Literature DB >> 11564321

A cortical mechanism for binding in visual working memory.

A Raffone1, G Wolters.   

Abstract

Luck and Vogel (1997) showed that the storage capacity of visual working memory is about four objects and that this capacity does not depend on the number of features making up the objects. Thus, visual working memory seems to process integrated objects rather than individual features, just as verbal working memory handles higher-order "chunks" instead of individual features or letters. In this article, we present a model based on synchronization and desynchronization of reverberatory neural assemblies, which can parsimoniously account for both the limited capacity of visual working memory, and for the temporary binding of multiple assemblies into a single pattern. A critical capacity of about three to four independent patterns showed up in our simulations, consistent with the results of Luck and Vogel. The same desynchronizing mechanism optimizing phase segregation between assemblies coding for separate features or multifeature objects poses a limit to the number of oscillatory reverberations. We show how retention of multiple features as visual chunks (feature conjunctions or objects) in terms of synchronized reverberatory assemblies may be achieved with and without long-term memory guidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11564321     DOI: 10.1162/08989290152541430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  61 in total

1.  Effects of binding in the identification of objects.

Authors:  P H de Vries
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-03-04

2.  Visual short-term memory for sequential arrays.

Authors:  Arjun Kumar; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

3.  Generalizing the dynamic field theory of spatial cognition across real and developmental time scales.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Anne R Schutte; John P Spencer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Perceptual load affects exogenous spatial orienting while working memory load does not.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Paola Finoia; Antonino Raffone; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Interference between storage and processing in working memory: Feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04

6.  What are the units of storage in visual working memory?

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; Christopher L Asplund; René Marois
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The microgenesis of action-effect binding.

Authors:  Ilona B Dutzi; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-09-23

8.  Moving to higher ground: The dynamic field theory and the dynamics of visual cognition.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; John P Spencer; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  New Ideas Psychol       Date:  2008-08

9.  Evidence for a fixed capacity limit in attending multiple locations.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Keisuke Fukuda; Lisa M May; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 10.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.