Literature DB >> 2341822

Absence of anticipatory contrast in rats trained on multiple schedules.

B A Williams1.   

Abstract

Rats were trained on three- and four-component multiple schedules in which two of the components were correlated with identical reinforcement schedules that remained unchanged throughout training. These target components differed in terms of whether their respective following schedules were either higher or lower in value. Unlike corresponding experiments previously reported with pigeons, higher response rates occurred in the target component followed by a higher valued schedule than in the target component followed by the lower valued schedule. Overall contrast effects occurred independently of these sequential effects, but were inconsistent across subjects. The results suggest that the effects of a following schedule of reinforcement are opposite for pigeons and rats, and that one reason previous studies have often failed to show contrast effects with rats is that the effects of the following schedule in rats are in competition with contrast dynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2341822      PMCID: PMC1322965          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  RATE-CHANGE EFFECTS WITH EQUAL POTENTIAL REINFORCEMENTS DURING THE "WARNING" STIMULUS.

Authors:  S S PLISKOFF
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavioral contrast in one component of a multiple schedule as a function of the reinforcement conditions operating in the following component.

Authors:  R N Wilton; R A Gay
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavioral contrast as a function of the temporal location of reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The following schedule of reinforcement as a fundamental determinant of steady state contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Discrimination training and stimulus compounding: consideration of non-reinforcement and response differentiation consequences of S.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Behavioral contrast without response-rate reduction.

Authors:  M S Halliday; R A Boakes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Positive and negative behavioral contrast in the rat.

Authors:  A Gutman; J R Sutterer; F R Brush
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Contrast, component duration, and the following schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1979-10

9.  Conditioned acceleration and conditioned suppression in pigeons.

Authors:  H Leitenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Positive contrast in the rat: a test of the additivity theory.

Authors:  G B Nallan; D F McCoy
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1979-09
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral contrast redux.

Authors:  Ben A Williams
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

2.  Contrast and reallocation of extraneous reinforcers between multiple-schedule components.

Authors:  A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Local contrast in behavior allocation during multiple-schedule components.

Authors:  A P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Contrast and undermatching with regular or irregular alternation of components.

Authors:  A P McLean; C F Morritt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.