OBJECTIVE: To determine bereaved parents' perceptions about participating in autopsy-related research and to elucidate their suggestions about how to improve the process. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective multicenter study was conducted to collect tumor tissue by autopsy of children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. In the study, parents completed a questionnaire after their child's death to describe the purpose for, hopes (ie, desired outcomes of), and regrets about their participation in autopsy-related research. Parents also suggested ways to improve autopsy-related discussions. A semantic content analytic method was used to analyze responses and identify themes within and across parent responses. RESULTS: Responses from 33 parents indicated that the main reasons for participating in this study were to advance medical knowledge or find a cure, a desire to help others, and choosing as their child would want. Parents hoped that participation would help others or help find a cure as well as provide closure. Providing education/anticipatory guidance and having a trusted professional sensitively broach the topic of autopsy were suggestions to improve autopsy discussions. All parents felt that study participation was the right decision, and none regretted it; 91% agreed that they would make the choice again. CONCLUSION: Because autopsy can help advance scientific understanding of the disease itself and because parents reported having no regret and even cited benefits, researchers should be encouraged to continue autopsy-related research. Parental perceptions about such studies should be evaluated in other types of pediatric diseases.
OBJECTIVE: To determine bereaved parents' perceptions about participating in autopsy-related research and to elucidate their suggestions about how to improve the process. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective multicenter study was conducted to collect tumor tissue by autopsy of children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. In the study, parents completed a questionnaire after their child's death to describe the purpose for, hopes (ie, desired outcomes of), and regrets about their participation in autopsy-related research. Parents also suggested ways to improve autopsy-related discussions. A semantic content analytic method was used to analyze responses and identify themes within and across parent responses. RESULTS: Responses from 33 parents indicated that the main reasons for participating in this study were to advance medical knowledge or find a cure, a desire to help others, and choosing as their child would want. Parents hoped that participation would help others or help find a cure as well as provide closure. Providing education/anticipatory guidance and having a trusted professional sensitively broach the topic of autopsy were suggestions to improve autopsy discussions. All parents felt that study participation was the right decision, and none regretted it; 91% agreed that they would make the choice again. CONCLUSION: Because autopsy can help advance scientific understanding of the disease itself and because parents reported having no regret and even cited benefits, researchers should be encouraged to continue autopsy-related research. Parental perceptions about such studies should be evaluated in other types of pediatric diseases.
Authors: Barbara S Paugh; Alberto Broniscer; Chunxu Qu; Claudia P Miller; Junyuan Zhang; Ruth G Tatevossian; James M Olson; J Russell Geyer; Susan N Chi; Nasjla Saba da Silva; Arzu Onar-Thomas; Justin N Baker; Amar Gajjar; David W Ellison; Suzanne J Baker Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sheri L Spunt; Sara O Vargas; Cheryl M Coffin; Stephen X Skapek; David M Parham; Joan Darling; Douglas S Hawkins; Charles Keller Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Katharine Rae Lange; Cheryl Fischer; Prajwal Rajappa; Scott Connors; David Pisapia; Jeffrey P Greenfield; Himisha Beltran; Mark Rubin; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Yasmin Khakoo Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2017-09-25
Authors: Wendy G Lichtenthal; Corinne R Sweeney; Kailey E Roberts; Geoffrey W Corner; Leigh A Donovan; Holly G Prigerson; Lori Wiener Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Cheryl Reggio; Catriona Mowbray; Mia K Waldron; Adelaide L Rood; Gabriella Sibilia; Kim Mooney-Doyle; Pamela S Hinds Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Briony F Hudson; Linda Jm Oostendorp; Bridget Candy; Victoria Vickerstaff; Louise Jones; Monica Lakhanpaul; Myra Bluebond-Langner; Paddy Stone Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Milka Bunei; Peter Muturi; Fred Otiato; Henry N Njuguna; Gideon O Emukule; Nancy A Otieno; Jeanette Dawa; Sandra S Chaves Journal: Ann Glob Health Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 2.462