Literature DB >> 23415937

Transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment of refractory childhood focal epilepsy.

Narong Auvichayapat1, Alexander Rotenberg, Roman Gersner, Sudarat Ngodklang, Somsak Tiamkao, Wichittra Tassaneeyakul, Paradee Auvichayapat.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation method for suppressing regional cortical excitability. We examine the safety and antiepileptic efficacy of cathodal tDCS in children with refractory focal epilepsy. Although a prior cathodal tDCS trial in adults with epilepsy revealed EEG improvement, neither the antiepileptic potential nor the safety and tolerability of tDCS has been tested in children.
METHOD: The study consisted of three phases: 1) a 4-week pre-treatment monitoring period with vital sign measures, EEG, seizure diary, and baseline quality of life (QOL) questionnaire; 2) a single treatment with 1 mA cathodal tDCS for 20 min with cathode positioned over the seizure focus and anode on the contralateral shoulder; 3) follow-ups immediately after stimulation, and at 24, 48 h, and 4 weeks after tDCS with continued seizure diary and epileptic discharge counts on EEG; the QOL questionnaire was also repeated 4 weeks after stimulation. Patients were randomized to receive either single session active or sham tDCS 1 mA, 20 min.
RESULTS: Thirty six children (6-15 years) with focal epilepsy were enrolled, 27 in active and 9 in sham group. All patients tolerated tDCS well. No serious adverse events occurred. Active tDCS treatment was associated with significant reductions in epileptic discharge frequency immediately and 24 and 48 h after tDCS. Four weeks after treatment, a small (clinically negligible but statistically significant) decrease in seizure frequency was also detected.
CONCLUSION: A single session of cathodal tDCS improves epileptic EEG abnormalities for 48 h and is well-tolerated in children.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical neurophysiology; Focal seizures; Noninvasive brain stimulation; Partial seizures; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23415937     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  47 in total

Review 1.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 2.  Safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Luciana Santos; Mark D Peterson; Margaret Ehinger
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Vaughn Bryant; Daniela Sacchetti; Felix Gervits; Roy Hamilton
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ulrich Palm; Felix M Segmiller; Ann Natascha Epple; Franz-Joseph Freisleder; Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Gerd Schulte-Körne; Frank Padberg
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Pain reduction in myofascial pain syndrome by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with standard treatment: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Piyaraid Sakrajai; Taweesak Janyacharoen; Mark P Jensen; Kittisak Sawanyawisuth; Narong Auvichayapat; Orathai Tunkamnerdthai; Keattichai Keeratitanont; Paradee Auvichayapat
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 6.  Transcranial Magnetic and Direct Current Stimulation in Children.

Authors:  Mustafa Q Hameed; Sameer C Dhamne; Roman Gersner; Harper L Kaye; Lindsay M Oberman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.081

7.  Direct-current Stimulation and Multi-electrode Array Recording of Seizure-like Activity in Mice Brain Slice Preparation.

Authors:  Hsiang-Chin Lu; Wei-Jen Chang; Wei-Pang Chang; Bai-Chuang Shyu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  NON-INVASIVE BRAIN STIMULATION IN CHILDREN: APPLICATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS.

Authors:  Thilinie Rajapakse; Adam Kirton
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.757

Review 9.  Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Pnina Grossman; Chris Thomas; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Jimmy Jiang; Tatheer Adnan; Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Greg Kronberg; Dennis Truong; Paulo Boggio; André R Brunoni; Leigh Charvet; Felipe Fregni; Brita Fritsch; Bernadette Gillick; Roy H Hamilton; Benjamin M Hampstead; Ryan Jankord; Adam Kirton; Helena Knotkova; David Liebetanz; Anli Liu; Colleen Loo; Michael A Nitsche; Janine Reis; Jessica D Richardson; Alexander Rotenberg; Peter E Turkeltaub; Adam J Woods
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Direct current stimulation induces mGluR5-dependent neocortical plasticity.

Authors:  Yan Sun; Jonathan O Lipton; Lara M Boyle; Joseph R Madsen; Marti C Goldenberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Mustafa Sahin; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 10.422

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.