Literature DB >> 11760132

Driven to distraction: dual-Task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone.

D L Strayer1, W A Johnston.   

Abstract

Dual-task studies assessed the effects of cellular-phone conversations on performance of a simulated driving task. Performance was not disrupted by listening to radio broadcasts or listening to a book on tape. Nor was it disrupted by a continuous shadowing task using a handheld phone, ruling out, in this case, dual-task interpretations associated with holding the phone, listening, or speaking, However significant interference was observed in a word-generation variant of the shadowing task, and this deficit increased with the difficulty of driving. Moreover unconstrained conversations using either a handheld or a hands-free cell phone resulted in a twofold increase in the failure to detect simulated traffic signals and slower reactions to those signals that were detected. We suggest that cellular-phone use disrupts performance by diverting attention to an engaging cognitive context other than the one immediately associated with driving.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11760132     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  78 in total

1.  Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration.

Authors:  Kelvin F H Lui; Alan C-N Wong
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

2.  Supertaskers: Profiles in extraordinary multitasking ability.

Authors:  Jason M Watson; David L Strayer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

Review 3.  Vision and driving.

Authors:  Cynthia Owsley; Gerald McGwin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Are Driving Simulators Effective Tools for Evaluating Novice Drivers' Hazard Anticipation, Speed Management, and Attention Maintenance Skills.

Authors:  Elsa Chan; Anuj K Pradhan; Alexander Pollatsek; Michael A Knodler; Donald L Fisher
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2010-09-01

5.  Driving after pediatric traumatic brain injury: Impact of distraction and executive functioning.

Authors:  Megan E Narad; Patrick Nalepka; Aimee E Miley; Dean W Beebe; Brad G Kurowski; Shari L Wade
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2020-06-11

6.  Attentional disregulation: a benefit for implicit memory.

Authors:  Gillian Rowe; Steven Valderrama; Lynn Hasher; Agatha Lenartowicz
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-12

7.  Active prompting to decrease cell phone use and increase seat belt use while driving.

Authors:  Michael Clayton; Bridgett Helms; Cathy Simpson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2006

8.  Conversation effects on neural mechanisms underlying reaction time to visual events while viewing a driving scene using MEG.

Authors:  Susan M Bowyer; Li Hsieh; John E Moran; Richard A Young; Arun Manoharan; Chia-cheng Jason Liao; Kiran Malladi; Ya-Ju Yu; Yow-Ren Chiang; Norman Tepley
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Interference between conversation and a concurrent visuomotor task.

Authors:  Timothy W Boiteau; Patrick S Malone; Sara A Peters; Amit Almor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-02-18

10.  The rapid distraction of attentional resources toward the source of incongruent stimulus input during multisensory conflict.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Alexandra E Todisco; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.