Literature DB >> 8897207

Logarithmic distribution of amplitudes of compound muscle action potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

J F Nielsen1.   

Abstract

Motor evoked potentials were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle on the dominant side evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in 20 healthy volunteers. Amplitude data revealed skewness of distribution and variance heterogeneity. Natural logarithmic transformation of amplitude data results in normal distribution and ensures variance homogeneity. There was a negative first-order autocorrelation between consecutive recordings, which indicates that a stimulus-free interval of 5 s in consecutive stimulations is insufficient to ensure independent events. In a variability study, no systematic changes in latency and amplitude during day-to-day examinations or in consecutive examinations were found. There was a significant change in latency data (p = 0.02) during a gradual increase of constant elements in the stimulation procedure, whereas the amplitude data were unchanged. Estimation of random contributors to the total variability in the magnetic stimulation technique was performed. Intersubject differences were the major contributor to the variability of latency data but not to variability of logarithmic amplitude data. The variance estimates of different examiners' contribution to the variability was 0.02 for latency data and 0 for amplitude data. This indicates that staff members familiar with the principles in magnetic stimulation and following a thorough verbal and written instruction in the standardized examination procedure can perform the stimulation procedure without increasing the data variability.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8897207     DOI: 10.1097/00004691-199609000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  31 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation coregistered with MRI: a comparison of a guided versus blind stimulation technique and its effect on evoked compound muscle action potentials.

Authors:  L D Gugino; J R Romero; L Aglio; D Titone; M Ramirez; A Pascual-Leone; E Grimson; N Weisenfeld; R Kikinis; M E Shenton
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Corticomotor facilitation associated with observation, imagery and imitation of hand actions: a comparative study in young and old adults.

Authors:  Guillaume Léonard; François Tremblay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Task-specific increase in corticomotor excitability during tactile discrimination.

Authors:  Sabah Master; François Tremblay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Pulse width dependence of motor threshold and input-output curve characterized with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Stefan M Goetz; Gregory G Westin; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Sequential modulation of (bottom-up) response activation and inhibition in a response conflict task: a single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Barbara Treccani; Giorgia Cona; Nadia Milanese; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-09

Review 6.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

7.  Is cognitive control automatic? New insights from transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  G Cona; B Treccani; C A Umiltà
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

8.  Enhancement of Neuromodulation with Novel Pulse Shapes Generated by Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; David L K Murphy; I Cassie Kozyrkov; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Optimal Estimation of Neural Recruitment Curves Using Fisher Information: Application to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Alavi; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Tactile-dependant corticomotor facilitation is influenced by discrimination performance in seniors.

Authors:  Sabah Master; François Tremblay
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.