Literature DB >> 3204566

Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: the views of a cohort of non-attenders.

R Pill, N Stott.   

Abstract

Two hundred and fifty-nine men and women aged 20-45 years who did not respond to an offer from their general practitioner for a health check were interviewed at home to explore the reasons for non-response. There was no support for the view that the invitation aroused anxiety or that the administrative arrangements had been a barrier to acceptance. Many subjects were not really interested (44%) or just forgot to attend (24%). Crises at work or home (26%) and current attendance at a doctor (16%) were other reasons offered, while 11% felt screening to be in appropriate. There is little that can be done to change these rates except by a shift of public opinion to more consumer demand for health checks or by more opportunistic health checks when people attend their doctors for other reasons. The dangers of marketing health checks to increase consumer demand are discussed in the light of these findings and other work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3204566      PMCID: PMC1711246     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract        ISSN: 0035-8797


  10 in total

1.  Motivation to participate in cancer screening programmes.

Authors:  D R Schwoon; H J Schmoll
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Validation of screening procedures.

Authors:  A L Cochrane; W W Holland
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  The effect of income on use of preventive care: an evaluation of alternative explanations.

Authors:  T G Rundall; J R Wheeler
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1979-12

4.  Attendance for cervical screening--whose problem?

Authors:  A Eardley; A K Elkind; B Spencer; P Hobbs; L L Pendleton; D Haran
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Attendance at a breast screening clinic: a problem of administration or attitudes.

Authors:  K French; A M Porter; S E Robinson; F M McCallum; J G Howie; M M Roberts
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982 Aug 28-Sep 4

Review 6.  Health promotion and the human response to loss: clinical implications of a decade of primary health care research.

Authors:  N C Stott; R M Pill
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.267

7.  Increased absenteeism from work after detection and labeling of hypertensive patients.

Authors:  R B Haynes; D L Sackett; D W Taylor; E S Gibson; A L Johnson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-10-05       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Hypertension labeling and sense of well-being.

Authors:  J R Bloom; S Monterossa
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Women who decline breast screening.

Authors:  U Maclean; D Sinfield; S Klein; B Harnden
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: comparison of attenders and non-attenders.

Authors:  R Pill; J French; K Harding; N Stott
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1988-02
  10 in total
  20 in total

1.  Diabetes and its care--what do patients expect?

Authors:  A L Kinmonth; E Murphy; T Marteau
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-08

2.  Coronary heart disease: preventable but not prevented?

Authors:  J T Hart
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Health checks for adults.

Authors:  J Levine; R Price
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-07-07

4.  General practice in deprived areas: problems and solutions.

Authors:  A Hastings; A Rashid
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Evaluation of a practice-based programme of health checks: financial cost and success at risk detection.

Authors:  G Sacks; R Marsden
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-09

6.  Health checks in general practice: another example of inverse care?

Authors:  D Waller; M Agass; D Mant; A Coulter; A Fuller; L Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-04-28

7.  Comparison of participants and non-participants to the ORISCAV-LUX population-based study on cardiovascular risk factors in Luxembourg.

Authors:  Ala'a Alkerwi; Nicolas Sauvageot; Sophie Couffignal; Adelin Albert; Marie-Lise Lair; Michèle Guillaume
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Screen detected high blood pressure under 40: a general practice population followed up for 21 years.

Authors:  J T Hart; C Edwards; M Hart; J Jones; M Jones; A Haines; G Watt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-02-13

9.  Case against targeting long term non-attenders in general practice for a health check.

Authors:  K J Thomas; J P Nicholl; M Fall; A Lowy; B T Williams
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Twenty five years of case finding and audit in a socially deprived community.

Authors:  J T Hart; C Thomas; B Gibbons; C Edwards; M Hart; J Jones; M Jones; P Walton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.