Literature DB >> 20053898

Competition in visual cortex impedes attention to multiple items.

Paige E Scalf1, Diane M Beck.   

Abstract

Traditional explanations of our limited attentional capacity focus on our ability to direct attention to multiple items. We ask whether this difficulty in simultaneously attending to multiple items stems from an inability to effectively represent multiple attended items. Although attending to one of a set of neighboring stimuli can isolate it from competitive interactions in visual cortex, no such isolation should occur if multiple competing items are attended. Indeed, we find that attention is ineffective at enhancing blood oxygen level-dependent signal in visual cortical area V4 when it is directed to three stimuli simultaneously, but only when those three stimuli compete in visual cortex. This suggests that competition may prevent attention from acting as effectively on representations of multiple items as it does on representations of a single item. In contrast to traditional explanations that posit limits in the sources of attentional control, we show that mechanisms at the sites of stimulus representation may also impose limits on our ability to attend to multiple items simultaneously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20053898      PMCID: PMC3164532          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4207-09.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  43 in total

1.  The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks.

Authors:  D H Weissman; M T Banich
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Practice-related effects demonstrate complementary roles of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in attentional control.

Authors:  M P Milham; M T Banich; E D Claus; N J Cohen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Flexible, capacity-limited activity of posterior parietal cortex in perceptual as well as visual short-term memory tasks.

Authors:  Daniel J Mitchell; Rhodri Cusack
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Training-induced functional activation changes in dual-task processing: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Kirk I Erickson; Stanley J Colcombe; Ruchika Wadhwa; Louis Bherer; Matthew S Peterson; Paige E Scalf; Jennifer S Kim; Maritza Alvarado; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Stimulus similarity modulates competitive interactions in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Diane M Beck; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; J Duncan; E K Miller; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system.

Authors:  B Fischl; M I Sereno; A M Dale
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  C Blakemore; E A Tobin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  18 in total

1.  Anatomical constraints on attention: hemifield independence is a signature of multifocal spatial selection.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Jonathan Gill; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Attention does more than modulate suppressive interactions: attending to multiple items.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Chandramalika Basak; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural dynamics of object-based multifocal visual spatial attention and priming: object cueing, useful-field-of-view, and crowding.

Authors:  Nicholas C Foley; Stephen Grossberg; Ennio Mingolla
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Neural substrates of visual masking by object substitution in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Junghee Lee; Mark S Cohen; Stephen A Engel; David Glahn; Keith H Nuechterlein; Jonathan K Wynn; Michael F Green
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Interactions of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Stephanie McMains; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Evidence for unlimited capacity processing of simple features in visual cortex.

Authors:  Alex L White; Erik Runeson; John Palmer; Zachary R Ernst; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  The effects of stimulus-driven competition and task set on involuntary attention.

Authors:  Suk Won Han; René Marois
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Event-related potentials dissociate effects of salience and space in biased competition for visual representation.

Authors:  Matthew R Hilimire; Jeffrey R W Mounts; Nathan A Parks; Paul M Corballis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Competition explains limited attention and perceptual resources: implications for perceptual load and dilution theories.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Ana Torralbo; Evelina Tapia; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.