| Literature DB >> 23442222 |
Scott E Levison1, Paul Fisher, Jenny Hankinson, Leo Zeef, Steve Eyre, William E Ollier, John T McLaughlin, Andy Brass, Richard K Grencis, Joanne L Pennock.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic susceptibility to colonic inflammation is poorly defined at the gene level. Although Genome Wide Association studies (GWAS) have identified loci in the human genome which confer susceptibility to Inflammatory Bowel Disease (Crohn's and Ulcerative Colitis), it is not clear if precise loci exist which confer susceptibility to inflammation at specific locations within the gut e.g. small versus large intestine. Susceptibility loci for colitis in particular have been defined in the mouse, although specific candidate genes have not been identified to date. We have previously shown that infection with Trichuris muris (T. muris) induces chronic colitis in susceptible mouse strains with clinical, histological, and immunological homology to human colonic Crohn's disease. We performed an integrative analysis of colitis susceptibility, using an F2 inter-cross of resistant (BALB/c) and susceptible (AKR) mice following T. muris infection. Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL), polymorphic and expression data were analysed alongside in silico workflow analyses to discover novel candidate genes central to the development and biology of chronic colitis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23442222 PMCID: PMC3621453 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Phenotype data. A) Colonic worm burden across the F2 population with parental strains. B) Serum IgG1:IgG2a ratio was significantly different between resistant (0 worms) and susceptible (>0 worms) groups. C) Normal colonic histology in resistant mouse with predominant serum IgG1 (x100 magnification. H&E stain. Bar = 200μm). Histological mucosal and submucosal colonic inflammation, with crypt hyperplasia and elongation, seen in the vicinity of (D), and away from (E) T. muris colonic worms (arrow). F) Serum IgG1:IgG2a ratio, and G) colonic worm count correlate with histological inflammatory features.
Summary of QTL () found across the genome
| Tm1 | 1 | 2.39 | Serum IgG’s Worm count | −8.3 | 90 | 68 | ||
| Tm3 | 3 | 2.80 | Serum IgG’s Worm count | 8.4 | 342 | 270 | ||
| Tm4 | 4 | 3.23 | Serum IgG’s | −5.3 | 311 | 289 | ||
| Tm10 | 10 | 4.10 | Worm count | - | 27 | 24 | ||
| Tm11 | 11 | 4.14 | Serum IgG’s Worm count | −0.3 | 265 | 182 | ||
| Tm12 | 12 | 4.7 | Serum IgG’s Worm count | −10.7 | 95 | 75 | ||
| Tm17 | 17 | 8.04 | Serum IgG’s Worm count | −5.7 | 287 | 251 |
aFor non-parametric traits, Kruskal Wallis values were converted to LOD according to published methods [13].
Figure 2overlays the colitic QTL. Previous congenic analysis defined Cdcs1 between 87.1 and 131.1 Mbp (solid box), and overlays gpdc1 (dashed box), a mouse QTL which also correlates with spontaneous colitis. T. muris QTL Tm3 (broken line) lies between D3Mit156 (92 Mbp) and D3Mit79 (118 Mbp), outside the location of a previously defined candidate gene NfkB1 (135.1 Mbp). The threshold for suggestive correlation is shown for Tm3 at LOD 2.4.
Figure 3Flow diagram showing unbiased identification of candidate genes in identified QTL. 3.1: Genes within QTL were identified and assigned biological pathways. 3.2: In parallel, genes in QTL with different relative expression between parental strains were assigned biological pathways. 3.3 &3.4: Genes within commonly identified pathways were ranked according to SNP number (AKR vs BALB/c http://www.sanger.ac.uk).
Significantly expressed genes possessing strain-specific SNPs and a designated biological (KEGG) pathway
| Chemokine signalling pathway | 2047 | Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis | 18 | ||
| | Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis | | | Hematopoietic cell lineage | |
| | Focal adhesion | | | Leishmaniasis | |
| | Leukocyte transendothelial migration | | | Phagosome | |
| | T cell receptor signalling pathway | | | Systemic lupus erythematosus | |
| | B cell receptor signalling pathway | | Spliceosome | 9 | |
| | Regulation of actin cytoskeleton | | | | |
| Butanoate metabolism | 134 | Cell adhesion moleculaes (CAMs) | 8 | ||
| | Metabolic pathways | | | Leukocyte transendothelial migration | |
| | Synthesis and degradation of ketone | | | Malaria | |
| | Terpenoid backbone biosynthesis | | Cell cycle | 7 | |
| | Valine, leuckine and isoleucine degradation | | | | |
| Antigen processing and presentation | 120 | Metabolic pathways | 2 | ||
| | Lysosome | | | Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation | |
| | Phagosome | | | | |
| Lysosome | 92 | Drug metabolism – cytochrome P450 | 2 | ||
| Circadian rhythm | 76 | | Glutathione metabolism | | |
| | | | | Metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome p450 | |
| Drug metabolism – cytochrome P450 | 73 | Metabolic pathways | 2 | ||
| | Glutathione metabolism | | | Steroid hormone biosynthesis | |
| | Metabolism of xenobiotcis by cytochrome P450 | | | | |
| Beta-Alanin metabolism | 24 | Drug metabolism – cytochrome p450 | 1 | ||
| | Drug metabolism – other enzymes | | | | |
| | Metabolic pathways | | Drug metabolism – cytochrome p450 | 1 | |
| | Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis | | | | |
| Pyrimidine metabolism | Systemic lupus erythematosus | 1 |
Significantly expressed genes possessing strain-specific SNPs but as of yet, undesignated a biological (KEGG) pathway
| Slc22a150 | 0.0219 | 19 |
| Selenbp1 | 0.0065 | 19 |
| Mov10 | 0.0063 | 3 |
| Ppm1j | 0.0013 | 3 |
| Pogz | 0.0009 | 8 |
| Extl2 | 0.0008 | 2 |
| Igsf3 | 0.0007 | 177 |
| Ptpn22 | 0.0006 | 276 |
| Selenbp2 | 0.0004 | 21 |
| Wdr | 0.0004 | 1 |
| Cd53 | 0.0002 | 92 |
| Cttnbp2nl | 0 | 55 |
| Golph3l | 0 | 34 |
| 4933421E11Rsk | 0 | 19 |
| Eps8l3 | 0 | 1 |
Genes ranked according to text-mining significance, and SNP number for each gene noted. (QTL Chromosome 3, TM3). The top candidate is highlighted in bold: S100a10 had the highest cosine vector score demonstrating maximum relevance in the literature.
Transcript profiling: Microarray data has been submitted to ArrayExpress. Accession number E-MEXP-3098.
Figure 4Colonic gene expression by independent qPCR. Results are displayed relative to naïve resistant BALB/c, following standardization and normalization of samples against housekeeper gene (β-actin). Shown are the top 3 candidates by pathway & SNP analysis (Table 1: Vav3, Hmgcs2 & CTSS), the current strongest candidate gene from the literature (Fcgr1), the candidate with the highest text mining score but no designated biological pathway (Table 3: S100a10) and the candidate with the most SNPs but as yet without a designated pathway (Table 3: Ptpn22). Open bars denote susceptible AKR, shaded bars denote resistant BALB/c.