UNLABELLED: The pharmacokinetics of (18)F-fluorodeoxythymidine (FLT), (18)F-FDG, (11)C-choline, and (18)F-fluoroethylcholine (FEC) in 2 hormone-independent (PC-3, DU145) and 2 hormone-dependent (CWR22, PAC120) prostate cancer xenograft mouse models were evaluated by PET and compared by immunohistochemistry. Further investigation was performed to determine whether PET can detect early changes in tumor metabolism after androgen ablation therapy through surgical castration. METHODS: PET was performed on 4 consecutive days. In addition, the CWR22 and PAC120 tumor models were surgically castrated after the baseline measurement and imaged again after castration. The tracer uptake was analyzed using time-activity curves, percentage injected dose per volume (%ID/cm(3)), and tumor-to-muscle ratio (T/M). RESULTS: Regarding the hormone-independent prostate tumor models, (18)F-FLT showed the best T/M and highest %ID/cm(3) in PC-3 (2.97 ± 0.63 %ID/cm(3)) and DU145 (2.06 ± 0.75 %ID/cm(3)) tumors. (18)F-FDG seemed to be the tracer of choice for delineation of the PC-3 tumors but not for the DU145 tumors. Using (11)C-choline (PC-3: 1.33 ± 0.29 %ID/cm(3), DU145: 1.60 ± 0.27 %ID/cm(3)) and (18)F-FEC, we did not find any significant uptake in the tumors, compared with muscle tissue. Regarding the hormone-dependent prostate tumor models, the CWR22 model showed a highly significant (P < 0.01) decrease in tumor (18)F-FDG uptake from 4.11 ± 1.29 %ID/cm(3) to 2.19 ± 1.45 %ID/cm(3) after androgen ablation therapy. However, the (18)F-FLT, (11)C-choline, or (18)F-FEC tracers did not provide sufficient uptake or reliable information about therapy response in CWR22 tumors. The PAC120 model showed a significant increase in (18)F-FLT tumor uptake (P = 0.015) after androgen ablation therapy. The accumulation of (18)F-FEC (before: 2.32 ± 1.01 %ID/cm(3), after: 1.36 ± 0.39 %ID/cm(3)) was found to be the next highest after (18)F-FDG (before: 2.45 ± 0.93 %ID/cm(3), after: 2.18 ± 0.65 %ID/cm(3)) in PAC120 tumors before castration and is better suited for monitoring therapy response. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive study in 2 hormone-dependent and 2 hormone-independent prostate tumor mouse models shows that (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG are the most appropriate tracers for delineation of PC-3, DU145 (except (18)F-FDG), and CWR22 tumors, but not for PAC120 tumors. (18)F-FEC and (11)C-choline, in particular, revealed insufficient T/M ratio in the prostate tumor models. The results may indicate that radiolabeled choline and choline derivatives compete with a high concentration of the precursor dimethylaminoethanol, resulting in reduced uptake in small-rodent tumor models, a hypothesis that is currently under investigation in our laboratory.
UNLABELLED: The pharmacokinetics of (18)F-fluorodeoxythymidine (FLT), (18)F-FDG, (11)C-choline, and (18)F-fluoroethylcholine (FEC) in 2 hormone-independent (PC-3, DU145) and 2 hormone-dependent (CWR22, PAC120) prostate cancer xenograft mouse models were evaluated by PET and compared by immunohistochemistry. Further investigation was performed to determine whether PET can detect early changes in tumor metabolism after androgen ablation therapy through surgical castration. METHODS:PET was performed on 4 consecutive days. In addition, the CWR22 and PAC120tumor models were surgically castrated after the baseline measurement and imaged again after castration. The tracer uptake was analyzed using time-activity curves, percentage injected dose per volume (%ID/cm(3)), and tumor-to-muscle ratio (T/M). RESULTS: Regarding the hormone-independent prostate tumor models, (18)F-FLT showed the best T/M and highest %ID/cm(3) in PC-3 (2.97 ± 0.63 %ID/cm(3)) and DU145 (2.06 ± 0.75 %ID/cm(3)) tumors. (18)F-FDG seemed to be the tracer of choice for delineation of the PC-3 tumors but not for the DU145 tumors. Using (11)C-choline (PC-3: 1.33 ± 0.29 %ID/cm(3), DU145: 1.60 ± 0.27 %ID/cm(3)) and (18)F-FEC, we did not find any significant uptake in the tumors, compared with muscle tissue. Regarding the hormone-dependent prostate tumor models, the CWR22 model showed a highly significant (P < 0.01) decrease in tumor (18)F-FDG uptake from 4.11 ± 1.29 %ID/cm(3) to 2.19 ± 1.45 %ID/cm(3) after androgen ablation therapy. However, the (18)F-FLT, (11)C-choline, or (18)F-FEC tracers did not provide sufficient uptake or reliable information about therapy response in CWR22 tumors. The PAC120 model showed a significant increase in (18)F-FLTtumor uptake (P = 0.015) after androgen ablation therapy. The accumulation of (18)F-FEC (before: 2.32 ± 1.01 %ID/cm(3), after: 1.36 ± 0.39 %ID/cm(3)) was found to be the next highest after (18)F-FDG (before: 2.45 ± 0.93 %ID/cm(3), after: 2.18 ± 0.65 %ID/cm(3)) in PAC120tumors before castration and is better suited for monitoring therapy response. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive study in 2 hormone-dependent and 2 hormone-independent prostate tumormouse models shows that (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG are the most appropriate tracers for delineation of PC-3, DU145 (except (18)F-FDG), and CWR22 tumors, but not for PAC120tumors. (18)F-FEC and (11)C-choline, in particular, revealed insufficient T/M ratio in the prostate tumor models. The results may indicate that radiolabeled choline and choline derivatives compete with a high concentration of the precursor dimethylaminoethanol, resulting in reduced uptake in small-rodent tumor models, a hypothesis that is currently under investigation in our laboratory.
Authors: Anna-Maria Rolle; Peter T Soboslay; Gerald Reischl; Wolfgang H Hoffmann; Bernd J Pichler; Stefan Wiehr Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Andreas Schmid; Jennifer Schmitz; Julia G Mannheim; Florian C Maier; Kerstin Fuchs; Hans F Wehrl; Bernd J Pichler Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Katherine A Zukotynski; Chun K Kim; Victor H Gerbaudo; Jon Hainer; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Philip Kantoff; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Steven Seltzer; Christopher J Sweeney Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-12-15
Authors: Stefan Wiehr; Oliver von Ahsen; Lars Röse; Andre Mueller; Julia G Mannheim; Valerie Honndorf; Damaris Kukuk; Gerald Reischl; Bernd J Pichler Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Andreas G Wibmer; Irene A Burger; Evis Sala; Hedvig Hricak; Wolfgang A Weber; Hebert Alberto Vargas Journal: Radiographics Date: 2015-11-20 Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Kimy M Emonds; Johannes V Swinnen; Evelyne Lerut; Michel Koole; Luc Mortelmans; Felix M Mottaghy Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 3.138