Literature DB >> 23927119

Across-frequency envelope correlation discrimination and masked signal detection.

John H Grose1, Emily Buss, Heather L Porter, Joseph W Hall.   

Abstract

This study compared the dependence of comodulation masking release (CMR) and monaural envelope correlation perception (MECP) on the degree of envelope correlation for the same narrowband noise stimuli. Envelope correlation across noise bands was systematically varied by mixing independent bands with a base set of comodulated bands. The magnitude of CMR fell monotonically with reductions in envelope correlation, and CMR varied over a range of envelope correlations that were not discriminable from each other in the MECP paradigm. For complexes of 100-Hz-wide noise bands, discrimination thresholds in the MECP task were similar whether the standard was a comodulated set of noise bands or a completely independent set of noise bands. This was not the case for 25-Hz-wide noise bands. Although the data demonstrate that CMR and MECP exhibit different dependencies on the degree of envelope correlation, some commonality across the two phenomena was observed. Specifically, for 25-Hz-wide bands of noise, there was a robust relationship between individual listeners' sensitivity to decorrelation from an otherwise comodulated set of noise bands and the magnitude of CMR measured for those same comodulated noise bands.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23927119      PMCID: PMC3745494          DOI: 10.1121/1.4812256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Monaural envelope correlation perception, revisited: effects of bandwidth, frequency separation, duration, and relative level of the noise bands.

Authors:  B C Moore; D S Emmerich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of flanking band proximity, number, and modulation pattern on comodulation masking release.

Authors:  J W Hall; J H Grose; M P Haggard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masking release for sweeping masker components with correlated envelopes.

Authors:  Jesko L Verhey; Hendrike Klein-Hennig; Bastian Epp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-28

4.  Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg; G P Schooneveldt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band.

Authors:  G P Schooneveldt; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration.

Authors:  G P Schooneveldt; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Comodulation masking release: effects of varying the level, duration, and time delay of the cue band.

Authors:  D McFadden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Monaural envelope correlation perception.

Authors:  V M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Comodulation masking release: evidence for multiple cues.

Authors:  J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cognitive performance and long-latency auditory evoked potentials: a study on aging.

Authors:  Maria de Fátima Ferreira de Oliveira; Pedro de Lemos Menezes; Aline Tenório Lins Carnaúba; Liliane Desgualdo Pereira; Kelly Cristina Lira de Andrade; Ana Claudia Figueiredo Frizzo; Ilka do Amaral Soares
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.365

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.