PURPOSES: Post arthroplasty gait analysis has up till now been performed on subjects walking slowly on flat ground rather than challenging them at faster speeds or walking uphill. We therefore asked: (1) Is there a measurable difference in the performance of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) limbs at patients' self-determined fastest walking speeds and steepest inclines? and (2) Is there a relationship between the observed differences between the gait of HRA and THA implanted limbs and patient walking speeds and inclines. METHODS: In an ethically approved study we recruited patients with bilateral hip arthroplasties: one HRA and one THA. Nine subjects were assessed using an instrumented treadmill at a range of speeds and inclines by a blinded observer. The ground reaction forces of subjects were recorded and an age, sex and BMI matched control group was used for comparison. RESULTS: Increasing walking speed correlated strongly with between leg differences in weight acceptance (r = 0.9, p = 0.000) and push-off force (r = 0.79, p = 0.002). HRA implanted limbs accepted significantly more weight at top walking speeds (1208 N ± 320 versus 1279 N ± 370, p = 0.026) and pushed off with greater force when walking uphill (818 N ± 163 versus 855 ± 166, p = 0.012). HRA limbs more closely approximated to the gait of the normal control group. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroplasty implants do have an impact on the gait characteristics of patients. Differences in gait are more likely to be evident when assessment is made at fast speeds and walking uphill. This study suggests that HRA may enable a more normal gait.
PURPOSES: Post arthroplasty gait analysis has up till now been performed on subjects walking slowly on flat ground rather than challenging them at faster speeds or walking uphill. We therefore asked: (1) Is there a measurable difference in the performance of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) limbs at patients' self-determined fastest walking speeds and steepest inclines? and (2) Is there a relationship between the observed differences between the gait of HRA and THA implanted limbs and patient walking speeds and inclines. METHODS: In an ethically approved study we recruited patients with bilateral hip arthroplasties: one HRA and one THA. Nine subjects were assessed using an instrumented treadmill at a range of speeds and inclines by a blinded observer. The ground reaction forces of subjects were recorded and an age, sex and BMI matched control group was used for comparison. RESULTS: Increasing walking speed correlated strongly with between leg differences in weight acceptance (r = 0.9, p = 0.000) and push-off force (r = 0.79, p = 0.002). HRA implanted limbs accepted significantly more weight at top walking speeds (1208 N ± 320 versus 1279 N ± 370, p = 0.026) and pushed off with greater force when walking uphill (818 N ± 163 versus 855 ± 166, p = 0.012). HRA limbs more closely approximated to the gait of the normal control group. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroplasty implants do have an impact on the gait characteristics of patients. Differences in gait are more likely to be evident when assessment is made at fast speeds and walking uphill. This study suggests that HRA may enable a more normal gait.
Authors: Cheriel J Hofstad; Harmen van der Linde; Bart Nienhuis; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Jacques Duysens; Alexander C Geurts Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Michael A Mont; Thorsten M Seyler; Phillip S Ragland; Roland Starr; Jochen Erhart; Anil Bhave Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Roman Schniepp; Maximilian Wuehr; Maximilian Neuhaeusser; Maria Kamenova; Konstantin Dimitriadis; Thomas Klopstock; M Strupp; Thomas Brandt; Klaus Jahn Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2011-10-13 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Cheriel J Hofstad; Vivian Weerdesteyn; Harmen van der Linde; Bart Nienhuis; Alexander C Geurts; Jacques Duysens Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2009-04-11 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Kevin J Warburton; John B Everingham; Jillian L Helms; Andrew J Kazanovicz; Katherine A Hollar; Jeff D Brourman; Steven M Fox; Trevor J Lujan Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Markus Weber; Tim Weber; Michael Woerner; Benjamin Craiovan; Michael Worlicek; Sebastian Winkler; Joachim Grifka; Tobias Renkawitz Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Peter J Brooks; Linsen T Samuel; Jay M Levin; Assem A Sultan; Anton Khlopas; David Brigati; Mitchell Ng; A Seth Greenwald; Michael A Mont Journal: Ann Transl Med Date: 2019-02
Authors: Robert Sonntag; Jörn Reinders; Johannes S Rieger; Daniel W W Heitzmann; J Philippe Kretzer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 3.240