Literature DB >> 2373801

Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures.

D M Green1.   

Abstract

In adaptive psychophysical procedures, the stimulus should be presented at a relatively high level rather than near the middle of the psychometric function, which is often defined as the "threshold" value. For some psychometric functions, the optimal stimulus placement level produces 84% to 94% correct responses in a two-alternative forced-choice task. This result is disquieting because the popular two-down one-up rule tracks a relatively low percentage of correct responses, 70.7%. Computer simulations and a variety of psychometric functions were used to confirm the validity of this analysis. These simulations also demonstrate that the precise form of the psychometric function is not critical in achieving the high efficiencies. Finally, data from human listeners indicate that the standard deviation of threshold estimates is indeed larger when the stimulus presented on each trial is at a stimulus level corresponding to 70.7% rather than 94% correct responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2373801     DOI: 10.1121/1.399058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  32 in total

1.  Learning problems, delayed development, and puberty.

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Steven G Zecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Osteoclasts: New Insights.

Authors:  Xu Feng; Steven L Teitelbaum
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 13.567

3.  Estimation of psychometric functions from adaptive tracking procedures.

Authors:  M R Leek; T E Hanna; L Marshall
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

4.  Loudness adaptation in acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Qing Tang; Sheng Liu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-01-20

5.  Learning, worsening, and generalization in response to auditory perceptual training during adolescence.

Authors:  Julia Jones Huyck; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the auditory filter.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A maximum-likelihood procedure for estimating psychometric functions: thresholds, slopes, and lapses of attention.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Extracting thresholds from noisy psychophysical data.

Authors:  W H Swanson; E E Birch
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

9.  Optimal Estimation of Neural Recruitment Curves Using Fisher Information: Application to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Alavi; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Comparisons of memory for nonverbal auditory and visual sequential stimuli.

Authors:  D J McFarland; A T Cacace
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1995
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.