Literature DB >> 14055953

RATE-CHANGE EFFECTS WITH EQUAL POTENTIAL REINFORCEMENTS DURING THE "WARNING" STIMULUS.

S S PLISKOFF.   

Abstract

Two pre-schedule-change stimuli were superimposed on the same VI baseline and were thereby equated with respect to reinforcement potential. One such stimulus preceded a transition to an extinction schedule or a VI schedule of lower reinforcement frequency while the other preceded a transition to a VI schedule of higher reinforcement frequency. It was found that response rate during the warning stimulus was greater preceding the transition to the lower reinforcement frequency than it was preceding the transition to the higher reinforcement frequency. That difference was often evidenced by an absolute increase and decrease in rate, in conformity with previous findings on the topic. The present experiment extends previous findings in several ways, including the presentation of quantitative estimates of the effects.

Keywords:  BIRDS; COLOR; EXPERIMENTAL LAB STUDY; LIGHT; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY)

Mesh:

Year:  1963        PMID: 14055953      PMCID: PMC1404437          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  2 in total

1.  Suppression of a performance under differential reinforcement of low rates by a pre-time-out stimulus.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Rate-change effects during a pre-schedule-change stimulus.

Authors:  S PLISKOFF
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total
  20 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral contrast redux.

Authors:  Ben A Williams
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-02

2.  Behavioral contrast: Pavlovian effects and anticipatory contrast.

Authors:  A D Hassin-Herman; N S Hemmes; B L Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Elicited responding to signals for reinforcement: the effects of overall versus local changes in reinforcement probability.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Behavioral contrast in one component of a multiple schedule as a function of the reinforcement conditions operating in the following component.

Authors:  R N Wilton; R A Gay
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Positive conditioned suppression: conditioned suppression using positive reinforcers as the unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  N H Azrin; D F Hake
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A re-examination of local contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  S L Buck; B Rothstein; B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Does contingent reinforcement strengthen operant behavior?

Authors:  J A Nevin; L D Smith; J Roberts
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Control of responding during stimuli that precede transitions in reinforcement frequency.

Authors:  M G Ortega; H Marcucella
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.