Literature DB >> 27315032

Direct current stimulation induces mGluR5-dependent neocortical plasticity.

Yan Sun1,2,3, Jonathan O Lipton1,4, Lara M Boyle1, Joseph R Madsen5, Marti C Goldenberg1, Alvaro Pascual-Leone6, Mustafa Sahin1, Alexander Rotenberg1,2,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To obtain insights into mechanisms mediating changes in cortical excitability induced by cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
METHODS: Neocortical slices were exposed to direct current stimulation (DCS) delivered through Ag/AgCl electrodes over a range of current orientations, magnitudes, and durations. DCS-induced cortical plasticity and its receptor dependency were measured as the change in layer II/III field excitatory postsynaptic potentials by a multielectrode array, both with and without neurotransmitter receptor blockers or allosteric modulators. In vivo, tDCS was delivered to intact mice scalp via surface electrodes. Molecular consequences of DCS in vitro or tDCS in vivo were tested by immunoblot of protein extracted from stimulated slices or the neocortex harvested from stimulated intact mice.
RESULTS: Cathodal DCS in vitro induces a long-term depression (DCS-LTD) of excitatory synaptic strength in both human and mouse neocortical slices. DCS-LTD is abolished with an mGluR5 negative allosteric modulator, mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, and inhibitor of protein synthesis. However, DCS-LTD persists despite either γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor or N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor inhibition. An mGluR5-positive allosteric modulator, in contrast, transformed transient synaptic depression resultant from brief DCS application into durable DCS-LTD.
INTERPRETATION: We identify a novel molecular pathway by which tDCS modulates cortical excitability, and indicate a capacity for synergistic interaction between tDCS and pharmacologic mGluR5 facilitation. The findings support exploration of cathodal tDCS as a treatment of neurologic conditions characterized by aberrant regional cortical excitability referable to mGluR5-mTOR signaling. Ann Neurol 2016;80:233-246.
© 2016 American Neurological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27315032      PMCID: PMC8270112          DOI: 10.1002/ana.24708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  49 in total

1.  Activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt-mammalian target of rapamycin signaling pathway is required for metabotropic glutamate receptor-dependent long-term depression.

Authors:  Lingfei Hou; Eric Klann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  NMDA-induced potentiation of mGluR5 is mediated by activation of protein phosphatase 2B/calcineurin.

Authors:  Sudar Alagarsamy; Julie Saugstad; Lee Warren; Isabelle M Mansuy; Robert W Gereau; P Jeffrey Conn
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 3.  Ribosomal S6 kinase signaling and the control of translation.

Authors:  A Dufner; G Thomas
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1999-11-25       Impact factor: 3.905

4.  Different forms of synaptic plasticity in somatosensory and motor areas of the neocortex.

Authors:  M A Castro-Alamancos; J P Donoghue; B W Connors
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Brain stimulation in the treatment of chronic neuropathic and non-cancerous pain.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Andre Machado
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Katia Monte-Silva; Min-Fang Kuo; Silvia Hessenthaler; Shane Fresnoza; David Liebetanz; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Homer1a-dependent crosstalk between NMDA and metabotropic glutamate receptors in mouse neurons.

Authors:  Federica Bertaso; Gautier Roussignol; Paul Worley; Joël Bockaert; Laurent Fagni; Fabrice Ango
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Treatment of depression with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): a review.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Paulo S Boggio; Felipe Fregni; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 5.330

9.  mGluR-dependent long-term depression is associated with increased phosphorylation of S6 and synthesis of elongation factor 1A but remains expressed in S6K-deficient mice.

Authors:  Marcia D Antion; Lingfei Hou; Helen Wong; Charles A Hoeffer; Eric Klann
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Importance of Shank3 protein in regulating metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) expression and signaling at synapses.

Authors:  Chiara Verpelli; Elena Dvoretskova; Cinzia Vicidomini; Francesca Rossi; Michela Chiappalone; Michael Schoen; Bruno Di Stefano; Renato Mantegazza; Vania Broccoli; Tobias M Böckers; Alexander Dityatev; Carlo Sala
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Allosteric Modulation of GPCRs: New Insights and Potential Utility for Treatment of Schizophrenia and Other CNS Disorders.

Authors:  Daniel J Foster; P Jeffrey Conn
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Transcranial Electrical Brain Stimulation in Alert Rodents.

Authors:  Brita Fritsch; Anne-Kathrin Gellner; Janine Reis
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 3.  Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes.

Authors:  Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Paola Marangolo; Benjamin M Hampstead; Sven Bestmann; Elisabeth Galletta; Helena Knotkova; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 4.  Transcranial Magnetic and Direct Current Stimulation in Children.

Authors:  Mustafa Q Hameed; Sameer C Dhamne; Roman Gersner; Harper L Kaye; Lindsay M Oberman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 5.  Using transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) to understand cognitive processing.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Josh D Cosman; Keisuke Fukuda; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Exploring new transcranial electrical stimulation strategies to modulate brain function in animal models.

Authors:  Carlos A Sánchez-León; Álvaro Sánchez-López; Claudia Ammann; Isabel Cordones; Alejandro Carretero-Guillén; Javier Márquez-Ruiz
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-09-12

7.  Effects of direct current stimulation on synaptic plasticity in a single neuron.

Authors:  Forouzan Farahani; Greg Kronberg; Mohamad FallahRad; Hysell V Oviedo; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Using animal models to improve the design and application of transcranial electrical stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Carlos A Sánchez-León; Claudia Ammann; Javier F Medina; Javier Márquez-Ruiz
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-04-25

Review 9.  From adults to pediatrics: A review noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to facilitate recovery from brain injury.

Authors:  Georgia H O'Leary; Dorothea D Jenkins; Patricia Coker-Bolt; Mark S George; Steve Kautz; Marom Bikson; Bernadette T Gillick; Bashar W Badran
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.624

Review 10.  Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMH-sponsored workshop.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Andre R Brunoni; Leigh E Charvet; Vincent P Clark; Leonardo G Cohen; Zhi-De Deng; Jacek Dmochowski; Dylan J Edwards; Flavio Frohlich; Emily S Kappenman; Kelvin O Lim; Colleen Loo; Antonio Mantovani; David P McMullen; Lucas C Parra; Michele Pearson; Jessica D Richardson; Judith M Rumsey; Pejman Sehatpour; David Sommers; Gozde Unal; Eric M Wassermann; Adam J Woods; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.