Literature DB >> 24194577

Explicit semantic stimulus categorization interferes with implicit emotion processing.

Harald T Schupp1, Ralf Schmälzle2, Tobias Flaisch2.   

Abstract

Previous functional magnetic resonance imaging and event-related brain potential studies revealed that performing a cognitive task may suppress the preferential processing of emotional stimuli. However, these studies utilized simple and artificial tasks (i.e. letter, shape or orientation discrimination tasks), unfamiliar to the participants. The present event-related potential study examined the emotion-attention interaction in the context of a comparably more natural scene categorization task. Deciding whether a natural scene contains an animal or not is a familiar and meaningful task to the participants and presumed to require little attentional resources. The task images were presented centrally and were overlaid upon emotional or neutral background pictures. Thus, implicit emotion and explicit semantic categorization may compete for processing resources in neural regions implicated in object recognition. Additionally, participants passively viewed the same stimulus materials without the demand to categorize task images. Significant interactions between task condition and emotional picture valence were observed for the occipital negativity and late positive potential. In the passive viewing condition, emotional background images elicited an increased occipital negativity followed by an increased late positive potential. In contrast, during the animal-/non-animal-categorization task, emotional modulation effects were replaced by strong target categorization effects. These results suggest that explicit semantic categorization interferes with implicit emotion processing when both processes compete for shared resources.
© The Author (2013). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EPN; ERP; LPP; attention; competition; emotion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24194577      PMCID: PMC4221216          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nst171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  49 in total

1.  Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe; Simon J Thorpe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Attentional control of the processing of neural and emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Luiz Pessoa; Sabine Kastner; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-12

3.  Attentional bias to briefly presented emotional distractors follows a slow time course in visual cortex.

Authors:  Matthias M Müller; Søren K Andersen; Catherine Hindi Attar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The categorization of natural scenes: brain attention networks revealed by dense sensor ERPs.

Authors:  Maurizio Codispoti; Vera Ferrari; Markus Junghöfer; Harald T Schupp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Eye fixations and memory for emotional events.

Authors:  S A Christianson; E F Loftus; H Hoffman; G R Loftus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Ultra-rapid categorization requires visual attention: Scenes with multiple foreground objects.

Authors:  Sarah Walker; Paul Stafford; Greg Davis
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  Mechanisms of top-down attention.

Authors:  Farhan Baluch; Laurent Itti
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Rapid categorization of achromatic natural scenes: how robust at very low contrasts?

Authors:  Marc J-M Macé; Simon J Thorpe; Michèle Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 9.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise.

Authors:  Joshua New; Leda Cosmides; John Tooby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Neurophysiology of the Cerebellum in Emotion.

Authors:  Michael Adamaszek; Kenneth C Kirkby
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Using ERPs to investigate valence processing in the affect misattribution procedure.

Authors:  Curtis D Von Gunten; Bruce D Bartholow; Laura D Scherer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  The Neural Basis of Herding Decisions in Enterprise Clustering: An Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Wuke Zhang; Danping Yang; Jia Jin; Liuting Diao; Qingguo Ma
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Implicit and Explicit Attention to Pictures and Words: An fMRI-Study of Concurrent Emotional Stimulus Processing.

Authors:  Tobias Flaisch; Martin Imhof; Ralf Schmälzle; Klaus-Ulrich Wentz; Bernd Ibach; Harald T Schupp
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-12-18

5.  Emotional Picture Perception: Repetition Effects in Free-Viewing and during an Explicit Categorization Task.

Authors:  Serena Mastria; Vera Ferrari; Maurizio Codispoti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.