Literature DB >> 23443980

The gait of patients with one resurfacing and one replacement hip: a single blinded controlled study.

Adeel Aqil1, Roshan Drabu, Jeroen H Bergmann, Milad Masjedi, Victoria Manning, Barry Andrews, Sarah K Muirhead-Allwood, Justin P Cobb.   

Abstract

PURPOSES: Post arthroplasty gait analysis has up till now been performed on subjects walking slowly on flat ground rather than challenging them at faster speeds or walking uphill. We therefore asked: (1) Is there a measurable difference in the performance of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) limbs at patients' self-determined fastest walking speeds and steepest inclines? and (2) Is there a relationship between the observed differences between the gait of HRA and THA implanted limbs and patient walking speeds and inclines.
METHODS: In an ethically approved study we recruited patients with bilateral hip arthroplasties: one HRA and one THA. Nine subjects were assessed using an instrumented treadmill at a range of speeds and inclines by a blinded observer. The ground reaction forces of subjects were recorded and an age, sex and BMI matched control group was used for comparison.
RESULTS: Increasing walking speed correlated strongly with between leg differences in weight acceptance (r = 0.9, p = 0.000) and push-off force (r = 0.79, p = 0.002). HRA implanted limbs accepted significantly more weight at top walking speeds (1208 N ± 320 versus 1279 N ± 370, p = 0.026) and pushed off with greater force when walking uphill (818 N ± 163 versus 855 ± 166, p = 0.012). HRA limbs more closely approximated to the gait of the normal control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Arthroplasty implants do have an impact on the gait characteristics of patients. Differences in gait are more likely to be evident when assessment is made at fast speeds and walking uphill. This study suggests that HRA may enable a more normal gait.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23443980      PMCID: PMC3631476          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1819-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  13 in total

1.  Knee joint kinematics from familiarised treadmill walking can be generalised to overground walking in young unimpaired subjects.

Authors:  A Matsas; N Taylor; H McBurney
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Letter to the editor: The functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  Justin Cobb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Gait analysis after total hip replacement with hip resurfacing implant or Mallory-head Exeter prosthesis: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Mette K Petersen; Niels T Andersen; Poul Mogensen; Michael Voight; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of ten years.

Authors:  R B C Treacy; C W McBryde; E Shears; P B Pynsent
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-01

5.  High failure rates when avoiding obstacles during treadmill walking in patients with a transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Cheriel J Hofstad; Harmen van der Linde; Bart Nienhuis; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Jacques Duysens; Alexander C Geurts
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients.

Authors:  R P Baker; T C B Pollard; S J Eastaugh-Waring; G C Bannister
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-02

7.  Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Thorsten M Seyler; Phillip S Ragland; Roland Starr; Jochen Erhart; Anil Bhave
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Locomotion speed determines gait variability in cerebellar ataxia and vestibular failure.

Authors:  Roman Schniepp; Maximilian Wuehr; Maximilian Neuhaeusser; Maria Kamenova; Konstantin Dimitriadis; Thomas Klopstock; M Strupp; Thomas Brandt; Klaus Jahn
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 10.338

9.  Evidence for bilaterally delayed and decreased obstacle avoidance responses while walking with a lower limb prosthesis.

Authors:  Cheriel J Hofstad; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Harmen van der Linde; Bart Nienhuis; Alexander C Geurts; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  The John Charnley Award: The functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  Martin Lavigne; Marc Therrien; Julie Nantel; Alain Roy; François Prince; Pascal-André Vendittoli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  17 in total

1.  Correlation between groin pain and cup design of hip-resurfacing implants: a prospective study.

Authors:  Julien Girard; Erwan Pansard; Reda Ouahes; Henri Migaud; Cyril Delay; Laurent Vasseur
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Wear testing of a canine hip resurfacing implant that uses highly cross-linked polyethylene.

Authors:  Kevin J Warburton; John B Everingham; Jillian L Helms; Andrew J Kazanovicz; Katherine A Hollar; Jeff D Brourman; Steven M Fox; Trevor J Lujan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  The impact of standard combined anteversion definitions on gait and clinical outcome within one year after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Weber; Tim Weber; Michael Woerner; Benjamin Craiovan; Michael Worlicek; Sebastian Winkler; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  The future role of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray; Ronan B C Treacy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Long-term results of Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Masaki Takao; Hidetoshi Hamada; Takashi Sakai; Kenji Ohzono; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 1.731

6.  Resurfacing head size and femoral fracture: Are registry conclusions on head size justified?

Authors:  Adeel Aqil; Anatole Wiik; Susannah Clarke; Milad Masjedi; Justin Cobb
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-25

7.  Mortality after hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty in young patients: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Peter J Brooks; Linsen T Samuel; Jay M Levin; Assem A Sultan; Anton Khlopas; David Brigati; Mitchell Ng; A Seth Greenwald; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-02

8.  Activity levels following hip resurfacing arthroplasty: A tool to help manage patient expectations.

Authors:  Jack W Martin; Mark A Williams; Karen L Barker
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07

Review 9.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in patients younger than 50 years: a retrospective analysis : 1285 cases, 12-year survivorship.

Authors:  Melissa D Gaillard; Thomas P Gross
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Hard-on-hard lubrication in the artificial hip under dynamic loading conditions.

Authors:  Robert Sonntag; Jörn Reinders; Johannes S Rieger; Daniel W W Heitzmann; J Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.