGS-5      Sample collection time       2004-2005     TAS [3]
MIGS-4.1      Latitude       69°01’N,     TAS [3]
MIGS-4.2      Longitude       20°50’E     TAS [3]
MIGS-4.3      Depth       not reported     NAS
MIGS-4.4      Altitude       not reported     NAS

*Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [24].

Figure 2

Electron micrograph of cells of strain SP1PR4T (bar 0.5 µm).

*Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [24]. Electron micrograph of cells of strain SP1PR4T (bar 0.5 µm). Strain SP1PR4T utilized carbon substrates for growth which include cellobiose, D-fructose, D-galactose, D-glucose, lactose, D-maltose, D-mannose, D-ribose, sucrose, D-trehalose, D-xylose, D-melezitose, D-raffinose and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. Strain SP1PR4T hydrolyzed polysaccharides such as starch, pectin, laminarin and aesculin but not gelatin, cellulose, xylan, lichenan, sodium alginate, pullulan, chitosan or chitin. Enzyme activities of strain SP1PR4T include chitobiase, catalase, acid and alkaline phosphatase, leucine arylamidase, naphthol-AS-B1-phosphohydrolase, α- and β-galactosidase, α- and β-glucosidase, β-glucuronidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, α-mannosidase and α-fucosidase [3,15].

Chemotaxonomy

The major cellular fatty acids in SP1PR4T are iso-C15:0 (39.9%), C16:1 ω7c (28.4%), iso-C13:0 (9.8%) and C16:0 (9.8%). The cellular fatty acid compositions of strain SP1PR4T were relatively similar to that of DSM 18391T, with higher relative abundance of iso-C13:0 and a corresponding lower abundance of iso-C15:0 in strain SP1PR4T [3].

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

Strain SP1PR4T was selected for sequencing in 2009 by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) community sequencing program. The Quality Draft (QD) assembly and annotation were completed on August 6, 2010. The complete genome was made available on Jan 24, 2011. The genome project is deposited in the Genomes On-Line Database (GOLD) [25] and the complete genome sequence of strain SP1PR4T is deposited in GenBank. Table 2 presents the project information and its association with MIGS version 2.0 [16].
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information.

MIGS ID     Property      Term
MIGS 31     Finishing quality      Finished
MIGS-28     Libraries used      Three libraries, an Illumina GAii shotgun library (GSGY),      a 454 Titanium standard library (GSXT, GWTA) and a paired end 454 (GSFP) library
MIGS 29     Sequencing platforms      454 Titanium standard, 454 Paired End, Illumina
MIGS 31.2     Sequencing coverage      39× (454), 180× (Illumina)
MIGS 30     Assemblers      Newbler, Velvet, Phrap
MIGS 32     Gene calling method      ProdigaL, GenePRIMP
     Locud Tag      AciPR4
     INSDC / RefSeq ID      CP002467, NC_014963,
     GenBank Date of Release      October 7, 2011
     GOLD ID      Gc01604
     NCBI project ID      48971
MIGS 13     Source material identifier      ATCC BAA-1853, DSM 23119
     Project relevance      Environmental, Biogeochemical cycling of carbon, Biotechnological, GEBA

Growth conditions and genomic DNA extraction

Strain SP1PR4T was cultivated in R2 medium as previously described [3]. Genomic DNA (gDNA) of high sequencing quality was isolated using a modified CTAB method and evaluated according to the Quality Control (QC) guidelines provided by the DOE Joint Genome Institute.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The finished genome of SP1PR4T (JGI ID 4088690) was generated at the DOE Joint genome Institute (JGI) using a combination of Illumina [26] and 454 technologies [27]. For this genome, an Illumina GAii shotgun library which generated 23,685,130 reads totaling 916 Mb, a 454 Titanium standard library which generated 409,633 reads and a paired end 454 library with an average insert size of 10.8 kb which generated 180,451 reads totaling 157 Mb of 454 data, were constructed and sequenced. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing performed at the JGI can be found at the JGI website [28]. The 454 Titanium standard data and the 454 paired end data were assembled together with Newbler, version 2.3. Illumina sequencing data was assembled with Velvet, version 0.7.63 [29]. We integrated the 454 Newbler consensus shreds, the Illumina Velvet consensus shreds and the read pairs in the 454 paired end library using parallel phrap, version SPS - 4.24 (High Performance Software, LLC). The software Consed [30,31] was used in the finishing process. Illumina data was used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using the software Polisher developed at JGI (Alla Lapidus, unpublished). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected using gapResolution (Cliff Han, unpublished), Dupfinisher [32], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with sub-cloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR (J-F Cheng, unpublished) primer walks. The final assembly is based on 157 Mb of 454 data which provides an average 39× coverage and 916 Mb of Illumina data which provides an average 180× coverage of the genome.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [33] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [34]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, (COGs) [35,36], and InterPro. These data sources were combined to assert a product description for each predicted protein. Non-coding genes and miscellaneous features were predicted using tRNAscan-SE [37], RNAMMer [38], Rfam [39], TMHMM [40], and signalP [41]. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation were performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [42].

Genome properties

The genome consists of one circular chromosome of 5,095,226 bp in size with a GC content of 57.3% and consists of 54 RNA genes (Figure 3, Table 3). Of the 4,333 predicted genes, 4,279 are protein-coding genes (CDSs) and 99 are pseudogenes. Of the total CDSs, 67% represent COG functional categories and 43% consist of signal peptides. The distribution of genes into COG functional categories is presented in Figure 3 and Table 4.
Figure 3

Graphical representation of circular map of the chromosome of strain SP1PR4T displaying relevant genome features. From outside to center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 3

Genome statistics

Attribute     Value     % of Total
Genome size (bp)     5,095,226     100%
DNA coding (bp)     4,578,206     89.9%
DNA G+C (bp)     2,921,371     57.3%
Number of replicons     1     100%
Total genes     4,334     100%
RNA genes     54     1.3%
rRNA operons     1     -
Protein coding genes     4,180     98.8%
Pseudo genes     99     2.3%
Genes with function prediction     3,203     73.9%
Genes in paralog clusters     2,220     51.2%
Genes assigned to COGs     3,170     73.2%
Genes with Pfam domains     3,108     71.7%
Genes with signal peptides     1,867     43.1%
Genes with transmembrane helices     1,082     25%
CRISPR repeats     0     -
Table 4

Number of genes associated with general COG functional categories.

Code    Value     %age         Description
J    163.0     4.6         Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    2.0     0.1         RNA processing and modificatin
K    293.0     8.3         Transcription
L    142.0     4.0         Replication, recombination and repair
B    0.0     0.0         Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    24.0     0.7         Cell cycle control, Cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y    0.0     0.0         Nuclear structure
V    98.0     2.8         Defense mechanisms
T    174.0     4.9         Signal transduction mechanisms
M    307.0     8.7         Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N    56.0     1.6         Cell motility
Z    2.0     0.1         Cytoskeleton
W    0.0     0.0         Extracellular structures
U    113.0     3.2         Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O    122.0     3.4         Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    196.0     5.5         Energy production and conversion
G    303.0     8.6         Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    243.0     6.9         Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    69.0     2.0         Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    134.0     3.8         Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    116.0     3.3         Lipid transport and metabolism
P    134.0     3.8         Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    85.0     2.4         Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    443.0     12.5         General function prediction only
S    323.0     9.1         Function unknown
-    1163.0     26.8         Not in COGs
Graphical representation of circular map of the chromosome of strain SP1PR4T displaying relevant genome features. From outside to center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Discussion

Genome analysis of identified a high abundance of genes assigned to COG functional categories for transport and metabolism carbohydrates (9.5%) and amino acids (7.6%), energy conversion (6.2%), cell envelope biogenesis (9.6%) and transcription (9.2%) [15]. This indicates that the genome encodes for functions involved in transport and utilization of nutrients, mainly carbohydrates and amino acids for energy production and cell biogenesis to maintain cell integrity in cold tundra soils. Further genome analysis revealed an abundance of gene modules for glycoside hydrolases, glycosyl transferases, polysaccharide lyases, carbohydrate esterases, and non-catalytic carbohydrate-binding modules within the carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZy [43]) family involved in breakdown, utilization and biosynthesis of carbohydrates [15]. hydrolyzed complex carbon polymers, including pectin, laminarin, and starch, and utilized sugars such as cellobiose, D-mannose, D-xylose, D-trehalose and laminarin. This parallels genome predictions for CDSs encoding for enzymes such as pectinases, chitinases, alginate lyases, trehalase and amylases. was unable to hydrolyze carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) on plate assays and lacked CDSs encoding for cellulases involved in cellulose hydrolysis. However, the genome contained a BcsZ gene encoding for an endocellulase (GH8) as part of a bacterial cellulose synthesis (bcs) operon involved in cellulose biosynthesis in several species. This operon consists of clusters of genes in close proximity to the BcsZ gene which includes a cellulose synthase gene (bcsAB), a cellulose synthase operon protein (bcsC) and a cellulose synthase operon protein (yhj) [15]. In addition, the genome encoded for a large number of gene modules representing glycosyl transferases (GTs) involved in carbohydrate biosynthesis which include cellulose synthase (UDP-forming), α-trehalose phosphate synthase [UDP-forming], starch glucosyl transferase, ceramide β-glucosyltransferase involved in biosynthesis of cellulose, trehalose, starch, hopanoid, and capsular/free exopolysaccharide (EPS) [15]. This suggests that is involved in hydrolysis of lignocellulosic soil organic matter, utilization of stored carbohydrates and biosynthesis of exopolysaccharides. Therefore, we surmise that may be central to carbon cycling processes in Arctic and boreal soil ecosystems.
  34 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  The nomenclatural types of the orders Acholeplasmatales, Halanaerobiales, Halobacteriales, Methanobacteriales, Methanococcales, Methanomicrobiales, Planctomycetales, Prochlorales, Sulfolobales, Thermococcales, Thermoproteales and Verrucomicrobiales are the genera Acholeplasma, Halanaerobium, Halobacterium, Methanobacterium, Methanococcus, Methanomicrobium, Planctomyces, Prochloron, Sulfolobus, Thermococcus, Thermoproteus and Verrucomicrobium, respectively. Opinion 79.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  Effect of pH on isolation and distribution of members of subdivision 1 of the phylum Acidobacteria occurring in soil.

Authors:  Michelle Sait; Kathryn E R Davis; Peter H Janssen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing.

Authors:  D Gordon; C Abajian; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Sensitivity of boreal forest carbon balance to soil thaw

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Comparative genomic and physiological analysis provides insights into the role of Acidobacteria in organic carbon utilization in Arctic tundra soils.

Authors:  Suman R Rawat; Minna K Männistö; Yana Bromberg; Max M Häggblom
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.194

10.  Isolation and characterization of soil bacteria that define Terriglobus gen. nov., in the phylum Acidobacteria.

Authors:  Stephanie A Eichorst; John A Breznak; Thomas M Schmidt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  9 in total

1.  Diversity of bacterial communities along a petroleum contamination gradient in desert soils.

Authors:  Raeid M M Abed; Sumaiya Al-Kindi; Samiha Al-Kharusi
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Comparison of bacterial community structures of terrestrial cyanobacterium Nostoc flagelliforme in three different regions of China using PCR-DGGE analysis.

Authors:  Pei-pei Han; Shi-gang Shen; Shi-ru Jia; Hui-yan Wang; Cheng Zhong; Zhi-lei Tan; He-xin Lv
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Complete genome sequence of Granulicella mallensis type strain MP5ACTX8(T), an acidobacterium from tundra soil.

Authors:  Suman R Rawat; Minna K Männistö; Valentin Starovoytov; Lynne Goodwin; Matt Nolan; Loren J Hauser; Miriam Land; Karen Walston Davenport; Tanja Woyke; Max M Häggblom
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-09-30

4.  Effects of a ciliate protozoa predator on microbial communities in pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea) leaves.

Authors:  Taylor K Paisie; Thomas E Miller; Olivia U Mason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The Ecology of Acidobacteria: Moving beyond Genes and Genomes.

Authors:  Anna M Kielak; Cristine C Barreto; George A Kowalchuk; Johannes A van Veen; Eiko E Kuramae
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Evolutionary novelty in gravity sensing through horizontal gene transfer and high-order protein assembly.

Authors:  Tu Anh Nguyen; Jamie Greig; Asif Khan; Cara Goh; Gregory Jedd
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 7.  Recent Understanding of Soil Acidobacteria and Their Ecological Significance: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Sadaf Kalam; Anirban Basu; Iqbal Ahmad; R Z Sayyed; Hesham Ali El-Enshasy; Daniel Joe Dailin; Ni Luh Suriani
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  When your host shuts down: larval diapause impacts host-microbiome interactions in Nasonia vitripennis.

Authors:  Jessica Dittmer; Robert M Brucker
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 14.650

9.  Complete genome sequence of Granulicella tundricola type strain MP5ACTX9(T), an Acidobacteria from tundra soil.

Authors:  Suman R Rawat; Minna K Männistö; Valentin Starovoytov; Lynne Goodwin; Matt Nolan; Loren Hauser; Miriam Land; Karen Walston Davenport; Tanja Woyke; Max M Häggblom
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2013-12-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.