Literature DB >> 21604939

Developing imaging strategies for castration resistant prostate cancer.

Josef J Fox1, Michael J Morris, Steven M Larson, Heiko Schöder, Howard I Scher.   

Abstract

Recent advances in the understanding of castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) have lead to a growing number of experimental therapies, many of which are directed against the androgen-receptor (AR) signaling axis. These advances generate the need for reliable molecular imaging biomarkers to non-invasively determine efficacy, and to better guide treatment selection of these promising AR-targeted drugs. Methods. We draw on our own experience, supplemented by review of the current literature, to discuss the systematic development of imaging biomarkers for use in the context of CRPC, with a focus on bone scintigraphy, F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) and PET imaging of the AR signaling axis. Results. The roadmap to biomarker development mandates rigorous standardization and analytic validation of an assay before it can be qualified successfully for use in an appropriate clinical context. The Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 (PCWG2) criteria for "radiographic" progression by bone scintigraphy serve as a paradigm of this process. Implemented by the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (PCCTC), these consensus criteria may ultimately enable the co-development of more potent and versatile molecular imaging biomarkers. Purported to be superior to single-photon bone scanning, the added value of Na(18)F-PET for imaging of bone metastases is still uncertain. FDG-PET already plays an integral role in the management of many diseases, but requires further evaluation before being qualified in the context of CRPC. PET tracers that probe the AR signaling axis, such as (18)F-FDHT and (89)Zr-591, are now under development as pharmacodynamic markers, and as markers of efficacy, in tandem with FDG-PET. Semi-automated analysis programs for facilitating PET interpretation may serve as a valuable tool to help navigate the biomarker roadmap. Conclusions. Molecular imaging strategies, particularly those that probe the AR signaling axis, have the potential to accelerate drug development in CRPC. The development and use of analytically valid imaging biomarkers will increase the likelihood of clinical qualification, and ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21604939      PMCID: PMC3415271          DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.572914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  55 in total

1.  Clinical states in prostate cancer: toward a dynamic model of disease progression.

Authors:  H I Scher; G Heller
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 3.  Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development.

Authors:  Gary J Kelloff; John M Hoffman; Bruce Johnson; Howard I Scher; Barry A Siegel; Edward Y Cheng; Bruce D Cheson; Joyce O'shaughnessy; Kathryn Z Guyton; David A Mankoff; Lalitha Shankar; Steven M Larson; Caroline C Sigman; Richard L Schilsky; Daniel C Sullivan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Significant and sustained antitumor activity in post-docetaxel, castration-resistant prostate cancer with the CYP17 inhibitor abiraterone acetate.

Authors:  Alison H M Reid; Gerhardt Attard; Daniel C Danila; Nikhil Babu Oommen; David Olmos; Peter C Fong; L Rhoda Molife; Joanne Hunt; Christina Messiou; Christopher Parker; David Dearnaley; Joost F Swennenhuis; Leon W M M Terstappen; Gloria Lee; Thian Kheoh; Arturo Molina; Charles J Ryan; Eric Small; Howard I Scher; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Detection of bony metastases of androgen-independent prostate cancer by PET-FDG.

Authors:  S D Yeh; M Imbriaco; S M Larson; D Garza; J J Zhang; H Kalaigian; R D Finn; D Reddy; S M Horowitz; S J Goldsmith; H I Scher
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  89Zr-DFO-J591 for immunoPET of prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in vivo.

Authors:  Jason P Holland; Vadim Divilov; Neil H Bander; Peter M Smith-Jones; Steven M Larson; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Tumor Treatment Response Based on Visual and Quantitative Changes in Global Tumor Glycolysis Using PET-FDG Imaging. The Visual Response Score and the Change in Total Lesion Glycolysis.

Authors:  Steven M. Larson; Yusuf Erdi; Timothy Akhurst; Madhu Mazumdar; Homer A. Macapinlac; Ronald D. Finn; Cecille Casilla; Melissa Fazzari; Neil Srivastava; Henry W.D. Yeung; John L. Humm; Jose Guillem; Robert Downey; Martin Karpeh; Alfred E. Cohen; Robert Ginsberg
Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging       Date:  1999-05

8.  Cancer Response Criteria and Bone Metastases: RECIST 1.1, MDA and PERCIST.

Authors:  Colleen M Costelloe; Hubert H Chuang; John E Madewell; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  The flare phenomenon on radionuclide bone scan in metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  J J Pollen; K F Witztum; W L Ashburn
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Molecular determinants of resistance to antiandrogen therapy.

Authors:  Charlie D Chen; Derek S Welsbie; Chris Tran; Sung Hee Baek; Randy Chen; Robert Vessella; Michael G Rosenfeld; Charles L Sawyers
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2003-12-21       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Non-FDG PET in oncology.

Authors:  R Núñez Miller; M A Pozo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Molecular imaging of prostate cancer: PET radiotracers.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  PET Tracers Beyond FDG in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Cristina Nanni; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.446

4.  Radiographic progression-free survival as a response biomarker in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: COU-AA-302 results.

Authors:  Michael J Morris; Arturo Molina; Eric J Small; Johann S de Bono; Christopher J Logothetis; Karim Fizazi; Paul de Souza; Philip W Kantoff; Celestia S Higano; Jinhui Li; Thian Kheoh; Steven M Larson; Shannon L Matheny; Vahid Naini; Tomasz Burzykowski; Thomas W Griffin; Howard I Scher; Charles J Ryan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Management of prostate cancer patients with lymph node involvement: a rapidly evolving paradigm.

Authors:  Gilles Créhange; Chien Peter Chen; Charles C Hsu; Norbert Kased; Fergus V Coakley; John Kurhanewicz; Mack Roach
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 12.111

Review 6.  Promise and pitfalls of quantitative imaging in oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Brenda F Kurland; Elizabeth R Gerstner; James M Mountz; Lawrence H Schwartz; Christopher W Ryan; Michael M Graham; John M Buatti; Fiona M Fennessy; Edward A Eikman; Virendra Kumar; Kenneth M Forster; Richard L Wahl; Frank S Lieberman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  PET/CT in prostate cancer: non-choline radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  P Castellucci; H Jadvar
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.346

Review 8.  Targeted α-particle therapy of bone metastases in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar; David I Quinn
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.794

Review 9.  Validation and clinical utility of prostate cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Howard I Scher; Michael J Morris; Steven Larson; Glenn Heller
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  Imaging evaluation of prostate cancer with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT: utility and limitations.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.