Literature DB >> 2341672

Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release.

B C Moore1, B R Glasberg, G P Schooneveldt.   

Abstract

These experiments on across-channel masking (ACM) and comodulation masking release (CMR) were designed to extend the work of Grose and Hall [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 1276-1284 (1989)] on CMR. They investigated the effect of the temporal position of a brief 700-Hz signal relative to the modulation cycle of a 700-Hz masker 100% sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) at a 10-Hz rate, which was either presented alone (reference masker) or formed part of a masker consisting of the 3rd to 11th harmonics of a 100-Hz fundamental. In the harmonic maskers, each harmonic was either SAM with the same 10-Hz modulator phase (comodulated masker) or with a shift in modulator phase of 90 degrees for each successive harmonic (phase-incoherent masker). When the signal was presented at the dips of the envelope of the 700-Hz component, the comodulated masker gave lower thresholds than the reference masker, while the phase-incoherent masker gave higher thresholds, i.e., a CMR was observed. No CMR was found when the signal was presented at the peaks of the envelope. In experiment 1, we replicated the experiment of Grose and Hall, but with an additional condition in which the 600- and 800-Hz components were removed from the masker, in order to investigate the role of within-channel masking effects. The results were similar to those of Grose and Hall. In experiment 2, the signal was added at the peaks of the envelope of the 700-Hz component, but in antiphase to the carrier of that component and at a level chosen to transform the peaks into dips. No CMR was found. Rather, performance was worse for both the comodulated and phase-incoherent maskers than for the reference masker. This was true even when the flanking components in the maskers were all remote in frequency from 700 Hz. In experiment 3, the masker components were all 50% SAM and the signal was added in antiphase at a dip of the envelope of the 700-Hz component, thus making the dip deeper. Performance was worse for the phase-incoherent than for the reference masker and was worse still for the comodulated masker. The results of all three experiments indicate strong ACM effects. CMR was found only when the signal was placed in the dips of the masker envelope and when it produced an increase in level relative to that in adjacent bands.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2341672     DOI: 10.1121/1.399416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Physiological correlates of comodulation masking release in the mammalian ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  D Pressnitzer; R Meddis; R Delahaye; I M Winter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The psychophysics and physiology of comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Jesko L Verhey; Daniel Pressnitzer; Ian M Winter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Extracting binaural information from simultaneous targets and distractors: effects of amplitude modulation and asynchronous envelopes.

Authors:  Mark A Stellmack; Andrew J Byrne; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spectral profile cues in comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Detection of spectrally complex signals in comodulated maskers: effect of temporal fringe.

Authors:  John H Grose; Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; Debora R Hatch
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of masker level uncertainty on intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spectral integration under conditions of comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Pitch discrimination interference: the role of ear of entry and of octave similarity.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Ervin R Hafter; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Across-frequency envelope correlation discrimination and masked signal detection.

Authors:  John H Grose; Emily Buss; Heather L Porter; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Features of across-frequency envelope coherence critical for comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Emily Buss; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.