Literature DB >> 23413000

Verifying properties of concepts spontaneously requires sharing resources with same-modality percept.

Nicolas Vermeulen1, Betty Chang, Olivier Corneille, Gordy Pleyers, Martial Mermillod.   

Abstract

In the present experiments, participants had to verify properties of concepts but, depending on the trial condition, concept-property pairs were presented via headphones or on the screen. The results showed that participants took longer and were less accurate at verifying conceptual properties when the channel used to present the CONCEPT-property pair and the type of property matched in sensory modality (e.g., LEMON-yellow on screen; BLENDER-loud in headphones) compared to when properties and channel did not match (e.g., LEMON-yellow in headphones; BLENDER-loud on screen). Such interference is consistent with theories of embodied cognition holding that knowledge is grounded in modality-specific systems (Barsalou in Behav Brain Sci 22:577-660, 1999). When the resources of one modality are burdened during the task, processing costs are incurred in a conceptual task (Vermeulen et al. in Cognition 109:287-294, 2008).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23413000     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-012-0533-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  11 in total

Review 1.  Perceptual symbol systems.

Authors:  L W Barsalou
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Processing of irrelevant visual motion during performance of an auditory attention task.

Authors:  G Rees; C Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs.

Authors:  Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-03

4.  Unintended embodiment of concepts into percepts: sensory activation boosts attention for same-modality concepts in the attentional blink paradigm.

Authors:  Nicolas Vermeulen; Martial Mermillod; Jimmy Godefroid; Olivier Corneille
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-07-02

5.  Switching between sensory and affective systems incurs processing costs.

Authors:  Nicolas Vermeulen; Paula M Niedenthal; Olivier Luminet
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-02

6.  Perceptual processing affects conceptual processing.

Authors:  Saskia Van Dantzig; Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-05

7.  Visual memory and visual perception: when memory improves visual search.

Authors:  Benoit Riou; Mathieu Lesourd; Lionel Brunel; Rémy Versace
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-08

8.  Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities.

Authors:  J Duncan; S Martens; R Ward
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality.

Authors:  C Spence; M E Nicholls; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-02

10.  Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex.

Authors:  Olaf Hauk; Ingrid Johnsrude; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  1 in total

1.  Increased heart rate after exercise facilitates the processing of fearful but not disgusted faces.

Authors:  G Pezzulo; P Iodice; L Barca; P Chausse; S Monceau; M Mermillod
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.