Literature DB >> 23417238

Comparing adaptive procedures for estimating the psychometric function for an auditory gap detection task.

Yi Shen1.   

Abstract

A subject's sensitivity to a stimulus variation can be studied by estimating the psychometric function. Generally speaking, three parameters of the psychometric function are of interest: the performance threshold, the slope of the function, and the rate at which attention lapses occur. In the present study, three psychophysical procedures were used to estimate the three-parameter psychometric function for an auditory gap detection task. These were an up-down staircase (up-down) procedure, an entropy-based Bayesian (entropy) procedure, and an updated maximum-likelihood (UML) procedure. Data collected from four young, normal-hearing listeners showed that while all three procedures provided similar estimates of the threshold parameter, the up-down procedure performed slightly better in estimating the slope and lapse rate for 200 trials of data collection. When the lapse rate was increased by mixing in random responses for the three adaptive procedures, the larger lapse rate was especially detrimental to the efficiency of the up-down procedure, and the UML procedure provided better estimates of the threshold and slope than did the other two procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23417238      PMCID: PMC3634902          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0438-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  16 in total

1.  Slope bias of psychometric functions derived from adaptive data.

Authors:  C Kaernbach
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

2.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

3.  Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests.

Authors:  Thomas Brand; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures.

Authors:  D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A maximum-likelihood procedure for estimating psychometric functions: thresholds, slopes, and lapses of attention.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Detection of partially filled gaps in noise and the temporal modulation transfer function.

Authors:  T G Forrest; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Gap detection as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level.

Authors:  M J Shailer; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.

Authors:  A B Watson; D G Pelli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

10.  Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  P J Fitzgibbons; F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  10 in total

1.  Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Nicole K Manzano; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the auditory filter.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A MATLAB toolbox for the efficient estimation of the psychometric function using the updated maximum-likelihood adaptive procedure.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Wei Dai; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-03

4.  Visual acuity measured with luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated noise letter stimuli in young adults and adults above 50 years old.

Authors:  Pui Juan Woi; Sharanjeet Kaur; Sarah J Waugh; Mohd Izzuddin Hairol
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-08-12

5.  Metacognitive Accuracy Improves With the Perceptual Learning of a Low- but Not High-Level Face Property.

Authors:  Benjamin Chen; Matthew Mundy; Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-07-24

6.  Similar EEG Activity Patterns During Experimentally-Induced Auditory Illusions and Veridical Perceptions.

Authors:  Maryam Faramarzi; Florian H Kasten; Gamze Altaş; André Aleman; Branislava Ćurčić-Blake; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  The Effects of Psychophysical Methods on Spectral and Spatial TOJ Thresholds.

Authors:  Leah Fostick; Harvey Babkoff
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  FaReT: A free and open-source toolkit of three-dimensional models and software to study face perception.

Authors:  Jason Hays; Claudia Wong; Fabian A Soto
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-12

9.  An Evaluation of the Agreement Between a Computerized Stereoscopic Game Test and the TNO Stereoacuity Test.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Portela-Camino; Santiago Martín-González; Javier Ruiz-Alcocer; Igor Illarramendi-Mendicute; Rafaela Garrido-Mercado
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2021-07-05

10.  Noisy Galvanic Stimulation Improves Roll-Tilt Vestibular Perception in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Aram Keywan; Max Wuehr; Cauchy Pradhan; Klaus Jahn
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.003

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.