Literature DB >> 32021041

Does negative pressure intrusion cementing technique improve the cement penetration under the tibial component? A comparative retrospective study.

Giorgio Cacciola1, Federico De Meo1, Pietro Cavaliere1.   

Abstract

Intramedullary suction cementing technique of the tibial component has the theoretical advantage to allow a deeper cement penetration trough the cancellous bone. The aim of this study is to compare the cement penetration under the tibial component between patients that underwent tibial component cementation with or without the use of intramedullary suction. Two-hundred-twenty-four patients underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) during the study period, One-hundred-twenty-two TKAs using intramedullary suction with negative pressure (55.4%), while one-hundred-two TKAs without intramedullary suction (44.6%). We found that the intra-operative suction during cement application increase the depth of cement penetration better than pulsed lavage alone.
© 2019 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cementing technique; Intramedullary suction; TKA; Total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2019        PMID: 32021041      PMCID: PMC6994812          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  18 in total

1.  Irrigation and suction technique to ensure reliable cement penetration for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M R Norton; K S Eyres
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Suction technique to improve cement penetration under the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kate Stannage; David Shakespeare; Max Bulsara
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Cementing techniques for the tibial component in primary total knee replacement.

Authors:  D T Cawley; N Kelly; J P McGarry; F J Shannon
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Fionna Mowat; Kevin Ong; Nathan Chan; Edmund Lau; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  A comparison of outcomes with and without a tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ilhan Alcelik; Raymond D Pollock; Mohammed Sukeik; Josette Bettany-Saltikov; Patrick M Armstrong; Peter Fismer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 6.  Fatigue properties of acrylic bone cements: review of the literature.

Authors:  W Krause; R S Mathis
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1988-04

7.  Use of a Tourniquet in Total Knee Arthroplasty Causes a Paradoxical Increase in Total Blood Loss.

Authors:  Timothy Schnettler; Natalie Papillon; Harold Rees
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Modifications of Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Cement for Application in Orthopedic Surgery.

Authors:  Yue Sa; Fang Yang; Yining Wang; Joop G C Wolke; John A Jansen
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.622

9.  Mechanical and elution properties of G3 Low Viscosity bone cement loaded up to three antibiotics.

Authors:  Giorgio Cacciola; Federico De Meo; Pietro Cavaliere
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-09-06

10.  The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Vanessa Chiu; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.