Literature DB >> 23421443

Interference between conversation and a concurrent visuomotor task.

Timothy W Boiteau1, Patrick S Malone1, Sara A Peters2, Amit Almor1.   

Abstract

We report 2 experiments during which participants conversed with either a confederate (Experiment 1) or a close friend (Experiment 2) while tracking a moving target on a computer screen. In both experiments, talking led to worse performance on the tracking task than listening. We attribute this finding to the increased cognitive demands of speech planning and monitoring. Growth curve analyses of task performance during the beginning and end of conversation segments revealed dynamical changes in the impact of conversation on visuomotor task performance, with increasing impact during the beginning of speaking segments and decreasing impact during the beginning of listening segments. At the end of speaking and listening segments, this pattern reversed. These changes became more pronounced with increased difficulty of the task. Together, these results show that the planning and monitoring aspects of conversation require the majority of the attentional resources that are also used for nonlinguistic visuomotor tasks. The fact that similar results were obtained when conversing with both a confederate and a friend indicates that our findings apply to a wide range of conversational situations. This is the first study to show the fine-grained time course of the shifting attentional demands of conversation on a concurrently performed visuomotor task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23421443      PMCID: PMC3720820          DOI: 10.1037/a0031858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  41 in total

1.  Driven to distraction: dual-Task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone.

Authors:  D L Strayer; W A Johnston
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

Review 2.  Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models.

Authors:  A Postma
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-11-16

3.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving.

Authors:  David L Strayer; Frank A Drews; William A Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2003-03

Review 4.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?

Authors:  Jonathan Levy; Harold Pashler; Erwin Boer
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

6.  Analysis of pausing behavior in spontaneous speech using real-time magnetic resonance imaging of articulation.

Authors:  Vikram Ramanarayanan; Erik Bresch; Dani Byrd; Louis Goldstein; Shrikanth S Narayanan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Constraints on sentence comprehension.

Authors:  E Gibson; N J Pearlmutter
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Rules of engagement: incomplete and complete pronoun resolution.

Authors:  Jessica Love; Gail McKoon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Aging of attention: does the ability to divide decline?

Authors:  T A Salthouse; N M Fristoe; T T Lineweaver; V E Coon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-01

10.  A decrease in brain activation associated with driving when listening to someone speak.

Authors:  Marcel Adam Just; Timothy A Keller; Jacquelyn Cynkar
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  11 in total

1.  The use of content and timing to predict turn transitions.

Authors:  Simon Garrod; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-11

2.  Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language.

Authors:  Stephen C Levinson; Francisco Torreira
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-12

3.  Moving to Capture Children's Attention: Developing a Methodology for Measuring Visuomotor Attention.

Authors:  Liam J B Hill; Rachel O Coats; Faisal Mushtaq; Justin H G Williams; Lorna S Aucott; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Timing of Utterance Planning in Task-Oriented Dialogue: Evidence from a Novel List-Completion Paradigm.

Authors:  Mathias Barthel; Sebastian Sauppe; Stephen C Levinson; Antje S Meyer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-01

5.  Working Together: Contributions of Corpus Analyses and Experimental Psycholinguistics to Understanding Conversation.

Authors:  Antje S Meyer; Phillip M Alday; Caitlin Decuyper; Birgit Knudsen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-12

6.  Listeners are better at predicting speakers similar to themselves.

Authors:  Lauren V Hadley; Nina K Fisher; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2020-06-07

7.  Neural signatures of response planning occur midway through an incoming question in conversation.

Authors:  Sara Bögels; Lilla Magyari; Stephen C Levinson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Semantic Relations Cause Interference in Spoken Language Comprehension When Using Repeated Definite References, Not Pronouns.

Authors:  Sara A Peters; Timothy W Boiteau; Amit Almor
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-01

9.  Verbal Working Memory as Emergent from Language Comprehension and Production.

Authors:  Steven C Schwering; Maryellen C MacDonald
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Distinct Neural Processes for Memorizing Form and Meaning Within Sentences.

Authors:  Matteo Mascelloni; Roberto Zamparelli; Francesco Vespignani; Thomas Gruber; Jutta L Mueller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.