Literature DB >> 26275544

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis in adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Yoshiro Taguchi1, Shunichiro Komatsu2,3, Eiji Sakamoto2, Shinji Norimizu2, Yuji Shingu2, Hiroshi Hasegawa2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess whether laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for complicated appendicitis (CA) effectively reduces the incidence of postoperative complications and improves various measurements of postoperative recovery in adults compared with open appendectomy (OA).
METHODS: This single-center, randomized controlled trial was performed in the Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital. Patients diagnosed as having CA with peritonitis or abscess formation were eligible to participate and were randomly assigned to an LA group or an OA group. The primary study outcome was development of infectious complications, especially surgical site infection (SSI), within 30 days of surgery.
RESULTS: Between October 2008 and August 2014, 81 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned with a 1:1 allocation ratio (42, LA; 39, OA). All were eligible for study of the primary endpoint. Groups were well balanced in terms of patient characteristics and preoperative levels of C-reactive protein. SSI occurred in 14 LA group patients (33.3 %) and in 10 OA group patients (25.6 %) (OR 1.450, 95 % CI 0.553-3.800; p = 0.476). Overall, the rate of postoperative complications, including incisional or organ/space SSI and stump leakage, did not differ significantly between groups. No significant differences between groups were found in hospital stay, duration of drainage, analgesic use, or parameters for postoperative recovery except days to walking.
CONCLUSION: These results suggested that LA for CA is safe and feasible, while the distinguishing benefit of LA was not validated in this clinical trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complicated appendicitis; Complication; Laparoscopic surgery; Open surgery; RCT

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26275544     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4453-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  34 in total

1.  CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections.

Authors:  T C Horan; R P Gaynes; W J Martone; W R Jarvis; T G Emori
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  Treatment strategy when using intraoperative peritoneal lavage for perforated appendicitis in children: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Yasuharu Ohno; Junichiro Furui; Takashi Kanematsu
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Markides; Daren Subar; Kallingal Riyad
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Securing the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy: evidence for routine stapling?

Authors:  G Kazemier; K H in't Hof; S Saad; H J Bonjer; S Sauerland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The laparoscopic approach for perforated appendicitis, including cases complicated by abscess formation.

Authors:  Hyoung-Chul Park; Dae-Hyun Yang; Bong-Hwa Lee
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.878

6.  Role of drains in laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis at a busy county hospital.

Authors:  Andrea M Pakula; Ruby Skinner; Amber Jones; Ray Chung; Maureen Martin
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Comparison of the outcomes of laparoscopic and open approaches in the treatment of periappendiceal abscess diagnosed by radiologic investigation.

Authors:  Sunchul Yeom; Min Sung Kim; Seulkee Park; Taeil Son; Yoon Young Jung; Seung Ah Lee; Yeon Soo Chang; Dong Hee Kim; Joon Kil Han
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.878

8.  A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon).

Authors:  Constantinos Simillis; Panayiotis Symeonides; Andrew J Shorthouse; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  Manish M Tiwari; Jason F Reynoso; Albert W Tsang; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Impact of a randomized clinical trial on children with perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Regan F Williams; Rodrigo B Interiano; Elizabeth Paton; James W Eubanks; Eunice Y Huang; Max R Langham; Martin L Blakely
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendicectomy in Adults with Complicated Appendicitis: an Update of the Literature.

Authors:  Christos Athanasiou; Sonia Lockwood; Georgios A Markides
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Bad bacteria in acute appendicitis: rare but relevant.

Authors:  Alexander Reinisch; Patrizia Malkomes; Nils Habbe; Wolf Otto Bechstein; Juliane Liese
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy is superior to open surgery for complicated appendicitis.

Authors:  Gaik S Quah; Guy D Eslick; Michael R Cox
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in adults: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ahmed Talha; Hany El-Haddad; Abd-Elhamid Ghazal; Gihan Shehata
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Practice does not always make perfect: need for selection curricula in modern surgical training.

Authors:  Marisa Louridas; Peter Szasz; Andras B Fecso; Michael G Zywiel; Parisa Lak; Ayse B Bener; Kenneth A Harris; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Liping Dai; Jian Shuai
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  The Influence of the Appendiceal Base Diameter on Appendix Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

Authors:  Samir Delibegović; Zlatan Mehmedović
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Thomas Jaschinski; Christoph G Mosch; Michaela Eikermann; Edmund Am Neugebauer; Stefan Sauerland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-28

9.  Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy with the help of a needle grasper: better cosmetic results and fewer trocars than conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Turgut Donmez; Oguzhan Sunamak; Sina Ferahman; Server Sezgin Uludag; Dogan Yildirim; Adnan Hut
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 10.  Acute appendicitis: proposal of a new comprehensive grading system based on clinical, imaging and laparoscopic findings.

Authors:  Carlos Augusto Gomes; Massimo Sartelli; Salomone Di Saverio; Luca Ansaloni; Fausto Catena; Federico Coccolini; Kenji Inaba; Demetrios Demetriades; Felipe Couto Gomes; Camila Couto Gomes
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.